On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 3:06 AM, Miklos Vajna <vmik...@collabora.co.uk> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 01:51:11PM +0100, Joren DC <jore...@libreoffice.org> > wrote: >> What about lbz, which is a combination of our 2 top-votes (lo and lobz)? >> lbz was also one of the choises, but it looks like a golden midway >> between the top votes :)? > > I don't really want to get involved in this bikesheding, but if there > was a vote at a QA meeting, it sounds unfair to me take the result of > that into this list and start arguing against its result.
Given that the top two choices (lo and lobz) were separated by only 1 vote and were both far ahead of the other options, suggesting a compromise seems like a reasonable action. > Why would > anyone cast his/her vote seriously next time, if the result of the vote > is not respected? I believe the vote is being respected, but I don't want to get into that here. As many have said, we're just bikeshedding here. I apologize for drawing out this discussion on the dev list for so long -- I'll take this discussion back to the QA list. Cheers, --R _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
