Petr Mladek wrote (30-06-11 14:03)
Rainer Bielefeld píše v St 29. 06. 2011 v 11:54 +0200:
Petr Mladek schrieb:
I suggest "LibO 3.4 Daily", LibO 3.5 Daily", ...
The daily builds from master should already use the 3.5 version
Sounds like a good solution, although I would prefer the variation
"
Petr Mladek wrote:
> Do testers and normal people know what master means? ;-)
>
I don't know - any other naming suggestion? ;)
Cheers,
-- Thorsten
pgpeYtnO1pt51.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop
Rainer Bielefeld píše v St 29. 06. 2011 v 11:54 +0200:
> Petr Mladek schrieb:
>
> > I suggest "LibO 3.4 Daily", LibO 3.5 Daily", ...
> > The daily builds from master should already use the 3.5 version
>
> Sounds like a good solution, although I would prefer the variation
> "LibO 3.4 Daily" for re
Rainer Bielefeld wrote:
> >I suggest "LibO 3.4 Daily", LibO 3.5 Daily", ...
> >The daily builds from master should already use the 3.5 version
>
> Sounds like a good solution, although I would prefer the variation
> "LibO 3.4 Daily" for release related builds
> "Libo Master" for Builds from Master
Caolán McNamara schrieb:
Hi
Michael Meeks - Thorsten Behrens
(You find the names on the incubator page)
CU
Rainer
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 11:45 +0200, Petr Mladek wrote:
> I would like to separate bugs against daily builds from master and from
> the stable branches. I suggest "LibO 3.4 Daily", LibO 3.5 Daily", ...
> The daily builds from master should already use the 3.5 version
> everywhere.
Whatever works, wh
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 3:42 AM, Petr Mladek wrote:
> Caolán McNamara píše v Út 28. 06. 2011 v 14:01 +0100:
>> On Tue, 2011-06-28 at 11:33 +0200, Alexander Thurgood wrote:
>> > Could we not have a "nightly" tag ? Or if we do that, are
>> > we going to have tag overkill like we did with OOo ?
>>
>>
Petr Mladek schrieb:
I suggest "LibO 3.4 Daily", LibO 3.5 Daily", ...
The daily builds from master should already use the 3.5 version
Sounds like a good solution, although I would prefer the variation
"LibO 3.4 Daily" for release related builds
"Libo Master" for Builds from Master
CU
Rainer
Rainer Bielefeld píše v St 29. 06. 2011 v 11:34 +0200:
> Caolán McNamara schrieb:
>
> > Unspecified is the best-fit for now, but it would be nice to separate
> > "dailies" from "unspecified". Is it possible to add another entry into
> > the bugzilla LibreOffice version list just for "dailies" (or
Caolán McNamara schrieb:
Unspecified is the best-fit for now, but it would be nice to separate
"dailies" from "unspecified". Is it possible to add another entry into
the bugzilla LibreOffice version list just for "dailies" (or nightlies)
Hi,
is "in discussion", although currently I only discu
On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 10:42 +0200, Petr Mladek wrote:
> Caolán McNamara píše v Út 28. 06. 2011 v 14:01 +0100:
> > On Tue, 2011-06-28 at 11:33 +0200, Alexander Thurgood wrote:
> > > Could we not have a "nightly" tag ? Or if we do that, are
> > > we going to have tag overkill like we did with OOo ?
>
Caolán McNamara píše v Út 28. 06. 2011 v 14:01 +0100:
> On Tue, 2011-06-28 at 11:33 +0200, Alexander Thurgood wrote:
> > Could we not have a "nightly" tag ? Or if we do that, are
> > we going to have tag overkill like we did with OOo ?
>
> Sounds like a good thing to have a different version than
On Tue, 2011-06-28 at 11:33 +0200, Alexander Thurgood wrote:
> Could we not have a "nightly" tag ? Or if we do that, are
> we going to have tag overkill like we did with OOo ?
Sounds like a good thing to have a different version than the catch-all
"unspecified", not sure who's got the power to add
13 matches
Mail list logo
