On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 3:42 AM, Petr Mladek <pmla...@suse.cz> wrote: > Caolán McNamara píše v Út 28. 06. 2011 v 14:01 +0100: >> On Tue, 2011-06-28 at 11:33 +0200, Alexander Thurgood wrote: >> > Could we not have a "nightly" tag ? Or if we do that, are >> > we going to have tag overkill like we did with OOo ? >> >> Sounds like a good thing to have a different version than the catch-all >> "unspecified", not sure who's got the power to add versions into the >> list ? Petr ? >> >> As per the other thread, new dailies should have build-ids in their >> about dialog which are useful from a dev perspective to identify what >> happens between a good daily and a bad daily, but those change >> per-commit of course so best pasted into the body of a daily bug report >> as free-form text. > > One solutions would be to add something like this to the tinderbox > scripts: > > pull_date=`date` > > ./ pull -r > > ./autogen > [...] > --with-build-version="Daily built at $pull_date" > > Another solution would be to define a default value in the configure.in,
I like that better... the tinderbox rely heavily on autogen.lastrun right now. tweaking that file on the fly to substitute/add a date-of-the-day is certainly doable but much more fragile an error prone than a config-level generated value. and the later would also be easy to use for the occasional one-shot manual build. Norbert _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
