Caolán McNamara píše v Út 28. 06. 2011 v 14:01 +0100:
> On Tue, 2011-06-28 at 11:33 +0200, Alexander Thurgood wrote:
> > Could we not have a "nightly" tag ? Or if we do that, are
> > we going to have tag overkill like we did with OOo ?
>
> Sounds like a good thing to have a different version than the catch-all
> "unspecified", not sure who's got the power to add versions into the
> list ? Petr ?
>
> As per the other thread, new dailies should have build-ids in their
> about dialog which are useful from a dev perspective to identify what
> happens between a good daily and a bad daily, but those change
> per-commit of course so best pasted into the body of a daily bug report
> as free-form text.
One solutions would be to add something like this to the tinderbox
scripts:
pull_date=`date`
./ pull -r
./autogen
[...]
--with-build-version="Daily built at $pull_date"
Another solution would be to define a default value in the configure.in,
e.g.
now=`date`
BUILD_VER_STRING="Built at $now"
Someone mentioned that it would be better to mention the last commit id.
It is not easy with the many repositories. I would wait with this
approach for the single repo.
What do you think?
Best Regards,
Petr
_______________________________________________
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
