[Libreoffice] [MacOS] Horizontal cursor positioning in justified text

2011-12-21 Thread James C
Hello All, Justified text changes the kerning (space between letters) of words on a line. The cursor positioning in writer seems to assume, falsely, that all of the adjustment happens in the spaces between words. So the cursor ends up in the middle of, or on the wrong side of, letters. This mat

[Libreoffice] [MacOS] Starting dev-install is hairy

2011-12-21 Thread James C
Hello All, Thank you for your help to get me started. I have a build of libreoffice which is good enough to exercise at least one of my itches. I submitted a patch with git send-email. I presume that it is awaiting moderation. On the way to confirming that, I had various behaviour from trying

[Libreoffice] [Bug 35673] LibreOffice 3.4 most annoying bugs

2011-12-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673 --- Comment #240 from Rainer Bielefeld 2011-12-21 23:22:03 PST --- Nominate "Bug 41089 - FILESAVE: Impossible with password protection" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this m

[Libreoffice] Index table: character style 'Index link' instead of 'Internet link'

2011-12-21 Thread Alexander O. Anisimov
Hi all, I have downloaded LO3.5beta1 and started play with it. Now Writer automatically creates links to chapters in index table. But why the link character style is 'Internet Link', instead of 'Index Link'? When character style is 'Internet Link', all items are underline. In my humble opinion,

Re: [Libreoffice] Build problems (and some solutions) in Mac OSX

2011-12-21 Thread James C
Hello Norbert, I license my past and future contributions to LibreOffice under LGPLv3+ and MPL. I have created an entry for myself on the wiki, and will link the archive of this email into it in due course. Regards, James. On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 6:01 AM, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: > BTW can you

Re: [Libreoffice] binfilter dependencies

2011-12-21 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 6:29 PM, Peter Foley wrote: > On Wed, 21 Dec 2011, Mat?? Kukan wrote: > >> On 21 December 2011 01:25, Peter Foley wrote: >> > >> > Matus, >> > >> > I noticed that you added basic to tail_build in feature/gbuild_extensions. >> > Be warned that when feature/gbuild_extensions

Re: [Libreoffice] .: 2 commits - vcl/inc vcl/source writerfilter/inc writerfilter/source

2011-12-21 Thread Miklos Vajna
Hi August, On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 08:11:42PM -0800, August Sodora wrote: > vcl/inc/vcl/field.hxx |9 -- > vcl/source/control/field2.cxx | 92 > > writerfilter/inc/resourcemodel/TagLogger.hxx|5 - > writerfilt

Re: [Libreoffice] binfilter dependencies

2011-12-21 Thread Peter Foley
On Wed, 21 Dec 2011, Mat?? Kukan wrote: > On 21 December 2011 01:25, Peter Foley wrote: > > > > Matus, > > > > I noticed that you added basic to tail_build in feature/gbuild_extensions. > > Be warned that when feature/gbuild_extensions gets merged to master > > binfilter/prj/build.lst will have t

Re: [Libreoffice] Build problems (and some solutions) in Mac OSX

2011-12-21 Thread James C
I release the change originally attached below under LGPLv3+ and MPL. On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 7:04 PM, James C wrote: > Hello All, > > I have burned about 1.5 GB of metered network bandwidth, so far, > following these instructions: > > http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/How_to_build#G

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] fdo#38832 Replace ScChangeActionTable with std::map.

2011-12-21 Thread Eike Rathke
Hi Marcel, On Wednesday, 2011-12-21 21:25:19 +0100, Marcel Metz wrote: > > Btw, did you check if Calc changetracking and accepting/rejecting > > actions still works? > > Well, I assumed that this was cached by the `make check` tests but If > you're asking like that I think this isn't sufficient,

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] Fix for fdo43460 Part XV getLength() to isEmpty()

2011-12-21 Thread Olivier Hallot
Please find attached a partial fix for Easy Hack FDO43460 Part XV Module embeddobj -- Olivier Hallot Founder and Steering Commitee Member The Document Foundation From 7bb470ffd660f3d888a5770296d165e546b5865f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Olivier Hallot Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 19:54:11 -0200 Sub

Re: [Libreoffice] [ANNOUNCE] libreoffice-3.4.99.1 tag created (3.5.0-beta1)

2011-12-21 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 06:34:26PM +0100, Petr Mladek wrote: > Note that I used the correct version 3.4.99.1 for this beta. We use > (3.3.99.X also for 3.4 betas). I am sorry that I used 3.5.0.0 for > beta0. The 3.5.0.x version are reserved for release candidates. Can we tag the beta0 as 3.4.99.0

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] fdo#38832 Replace ScChangeActionTable with std::map.

2011-12-21 Thread Marcel Metz
On 21.12.2011 21:00, Eike Rathke wrote: > > The assertion tells if there was a dup, in that case something was going > wrong and memory leaks. > > Anyway, aparently you were confused by the two different tables/maps and > mixing iterator from different map, see > http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libre

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Re: [PATCH] fdo#38832 Replace ScChangeActionTable with std::map.

2011-12-21 Thread Marcel Metz
On 21.12.2011 20:27, Michael Stahl wrote: > > pushed to master, with 2 small corrections: > > this here inverted the logic, Get == 0 means not found: > - if ( p != pAct && !rTable.Get( p->GetActionNumber() ) ) > + if ( p != pAct && rMap.find( p->GetActionNumber() ) != rMap.end() ) > > and in Sc

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Re: [PATCH] fdo#38832 Replace ScChangeActionTable with std::map.

2011-12-21 Thread Eike Rathke
Hi Michael, On Wednesday, 2011-12-21 20:27:21 +0100, Michael Stahl wrote: > and in ScChangeTrack::Reject, the old code iterated from end to start > (dunno if that is important there, but why not use a reverse_iterator) Yes, rejections must happen in reverse order there, thanks for catching. E

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] fdo#38832 Replace ScChangeActionTable with std::map.

2011-12-21 Thread Eike Rathke
Hi Marcel, On Wednesday, 2011-12-21 16:18:46 +0100, Marcel Metz wrote: > I've tested the patch with 'make check', but would like to point out > that the reviewer should take special care of the change in > 'sc/source/core/tool/chgtrack.cxx:3140-3160'. From my understanding > of the code the tools

[Libreoffice] feature/gbuild_cppuhelper

2011-12-21 Thread Stephan Bergmann
Matúš, I had intended to come back much earlier with feedback on your feature/gbuild_cppuhelper branch, but the situation turns out to be somewhat problematic: I set out with a recent master (including Michael Stahl's fix for adding the ".3" at the end of libuno_*.dylib install names) on Mac

[Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Re: [PATCH] Replace SwTxtPortionTable with std::map.

2011-12-21 Thread Michael Stahl
On 21/12/11 18:50, Marcel Metz wrote: > Hello lo-devs, > > this patch replaces yet another Table class use. > > regards Marcel Metz thanks for the patch, pushed to master regards, michael ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.or

[Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Re: [PATCH] fdo#38832 Replace ScChangeActionTable with std::map.

2011-12-21 Thread Michael Stahl
On 21/12/11 16:18, Marcel Metz wrote: > Hello lo-devs, > > I've tested the patch with 'make check', but would like to point out > that the reviewer should take special care of the change in > 'sc/source/core/tool/chgtrack.cxx:3140-3160'. From my understanding > of the code the tools Table does not

Re: [Libreoffice] make dev-install hangs

2011-12-21 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 07:29:06PM +0100, Jan Holesovsky wrote: > I see the same hang as Miklos; huge ram here too. I'm using stock make > 3.82 - can we disable this additional toplevel gbuild, as you say that > it ends up doing nothing anyway? Well, it _should_ do nothing. But for example on Ubu

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] [PUSHED] Automatically select an option page if a user clicks on a category

2011-12-21 Thread Jan Holesovsky
Hi August, Astron, On 2011-12-21 at 11:10 +0100, Stefan Knorr (Astron) wrote: > > All three of your patches have been pushed on master. > > Hehe, yeah, I think he pushed them himself, right? > > In any case, many thanks for the pony, just did a first build, works > beautifully and you also got

Re: [Libreoffice] make dev-install hangs

2011-12-21 Thread Jan Holesovsky
Hi Bjoern, On 2011-12-21 at 13:35 +0100, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote: > > The problem seems to be specific to dev-install, e.g. 'make tags' does > > not have this delay. > That is because dev-install now runs a toplevel one process gbuild run after > the buildpl run. It should never find anything to

[Libreoffice] Old Oracle Mysql Connector no longer works with 3.5 on Windows - looking for a regular build solution ?

2011-12-21 Thread Alexander Thurgood
Hi all, I've been informed by Fernand Vanrie (who has been involved in getting Base to do a whole lot of stuff that I never thought possible for a long time) that the old mysql connector extension supplied by Oracle no longer functions with 3.5 on Windows, whereas it did still continue to work on

[Libreoffice] [Bug 37361] LibreOffice 3.5 most annoying bugs

2011-12-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37361 Thomas Thym changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||40482, 40489, 43765, 34436 -- Configure b

[Libreoffice] [Bug 37361] LibreOffice 3.5 most annoying bugs

2011-12-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37361 Thomas Thym changed: What|Removed |Added CC||unget...@mevin.net --- Comment #60 from Th

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] Replace SwTxtPortionTable with std::map.

2011-12-21 Thread Marcel Metz
Hello lo-devs, this patch replaces yet another Table class use. regards Marcel Metz --- sw/source/core/text/inftxt.hxx | 19 --- 1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/sw/source/core/text/inftxt.hxx b/sw/source/core/text/inftxt.hxx index 34845ec..0dc05

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED][PATCH] Remove SC_DLLPUBLIC to fix build on msvc 2008

2011-12-21 Thread Matúš Kukan
On 21 December 2011 18:00, Matúš Kukan wrote: >> [1] >> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=f958657cc5a179a2bccff06f88cd36f80b779184 > > Oh, this should not be pushed, I'm sorry. Please revert that part. > hmm, I'm not sure if you have commit access, anyway pushed as http://c

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Remove SC_DLLPUBLIC to fix build on msvc 2008

2011-12-21 Thread Matúš Kukan
Hi Korrawit On 21 December 2011 17:52, Korrawit Pruegsanusak wrote: > Anyway, I don't have enough knowledge for why this works, but after > reverting, it passed through this point. (but still failed somewhere > else) Where ? Is it related to this problem ? > So, reviews or comments are very app

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] Remove SC_DLLPUBLIC to fix build on msvc 2008

2011-12-21 Thread Korrawit Pruegsanusak
Hello Matúš, all, I've trying to build on windows / cygwin, but I found that in one of your commit [1], part of it [2] breaks the linker. So, I attach a patch reverting this. Anyway, I don't have enough knowledge for why this works, but after reverting, it passed through this point. (but still

Re: [Libreoffice] LoadComponentFromUrl misuse lead to crash

2011-12-21 Thread Laurent Godard
Hi Caolan > Checked this locally (finally), and I get no crash. I get a "unsupported > url" dialog from starbasic. > i checked under windows, ok "unsupported url" seems that the only persons that reproduces the crash are under ubuntu (10.00 for me, 11.10 for jbfaure) you and cedric (i assume yo

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Fix fdo#42783 get rid of CPU define/build system variable

2011-12-21 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 9:58 AM, Eike Rathke wrote: > Hi, > > On Tuesday, 2011-12-20 17:46:22 -0600, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: > >> > IMHO (other might disagree), we should get rid of these opaque names in the >> > long run anyway. INPATH and OUTPATH should only be "build" or "host". >> > >> >> Sure

[Libreoffice] [REVIEW] fdo#40482 sw: view options changed by printing

2011-12-21 Thread Michael Stahl
i'd like to have the fix for $SUBJECT in 3.4.5, it is a regression introduced in 3.4.2 or 3.4.3, am too lazy to check which. http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=89d2733e16ae6233deea6bef3193bd45c89b854c ___ LibreOffice mailing list L

[Libreoffice] [Bug 35673] LibreOffice 3.4 most annoying bugs

2011-12-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673 Bug 35673 depends on bug 40482, which changed state. Bug 40482 Summary: CONFIGURATION: Formatting aids - displayed nonprinting characters become unchecked during printing and PDF export https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40482

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Fix fdo#42783 get rid of CPU define/build system variable

2011-12-21 Thread Eike Rathke
Hi, On Tuesday, 2011-12-20 17:46:22 -0600, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: > > IMHO (other might disagree), we should get rid of these opaque names in the > > long run anyway. INPATH and OUTPATH should only be "build" or "host". > > > > Sure, but then stuff like rm -fr */$INPATH may end-up having > unex

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] fdo#38832 Replace ScChangeActionTable with std::map.

2011-12-21 Thread Marcel Metz
Hello lo-devs, I've tested the patch with 'make check', but would like to point out that the reviewer should take special care of the change in 'sc/source/core/tool/chgtrack.cxx:3140-3160'. From my understanding of the code the tools Table does not allow multiple entires with the same key so that

Re: [Libreoffice] [REVIEW-3-4-5]Re: gcc 4.6.2 + boost 1.48.0 and unordered_map assignment operator const issues [was gcc 4.6.2]

2011-12-21 Thread Michael Meeks
On Wed, 2011-12-21 at 13:15 +0100, Petr Mladek wrote: > So, I have pushed it to the libreoffice-3-4 branch, see > http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/bootstrap/commit/?h=libreoffice-3-4&id=9c2ab9f4febec2b2c5fac25469f1d0cfedc6af5e > > We need two more approvals for 3-4-5 branch. You h

Re: [Libreoffice] [REVIEW-3-4-5]Re: gcc 4.6.2 + boost 1.48.0 and unordered_map assignment operator const issues [was gcc 4.6.2]

2011-12-21 Thread Rafael Cabral
Great! My initial proposed fix is partially right when it to comes to "reimplement the operador=" (not sure about the casts) whenever the compiler is in the C++03 or bellow mode or if C++0x is not supported as well according : http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_48_0/doc/html/move/emulation_lim

Re: [Libreoffice] gbuild'ified salhelper

2011-12-21 Thread Jan Holesovsky
Mi Matus, On 2011-12-21 at 13:59 +0100, Matúš Kukan wrote: > nah, it was wrong but hopefully > http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?h=feature/gbuild_extensions&id=6c6055750dd4c0ddcff06fcf5b6d93d576245633 > is ok. > It at least builds for me with MinGW. Looks great to me too, plea

Re: [Libreoffice] gbuild'ified salhelper

2011-12-21 Thread Matúš Kukan
On 19 December 2011 16:42, Matúš Kukan wrote: > On 19 December 2011 14:59, Jan Holesovsky wrote: >> Yes, calling directly indeed looks right.  I suppose the original intent >> was not to link against Windows code for the >> InternetGetConnectedStateEx() function in extensions/ ; but I think it >>

Re: [Libreoffice] make dev-install hangs

2011-12-21 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 12:51:11PM +0100, Miklos Vajna wrote: > Between the WARN and the Developer lines it waits around 6 minutes Also: Why make version are you using? I am using 3.81 with a bugfix for bug 20033. Do you maybe use 3.82 unpatched? It introduced the performance regression that Michae

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH][PUSHED] Remove obsolete IsWin95A function

2011-12-21 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Mon, 2011-11-07 at 17:27 +0100, Jesús Corrius wrote: > > What does actually IsWin95A() return on today's systems? If it's true, then > > the whole if() is true. But I don't have any Windows system to test this on, > > and I don't really dare to just guess, as the 'return TRUE' part is a clear >

Re: [Libreoffice] make dev-install hangs

2011-12-21 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 12:51:11PM +0100, Miklos Vajna wrote: > The problem seems to be specific to dev-install, e.g. 'make tags' does > not have this delay. That is because dev-install now runs a toplevel one process gbuild run after the buildpl run. It should never find anything to build. On my m

[Libreoffice] License statement

2011-12-21 Thread Carl Taylor
I confirm that I contribute to LibreOffice under the conditions of the LGPLv3+ and MPL licences. Carl Taylor ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: [Libreoffice] gcc 4.6.2 + boost 1.48.0 and unordered_map assignment operator const issues [was gcc 4.6.2]

2011-12-21 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Tue, 2011-12-20 at 09:30 +, Caolán McNamara wrote: > On Tue, 2011-12-20 at 10:13 +0100, Petr Mladek wrote: > > Hi Rafael, > > > > fixes for 3.4.5-rc2 need triple review, so I forward this mail to the > > mailing list. > > We've seen this problem recently with our rawhide gcc as well and 3.

Re: [Libreoffice] Build problems (and some solutions) in Mac OSX

2011-12-21 Thread Christian Lohmaier
Hi James, *, On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 11:20 AM, James C wrote: > [...] > Christian, if I resort to removing macports, is there a standard set > of instructions for cleaning up after it? When I talk about removing macports, I mean removing traces of it from your environment. I don't know macports,

[Libreoffice] [REVIEW-3-4-5]Re: gcc 4.6.2 + boost 1.48.0 and unordered_map assignment operator const issues [was gcc 4.6.2]

2011-12-21 Thread Petr Mladek
Caolán McNamara píše v St 21. 12. 2011 v 11:38 +: > after some digging the difference between 3.4 and 3.5 that makes 3.5 > build is that the gbuild modules are additionally built with -std=c++0x > on 3.5 (only the dmake ones are built with that on 3.4). > > Seems that a recent boost + recent

Re: [Libreoffice] Build problems (and some solutions) in Mac OSX

2011-12-21 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi James, On Wed, 2011-12-21 at 23:20 +1300, James C wrote: > I am currently building libreoffice-3-5, and will have some > investigation to do, after it stops. Great :-) > Michael, yes, changing branches required much less bandwidth than > initially downloading. Good. > In o

Re: [Libreoffice] make dev-install hangs

2011-12-21 Thread Miklos Vajna
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 09:57:34AM -0500, Kohei Yoshida wrote: > Indeed. It took 6 minutes on my machine for make dev-install to finish, > but it did finish eventually. This still happens here on today's master (5e30598): [ WARN ] !!! [ WARN ] !!! vcl/source/salmain/salmain is linked

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] [PUSHED] Automatically select an option page if a user clicks on a category

2011-12-21 Thread August Sodora
Great, I'd love to implement more of the things on that page too. August Sodora aug...@gmail.com (201) 280-8138 On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 5:10 AM, Stefan Knorr (Astron) wrote: > Hi August, > > On 21 December 2011 10:12, Cedric Bosdonnat wrote: >> All three of your patches have been pushed on ma

Re: [Libreoffice] SDK installation problem was: libreoffice-3.4.99.1 tag created (3.5.0-beta1)

2011-12-21 Thread Petr Mladek
Bjoern Michaelsen píše v St 21. 12. 2011 v 11:19 +0100: > On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 08:11:36PM +0100, Petr Mladek wrote: > > I am not able to find why the installation is called twice. The gbuild > > stuff is still a bit cryptic to me :-) > > This is fixed on master, the relevant fixes are > > a29

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] [PUSHED] Update French dictionaries

2011-12-21 Thread Cedric Bosdonnat
Hello Olivier, On Tue, 2011-12-20 at 09:26 -0800, Olivier R. wrote: > Sorry. > Here is the patch: > http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/file/n3601795/0001-Update-French-dictionaries.patch > 0001-Update-French-dictionaries.patch Many thanks for your patch. It has been pushed to master and cherry

Re: [Libreoffice] Build problems (and some solutions) in Mac OSX

2011-12-21 Thread James C
Hello Tor, Norbert, Michael and Christian, Thank you for your welcome and help in narrowing the problem. I am not yet a Mac graphics expert. Depending on which itches I develop, I may well end up learning on this project. I am currently building libreoffice-3-5, and will have some investigation

Re: [Libreoffice] SDK installation problem was: libreoffice-3.4.99.1 tag created (3.5.0-beta1)

2011-12-21 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 08:11:36PM +0100, Petr Mladek wrote: > I am not able to find why the installation is called twice. The gbuild > stuff is still a bit cryptic to me :-) This is fixed on master, the relevant fixes are a298986d627b944eb94fdd8b0c30a9298f14ab65 9c197011a564c185db425d38425f3a8

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] [PUSHED] Automatically select an option page if a user clicks on a category

2011-12-21 Thread Stefan Knorr (Astron)
Hi August, On 21 December 2011 10:12, Cedric Bosdonnat wrote: > All three of your patches have been pushed on master. Hehe, yeah, I think he pushed them himself, right? In any case, many thanks for the pony, just did a first build, works beautifully and you also got a mention here now: http://w

Re: [Libreoffice] binfilter dependencies

2011-12-21 Thread Matúš Kukan
On 21 December 2011 01:25, Peter Foley wrote: > > Matus, > > I noticed that you added basic to tail_build in feature/gbuild_extensions. > Be warned that when feature/gbuild_extensions gets merged to master > binfilter/prj/build.lst will have to get changed from depending on basic > to depending on

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] [PUSHED] Automatically select an option page if a user clicks on a category

2011-12-21 Thread Cedric Bosdonnat
Hi August, All three of your patches have been pushed on master. Many thanks for these: don't hesitate to provide other nice patches ;) -- Cedric On Sun, 2011-12-18 at 14:39 -0500, August Sodora wrote: > I split the work into three patches in case part of this needed to be > rejected. The first

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH][PUSHED] Fix for fdo43460 Part XII getLength() to isEmpty(

2011-12-21 Thread Cedric Bosdonnat
Hello Olivier, On Mon, 2011-12-19 at 18:13 -0200, Olivier Hallot wrote: > Please find attached a partial fix for Easy Hack FDO43460 > > Part XII Many thanks for your patch! I fixed a typo in it, but pushed it. -- Cedric ___ LibreOffice mailing list L

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH][PUSHED] Fix for fdo43460 Part XIII getLength() to isEmpty()

2011-12-21 Thread Cedric Bosdonnat
Hi Olivier, On Tue, 2011-12-20 at 20:52 -0200, Olivier Hallot wrote: > Please find attached a partial fix for Easy Hack FDO43460 > > Part XIII Many thanks for the patch. I just pushed it to master. -- Cedric ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@l

Re: [Libreoffice] SDK installation problem was: libreoffice-3.4.99.1 tag created (3.5.0-beta1)

2011-12-21 Thread Andreas Radke
Thank you. The installation now finished well. -Andy ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice