On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 9:58 AM, Eike Rathke <er...@redhat.com> wrote: > Hi, > > On Tuesday, 2011-12-20 17:46:22 -0600, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: > >> > IMHO (other might disagree), we should get rid of these opaque names in the >> > long run anyway. INPATH and OUTPATH should only be "build" or "host". >> > >> >> Sure, but then stuff like rm -fr */$INPATH may end-up having >> unexpected consequences... >> >> once everything is on workdir (and even in solver) then sure no >> problem to use build/host... but as long as INPATH is in individual >> module that maybe a bit dangerous to change with such common terms. > > INPATH is also used by several scripts in solenv/bin/ and others. > > Still, there should be a way to have non-dbgutil and dbgutil builds (or > builds with different switches, whatever) in parallel. So we'd need > _some_ mechanism to differentiate between output directories.
imo: that should eventually be separate workdir... but as long as we still have dmake modules around, I would not mess with IN/OUTPATH... (work*risk)/reward ratio is really not appealing. Norbert _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
