Re: [Libreoffice] segfault in sc

On Sun, Oct 09, 2011 at 02:19:02PM -0700, julien2412 wrote: > Hello, > > In sc, if i run make -sr, I've got this : > Error: UcbContentProviderProxy::getContentProvider - No provider for > 'com.sun.star.help.XMLHelp. From File > /home/maryline/compile-libreoffice/libo/ucb/source/core/provprox.cxx a

Re: [Libreoffice] QA session at LibreOffice conference

Hi, I will no be there and am not involved into any preparations, so I do not know what we are talking about. Unfortunately this and next week my job only will leave few time for LibO activity. [...] And usually it also are ad hoc contributions that I make. As we all - more or less, and I

Re: [Libreoffice] segfault in sc

Hello Julien, 2011/10/10 Julien Nabet : > Le 10/10/2011 21:56, Michael Meeks a écrit : >> >> Hi Julien, >> >> On Mon, 2011-10-10 at 20:01 +0200, Julien Nabet wrote: >>> >>> In fact, I used make debug=true for the test but it was useless since I >>> compile the whole repo in debug (my autogen.lastr

Re: [Libreoffice] Declarations after statements

It would seem that, unless C-unique incompatibilities with C++ are involved, compiling as C++, even though only C constructs are used, does the job in VC++. One can still force C calling conventions but that might take more work if C Language header files have not been adjusted to work properl

Re: [Libreoffice] segfault in sc

Le 10/10/2011 21:56, Michael Meeks a écrit : Hi Julien, On Mon, 2011-10-10 at 20:01 +0200, Julien Nabet wrote: In fact, I used make debug=true for the test but it was useless since I compile the whole repo in debug (my autogen.lastrun includes these lines : Nice :-) well that means we

Re: [Libreoffice] QA session at LibreOffice conference

Hi Michael, Michael Meeks wrote (10-10-11 22:15) Looks like you're in charge :-) and/or you had a great list of questions. :-) This is your chance to discuss this, you've been concerned about it for a while, and we havn't managed to get to it. I'd really like to understand y

Re: [Libreoffice] troubles with merging libraries

Hi Matus, On Mon, 2011-10-10 at 20:22 +0200, Matúš Kukan wrote: > I just realized (although it's quite basic thing... I was never > thinking more about details of this merging thing) > that we can't merge anything what we would want. Sure - we have to merge sets of inter-dependent librari

Re: [Libreoffice] QA session at LibreOffice conference

Hi Cor, On Mon, 2011-10-10 at 17:44 +0200, Cor Nouws wrote: > Doing some preparations for Paris, I see there is a discrepancy between > the program on the website and the one in the spreadsheet, that can be > downloaded. Yes - the spreadsheet is more authoritative, Charles has a yet mor

Re: [Libreoffice] segfault in sc

Hi Julien, On Mon, 2011-10-10 at 20:01 +0200, Julien Nabet wrote: > In fact, I used make debug=true for the test but it was useless since I > compile the whole repo in debug (my autogen.lastrun includes these lines : Nice :-) well that means we get wonderful debugging symbols with string

Re: [Libreoffice] Declarations after statements

Hello, Declarations after statements are possible only in C99. And MSVC does not support C99 (refrain from bitching here, please). sorry Tor, I was not enthusiasm, just systematic and from *xes world. ... and I am - almost - too young to know there was a C89 before... If time allows, I will t

[Libreoffice] Use system python 2.6 on MacOS

Dear list! I'm using libreoffice 3.4.3, which comes with python 2.3 on MacOS. But I need my 'normal' python 2.6 of the system because I have to import some new or other modules (subprocess, PySide, etc.) in my macros which are not supported with python 2.3! Does anybody have any idea how to

[Libreoffice] troubles with merging libraries

Hi there, I just realized (although it's quite basic thing... I was never thinking more about details of this merging thing) that we can't merge anything what we would want. For example we have libraries linking chain: svx -> drawninglayer -> cppcanvas -> canvastools In list of always used libs (

[Libreoffice] build error

Hi did pull -r and make clean around 14:00 this afternoon. command line output and build-error log here: http://pastebin.com/2THrJukY rerunning build in xpdf: log for /home/cono/src/git/libo_core/xpdf dmake: makefile.mk: line 39: Error: -- Include file settings.mk, not found after rerunning

Re: [Libreoffice] segfault in sc

Le 10/10/2011 13:27, Michael Meeks a écrit : On Sun, 2011-10-09 at 22:46 -0700, julien2412 wrote: ... Secondly Julien - your build is with debug=true - that can change behaviour, but of course we should chase down those changed behaviours and try to work out which is causing the grief [ a

Re: [Libreoffice] RFC: Idea for fuzz-testing filters

Hi Marc, On 05.10.2011 14:55, Marc-André Laverdière wrote: Why bother about this? Why not use what's available out there? Well... - Fuzzgrind isn't well documented and won't work out of the box, - zzuf has too many bells and whistles, and won't guarantee that every byte has been messed up wi

[Libreoffice] [RFC] make binfilter depend on tail_build

Hi, I'd like to propose making binfilter depend on tail_build. Because binfilter is legacy code and it's 11316 lines worth of dmake makefiles are highly unlikly to be converted to gbuild, the only way that binfilters's dependencies ( basic vcl xmlscript connectivity framework svtools offapi li

[Libreoffice] QA session at LibreOffice conference

Hi Michael, Rainer, Doing some preparations for Paris, I see there is a discrepancy between the program on the website and the one in the spreadsheet, that can be downloaded. The website mentions Michael to do the QA session on Friday morning. The spreadsheet mentions me. I did not apply - I

Re: [Libreoffice] ODBC handles, a quibble

On Sun, 2011-10-09 at 15:27 +0200, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote: > > I did not read *all* of it, but it seems the ODBC documentation > contains no such madness. So my guess is that the Microsoft > "implementation" of SQL-CLI that is ODBC defines that handles cross > compilation units. IMHO the other im

Re: [Libreoffice] ODBC handles, a quibble

On Sun, 2011-10-09 at 15:09 +0200, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote: > > Just ignore the function that diff reports :) (Or send a patch to GNU > diffutils so that it recognises C++ syntax ;-) ) Thank you for your reassurance that I am not hallucinating. All-in-all, I guess my attention is better applied

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] hyphenation fixes

Hi, I have attached new patches for the Hyphen library and Hungarian hyphenation patterns, and the old one for English dictionaries and the test file from my previous letter. I have found and fixed a new hyphenation problem at the hyphen character. OpenOffice.org/LibreOffice can hyphenate the wor

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] [PUSHED] .: stoc/source

At 3:11am -0400 Wed, 05 Oct 2011, Kevin Hunter wrote: At 2:58am -0400 Wed, 05 Oct 2011, Stephan Bergmann wrote: (I assume you already stated somewhere what license your contributions are under, even though that's not explicitly listed at

Re: [Libreoffice] libreoffice sdk 3.4 and SWT Linux issue

Hi Othman, On Sun, 2011-10-09 at 06:34 -0700, othman wrote: > I wrote a Java libreoffice addon using netbeans openoffice plugin and > libreoffice 3.4.this addon launches a SWT window when i click a libreoffice > toolbar button. this works fine in windows 7 with libreoffice sdk 3.4 Great :

[Libreoffice] [Bug 37361] LibreOffice 3.5 most annoying bugs

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37361 Rainer Bielefeld changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||38908 -- Configure bugmail: https://

Re: [Libreoffice] segfault in sc

On Sun, 2011-10-09 at 22:46 -0700, julien2412 wrote: > Thank you Markus for having put the bt that I gave you in pastebin. :-) > Marc-Andre, when I read the Markus message this morning, I thought exactly > the same thing, so here it is : > http://pastebin.com/gTHqax6r Interestin

Re: [Libreoffice] RFC: Idea for fuzz-testing filters

Hi Marc, On Mon, 2011-10-10 at 15:08 +0530, Marc-André Laverdière wrote: > I have been struggling along the way and eventually put together this > small starting point... What do you think about it? Looks fun :-) I guess it is necessary to have a separate remote-control process if we want

Re: [Libreoffice] RFC: Idea for fuzz-testing filters

Hello everyone, I have been struggling along the way and eventually put together this small starting point... What do you think about it? Marc-André Laverdière Software Security Scientist Innovation Labs, Tata Consultancy Services Hyderabad, India On 10/07/2011 01:38 PM, Michael Meeks wrote: >

Re: [Libreoffice] Declarations after statements

On Sat, 2011-10-08 at 16:05 +0200, Fridrich Strba wrote: > I cannot ask people to build on Windows, but could we add for those gcc > cases simply -Wdeclaration-after-statement warning, so people at least > see what is happening and so that tinderboxes whose turnaround is faster > then those of