Hi Michael, Rainer,
Doing some preparations for Paris, I see there is a discrepancy between
the program on the website and the one in the spreadsheet, that can be
downloaded.
The website mentions Michael to do the QA session on Friday morning.
The spreadsheet mentions me.
I did not apply - I remember that Michael suggested the possibility.
It's not that I feel not capable to hold a talk/session. However, I have
not prepared anything and have hardly been able to do any QA work for
the past 5+ weeks. And usually it also are ad hoc contributions that I make.
So talking about "Improving the Development / QA cycle" ... I feel I do
not have enough real knowledge.
I can ask the same questions of course, as done on the list: present the
same view, insight in factors that play a role in the process.
However for many of those factors/areas I lack enough detailed knowledge
to give some solid ground to a discussion, IMO, other then if then else
then.
If people are glad with some general overview and points at the QA and
the dev side that need consideration and at best some harmonisation
(apart from the extra hands that are welcome of course) ... well, OK.
But then Rainer would be at least as good as me for that?
So what do you think?
Cheers,
--
- Cor
- http://nl.libreoffice.org
_______________________________________________
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
