That is correct.
But that helps only when we install using 'make install'
In the deb package, it still installs in /opt
/solenv/bin/modules/installer/setupscript.pm
This script generates the setup script and uses all default variables.
How can i generate a customized deb package?
I wish to change
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 11:26:31AM +0700, Tantai Tanakanok wrote:
> I change font name from "TH SarabunNew" to "TH Sarabun New" because this new
> font was renamed by the owner (SIPA) when it is actually released.
>
Thanks, pushed!
Can you confirm that this and all your future patches are licens
I change font name from "TH SarabunNew" to "TH Sarabun New" because this new
font was renamed by the owner (SIPA) when it is actually released.
Thanks,
Tantai Thanakanok
--
_/|\_ Tantai Thanakanok. Open Source Development Co., Ltd.
Tel: +66 38 311816, Fax: +66 38 773128, http://www.osdev.co.th/
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 8:51 PM, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
>> I haven't
>> checked for other modules, and I certainly agree that for
>> java-extensions and external java module like tomcat we probably don't
>> want to go that route...
>
> Yup. But wow, isn't tomcat a http server? What do we even use
2011/9/21 Kohei Yoshida :
> Yup. But wow, isn't tomcat a http server? What do we even use tomcat
> for? ;-)
>
Wiki extension ;)
Tom
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreof
On Tue, 2011-09-20 at 20:06 -0500, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 7:42 PM, Kohei Yoshida
> wrote:
> >
> > What I like about ant is that you don't need to list every single java
> > source file you need to compile, whereas in make you do (unless I'm
> > missing something). That
On 09/20/11 14:23, julien2412 wrote:
> Hello Jesse,
>
> I tested on a small piece of code, "unused function" check works.
> About "unused function", there is the file unusedcode.easy regularly
> regenerated by Caolán. So I don't know.
>
> I wonder too if "git updating" cppcheck would remove the f
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 7:42 PM, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
>
> What I like about ant is that you don't need to list every single java
> source file you need to compile, whereas in make you do (unless I'm
> missing something). That makes a huge difference and makes the ant
> build script very small reg
On Tue, 2011-09-20 at 19:29 -0500, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 6:02 PM, Kohei Yoshida
> wrote:
> >
> > Well, if ant is used to build Java jar packages, then, I would prefer
> > ant be used because ant's build script is much simpler than make's for
> > Java packages. For Jav
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 6:02 PM, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
>
> Well, if ant is used to build Java jar packages, then, I would prefer
> ant be used because ant's build script is much simpler than make's for
> Java packages. For Java, ant is pretty much the standard build
> system.
The problem is 'ant'
Hi guys,
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 6:15 PM, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 4:18 PM, Peter Foley wrote:
>> Use of apache ant in libreoffice seemes to be restricted to these 5
>> modules.
>>
>> beanshell qadevOOo scripting swext xmerge
>>
>> I was wondering if there is any particu
On Tue, 20 Sep 2011, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 4:18 PM, Peter Foley wrote:
> > Use of apache ant in libreoffice seemes to be restricted to these 5
> > modules.
> >
> > beanshell qadevOOo scripting swext xmerge
> >
> > I was wondering if there is any particular reason for u
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 4:18 PM, Peter Foley wrote:
> Use of apache ant in libreoffice seemes to be restricted to these 5
> modules.
>
> beanshell qadevOOo scripting swext xmerge
>
> I was wondering if there is any particular reason for using apache ant or
> if it would be a good idea to convert t
Thanks for the advice, I will keep this in mind.
Best,
Daniel
On 09/20/2011 03:44 PM, Rafael Dominguez wrote:
Just a little input about patch, nothing serious but its worth saying,
when checking if a container has elements, dont use the size() call
since its O(n) and not a constant call on so
Hi Stephan,
Stephan Bergmann schrieb:
Regina,
The below two commits fix warnings from code changed through a recent
commit by you, and in both cases I am a little unsure whether my fix is
good (see inline below).
I'm coding only in my spare time and have no deep insight into the code,
so it
Hello Jesse,
I tested on a small piece of code, "unused function" check works.
About "unused function", there is the file unusedcode.easy regularly
regenerated by Caolán. So I don't know.
I wonder too if "git updating" cppcheck would remove the false positive
"Boolean result is used in bitwise op
Use of apache ant in libreoffice seemes to be restricted to these 5
modules.
beanshell qadevOOo scripting swext xmerge
I was wondering if there is any particular reason for using apache ant or
if it would be a good idea to convert these modules to use plain gbuild
Jars?
Peter
___
2011/9/20 Lionel Elie Mamane
> On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 10:45:31PM +0200, CaStarCo wrote:
>
> > @Lionel , What is the QuadPart member of the structure? The high
> > part? the low part? or another thing?
>
> The union is fully described at
> http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa383713(v=vs.85)
Le 20/09/2011 17:31, Caolán McNamara a écrit :
On Sat, 2011-09-17 at 20:50 +0200, Julien Nabet wrote:
- to discuss about the fact it doesn't work if you've other version of
OpenSymbol (for example, I had the Debian package OpenSymbol and it
didn't worked until I uninstalled it)
Yeah, this is th
On Tue, 20 Sep 2011 20:32:57 +0200
Bjoern Michaelsen
wrote:
> As there is quite a bit of meddling involved, I would indeed prefer
> just a revert by now.
As discussed on IRC:
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/bootstrap/commit/?h=libreoffice-3-4&id=b6b7eb97b48937132638aeeef18270624201a930
Regina,
The below two commits fix warnings from code changed through a recent
commit by you, and in both cases I am a little unsure whether my fix is
good (see inline below).
On 09/20/2011 08:51 PM, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
chart2/source/view/main/ShapeFactory.cxx |1
cui/sourc
On Tue, 20 Sep 2011 00:10:29 -0500
Norbert Thiebaud
wrote:
> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=ff1c626fa1380c7af5a135f80b45de7e62025eed
That one got reverted on master and is replaced by:
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=17a2dcabe15f24567b5b68f92ede6
2011/9/20 Caolán McNamara :
> Hmm, if in normal mode I type in 3-4 I get that range previewed, change
> it to "foobar" and it stays previewing 3-4, which isn't great either
> really.
In normal layout in Writer and in any modes in other apps, i.e.
brochure layout in Writer is the only dissimilar pl
On Tue, 2011-09-20 at 14:25 +0400, Ivan Timofeev wrote:
> I'm glad to see my patches in master! :-) Thanks!
>
> 2011/9/20 Caolán McNamara :
> > I don't *think* we need to move the code around, the check for empty is
> > sufficient so I shrank it down to that bit.
>
> Hmm, when in "brochure" layou
Dne 20. září 2011 17:52 Tomáš Chvátal napsal(a):
> Attaching updated patch that enables just few of them, but mostly
> simplifies the logic in their detection cases.
>
> I left the scripting for beanshell and javascript disabled too :)
>
> Tom
>
Ow crap, I pused it now when i messed around with t
On Fri, 2011-09-09 at 15:26 +0200, Regina Henschel wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Final patch, now in one file :)
I just reviewed it and pushed to master. Sorry about the delay. The
past few weeks have been crazy due to our mail outage.
> Following problems are already in current LibO version and not ca
On 20/09/11 16:27, Caolán McNamara wrote:
On Tue, 2011-09-20 at 09:59 +0100, Noel Power wrote:
I'm looking for someone to bless/approve ( and or ) commit the patch to
the 3.4 branch
The only things outside of testtool which are touched look like an early
return from SbFormFactory::CreateObject
Attaching updated patch that enables just few of them, but mostly
simplifies the logic in their detection cases.
I left the scripting for beanshell and javascript disabled too :)
Tom
From a3299781af0b92a310a8d2f6e6a315cd08e5593a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tomas Chvatal
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2011
Just a little input about patch, nothing serious but its worth saying, when
checking if a container has elements, dont use the size() call since its
O(n) and not a constant call on some stl implementations, its preferred to
use empty().
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 7:51 PM, Daniel Di Marco wrote:
> H
On Tue, 2011-09-20 at 15:11 +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
> With LibO today, there is no real need for that split any longer, so it
> only complicates our code base. I would undo it in incremental steps
Sounds beautiful to me :-) [ though somewhat sad of course in general
]. Hopefully
On Tue, 2011-09-20 at 16:29 +0100, Michael Meeks wrote:
> ext-scripting-*
The python one is a goody of course, are the beanshell and rhino ones
compelling ?
C.
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org
On Sat, 2011-09-17 at 20:50 +0200, Julien Nabet wrote:
> - to discuss about the fact it doesn't work if you've other version of
> OpenSymbol (for example, I had the Debian package OpenSymbol and it
> didn't worked until I uninstalled it)
Yeah, this is the same problem that a lot of people ran in
On Tue, 2011-09-20 at 14:31 +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> I'm with rene on this one. All for enabling by default the ones like
> presenter screen, i.e. extensions which were really done as extensions
> in order to jump-start the original extensions repository with some
> "must haves"
R
On Tue, 2011-09-20 at 09:59 +0100, Noel Power wrote:
> I'm looking for someone to bless/approve ( and or ) commit the patch to
> the 3.4 branch
The only things outside of testtool which are touched look like an early
return from SbFormFactory::CreateObject if vba is enabled and a removed
HelpID f
On Fri, 2011-09-02 at 14:09 +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-09-02 at 14:44 +0200, Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I was wondering if it would be possible to create git repostiory for
> > libtextcat with all the fixes that are now applied. After such repo is
> > created it would b
On Tue, 2011-09-20 at 14:56 +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Third-party extensions should be buolt and distributed separetely if they
> can be built separately.
> I am OK with enabling those which are already in core, but please
> don't enable any of those which need extra stuff ./download'ed...
I'
As recently announced on #libreoffice-dev, I consider undoing the
basis/brand layer split. Historically, this was introduced at Sun to
make it possible for various products (plain OpenOffice.org, Brasilian
BrOffice re-branding, Sun's proprietary StarOffice, ...) to share code
that is only buil
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 02:25:47PM +0200, Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
> this patch enables building all the extensions by default instead of
> requiring user to run --enable-blabla.
> I enabled all extensions that do not pose any huge external deps,
> please let me know if you find it ok or if you fi
Hi guys,
this patch enables building all the extensions by default instead of
requiring user to run --enable-blabla.
I enabled all extensions that do not pose any huge external deps,
please let me know if you find it ok or if you find any issues, so I
could commit it to the master.
Cheers
Tom
Fr
I like the idea, personally.
I was toying with the idea of also have a target for fuzz testing
stuff. So that could be done at the same time too!
--
Marc-André Laverdière
Software Security Scientist
Innovation Labs, Tata Consultancy Services
Hyderabad, India
On Tue 20 Sep 2011 02:57:26 PM IST,
> I think this lines should (?) be moved below the newly introduced check.
*This* lines:
rPagePairs.clear();
rValidPagesSet.clear();
rValidStartFrms.clear();
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mail
I'm glad to see my patches in master! :-) Thanks!
2011/9/20 Caolán McNamara :
> I don't *think* we need to move the code around, the check for empty is
> sufficient so I shrank it down to that bit.
Hmm, when in "brochure" layout, try to input incorrect range and you
will see "No pages" on the pri
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 10:45:31PM +0200, CaStarCo wrote:
> @Lionel , What is the QuadPart member of the structure? The high
> part? the low part? or another thing?
The union is fully described at
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa383713(v=vs.85).aspx
Are you familiar with the concept of
On Sat, 2011-09-17 at 03:33 -0700, Ivan Timofeev wrote:
> This patch fixes crash when you input incorrect range of pages in "Print"
> dialog, "General" tab, "Pages" textfield and layout is set to "Brochure".
> http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/file/n3344034/Fix-for-fdo-35513.patch
> Fix-for-fdo
On 09/20/2011 10:11 AM, swagat sharma wrote:
I have generated a deb package of libreoffice using epm.
--enable-epm and with-package-format = deb
Now the package generated is installed by default in /opt directory.
How can I modify it to install in /usr/lib/ ?
Which variable to change/set?
Any
Hello all,
2011/9/20 Caolán McNamara
> On Mon, 2011-09-19 at 21:18 +0200, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
> > I am proposing introducing a new target in the build system called
> > "slowunitcheck". Those are tests that are technically unittests (need
> > no full install), but considered to slow/longrun
Hi Caolán,
On Tue, 20 Sep 2011 10:07:53 +0100
Caolán McNamara wrote:
> If the goal is to support e.g. calc guys rebuilding fast when hacking
> sc, the more natural approach to me would be an extra non-unit-test
> module-level target, e.g. cd sc; make skipchecks or some such, an
> explicit opt-ou
Hi,
The automation testtool thingy is broken on 3.4 ( and master too... but
that's a different story )
The root cause of the problem was caused by cws changehid which replaced
numerical hid's by strings and additionally removed the class SmartId.
The testtool code was adjusted ( but not complet
On Mon, 2011-09-19 at 21:18 +0200, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
> I am proposing introducing a new target in the build system called
> "slowunitcheck". Those are tests that are technically unittests (need
> no full install), but considered to slow/longrunning to be run on every
> build. Instead those a
Hi
I have generated a deb package of libreoffice using epm.
--enable-epm and with-package-format = deb
Now the package generated is installed by default in /opt directory.
How can I modify it to install in /usr/lib/ ?
Which variable to change/set?
Any ideas?
Also I want to checkout 3.4 branch
Hello, Daniel,
Thanks for this, I pushed it and removed a warning that showed its head.
Cheers and keep the good work
Fridrich
On Tue, 2011-09-20 at 00:21 +, Daniel Di Marco wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I replaced some usages of SvUShorts with std::vectors.
> License is LGPLv3+/MPL
>
>
> Cheers,
>
Hello, Daniel,
Thanks for this, I pushed it and removed a warning that showed its head.
Cheers and keep the good work
Fridrich
On Tue, 2011-09-20 at 00:21 +, Daniel Di Marco wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I replaced some usages of SvUShorts with std::vectors.
> License is LGPLv3+/MPL
>
>
> Cheers,
>
Hullo, Kevin
Thanks of the patch, pushed
List
On Mon, 2011-09-19 at 14:41 -0400, Kevin Hunter wrote:
> Hullo List,
>
> This patch adds a "clock" style progress, so one doesn't have to mouse
> over the Zenity icon to see where it currently stands.
>
> Very simple, very rudimentary, but alread
53 matches
Mail list logo
