On Tue, 2011-09-20 at 20:06 -0500, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: > On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 7:42 PM, Kohei Yoshida <kohei.yosh...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > What I like about ant is that you don't need to list every single java > > source file you need to compile, whereas in make you do (unless I'm > > missing something). That makes a huge difference and makes the ant > > build script very small regardless of the number of source files. > > That is true. Fortunately some of the piece we are talking about (like > the java stuff in scripting for instance) hardly every change. > the scripting/java directory has seen 23 commit in 3 1/2 years, only 2 > of them having a possible impact on the build (as in adding/removing > java files) > So that negative point may not be that much of a hurdle.
That is certainly true. Then I'll be okay with the removal of ant on those modules. > I haven't > checked for other modules, and I certainly agree that for > java-extensions and external java module like tomcat we probably don't > want to go that route... Yup. But wow, isn't tomcat a http server? What do we even use tomcat for? ;-) Kohei -- Kohei Yoshida, LibreOffice hacker, Calc _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
