Re: [Libreoffice] [steering-discuss] Hello! ... and lurking :-)

2011-06-03 Thread sophie
Hi Greg, On 04/06/2011 03:15, Greg Stein wrote: Hi all, I imagine you've all heard about the proposal[1] to contribute OO.o to the Apache Software Foundation. I've been involved with Apache for well over a decade, on its Board of Directors since 2001, its current Vice Chairman, the VP of Apache

Re: [Libreoffice] [GSOC] make install fails

2011-06-03 Thread Kohei Yoshida
On Sat, 2011-06-04 at 06:28 +0200, Markus Mohrhard wrote: > Hello Anurag, Kohei > > sadly it seems that the installation has not finished when the > smoketest runs. I have a similar problem that a unit test in > smoketest_native fails and as a result I have no working installation. > I have soffic

Re: [Libreoffice] [GSOC] make install fails

2011-06-03 Thread Markus Mohrhard
Hello Anurag, Kohei sadly it seems that the installation has not finished when the smoketest runs. I have a similar problem that a unit test in smoketest_native fails and as a result I have no working installation. I have soffice. bin but when I try to start it crashes after some seconds. I think

Re: [Libreoffice] [tdf-discuss] Proposal to join Apache OpenOffice

2011-06-03 Thread Greg Stein
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 22:06, Allen Pulsifer wrote: >... > Some of you may have noticed that Greg Stein, a member of the Apache > Software Foundation Board of Directors has joined this list and offered to > answer any questions.  Please feel free to ask him about anything that is on > your mind.  

Re: [Libreoffice] [GSOC] make install fails

2011-06-03 Thread Kohei Yoshida
Hello Anurag, On Sat, 2011-06-04 at 06:30 +0530, Anurag Jain wrote: > Hello there, > > I guess after a lot of changes LO build system, make install fails > for me. Here is the output http://pastebin.com/nNNyiV86 . So, I remember we had this discussion on IRC, and Tor gave you the advise that, i

[Libreoffice] Proposal to join Apache OpenOffice

2011-06-03 Thread Allen Pulsifer
Greetings All, Some of you will remember me as a long time member of the OpenOffice.org community. In fact, back in the day, it was sometimes just myself and Michael Meeks who were openly complaining on the OOo mailing list about Sun's handling of the "community" :-) I'm writing today about what

Re: [Libreoffice] Hello! ... and lurking :-)

2011-06-03 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 7:15 PM, Greg Stein wrote: > Hi all, > > > If you have any comments, questions, or concerns, then please feel > free to direct them my way (on whatever list). I'm here to listen and > understand, and to offer up answers where I can. I have a question: Why would Apache conte

[Libreoffice] [GSOC] make install fails

2011-06-03 Thread Anurag Jain
Hello there, I guess after a lot of changes LO build system, make install fails for me. Here is the output http://pastebin.com/nNNyiV86 . Also previously for me while doing a make here used to be 163 module (i.e. smoketestoo_native was not executed) and I was able to install it using make dev-in

[Libreoffice] Hello! ... and lurking :-)

2011-06-03 Thread Greg Stein
Hi all, I imagine you've all heard about the proposal[1] to contribute OO.o to the Apache Software Foundation. I've been involved with Apache for well over a decade, on its Board of Directors since 2001, its current Vice Chairman, the VP of Apache Subversion, and was the Chairman for five years. I

Re: [Libreoffice] A (new?) bug in LibreOffice 3.4 and a missing feature?

2011-06-03 Thread Luke Symes
Hello Axel, On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 7:35 PM, Axel Reimer wrote: > 2. There is mentioned a unity integration in the release notes of 3.4. > But the menus do not integrate in the global menu and I cannot find an > option in LibreOffice to do so. Is this feature really integrated? > see also: http:/

Re: [Libreoffice] Trouble building the redland module on mac

2011-06-03 Thread William Lachance
Hi Christian, On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 4:21 PM, Christian Lohmaier < lohmaier+libreoff...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > > On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 3:19 PM, Christian Lohmaier > > wrote: > On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 10:11 PM, William Lachance > wrote: > >> [...] > > LIBXML2LIB=$(LIBXML2LIB) > > That should

Re: [Libreoffice] Trouble building the redland module on mac

2011-06-03 Thread Christian Lohmaier
Hi William, *, On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 10:11 PM, William Lachance wrote: > On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 3:19 PM, Christian Lohmaier > wrote: >> [...] > LIBXML2LIB=$(LIBXML2LIB) That should not be LIBXML2LIB, but the LIBXML_LIBS as set by configure - I'm not sure wher LIBXML2LIB is defined... XSLTLIB

Re: [Libreoffice] Duplicate code: libs-core/framework/test/typecfg/cfgview.cxx

2011-06-03 Thread Chr. Rossmanith
Hi, binfilter can be omitted from simian? Christina Am 02.06.2011 22:07, schrieb Chr. Rossmanith: Hi, while waiting for a successful build I had a look at cfgview.cxx which has two very similar methods CFGView::impl_generateFilter{Modul}?ListHTML(). Shall I continue or is it "only" a test

Re: [Libreoffice] Trouble building the redland module on mac

2011-06-03 Thread Tor Lillqvist
> That is no more, I removed that with the libcroco cleanup :-) Ah ok. Need to pull;) >> And still another point is that we hardcode this >> /Developer/SDKs/MacOSX10.4u.sdk path > It has been quite some time since I installed XCode, but the only > choice I was offered is a startup volume, so n

Re: [Libreoffice] Trouble building the redland module on mac

2011-06-03 Thread William Lachance
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 4:01 PM, Christian Lohmaier < lohmaier+libreoff...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > And still another point is that we hardcode this > /Developer/SDKs/MacOSX10.4u.sdk path a couple of times in the configure.in, > but surely that software package can be installed in some other loca

Re: [Libreoffice] Trouble building the redland module on mac

2011-06-03 Thread William Lachance
Hi again Christian, On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 3:19 PM, Christian Lohmaier < lohmaier+libreoff...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > Can't we somehow make the redland smart enough to use the version of > libxml > > configure found at top-level? That seems to me to be the root cause of > the > > problem. > >

Re: [Libreoffice] Trouble building the redland module on mac

2011-06-03 Thread Christian Lohmaier
Hi Tor, *, On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 9:49 PM, Tor Lillqvist wrote: >> Easiest is to remove/hide the pkg-config utitily, so that configure >> doesn't even have a chance of detecing those "alien" libraries. > > Well, configure looks for libxml2 by running xml2-config, Ah, true, not sure what the exte

Re: [Libreoffice] Trouble building the redland module on mac

2011-06-03 Thread Tor Lillqvist
> Easiest is to remove/hide the pkg-config utitily, so that configure > doesn't even have a chance of detecing those "alien" libraries. Well, configure looks for libxml2 by running xml2-config, not pkg-config. (Check the use of PKG_CHECK_MODULES_MACHACK , from acinclude.m4.) And at least on 10.6

Re: [Libreoffice] Master build Seg faults in starmath test

2011-06-03 Thread John LeMoyne Castle
here is entire log of output in pastebin - I apologize for inlining it earlier http://pastebin.com/E4XuVt0M jlc -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Master-build-Seg-faults-in-starmath-test-tp3020219p3020979.html Sent from the Dev mailing list archive at Nabb

[Libreoffice] [patch] Bug 37889 - Adapt smoothing with splines to ODF1.2

2011-06-03 Thread Regina Henschel
Hi all, In ODF 1.2 [1] smoothing with splines is concretized. The spec now contains a detailed description, how this splines have to be calculated. [1] http://docs.oasis-open.org/office/v1.2/OpenDocument-v1.2-part1.odt The patches attached to bug 37889 implement this algorithms. The patches

Re: [Libreoffice] Trouble building the redland module on mac

2011-06-03 Thread Christian Lohmaier
Hi William, *, On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 9:13 PM, William Lachance wrote: > On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 3:03 PM, Christian Lohmaier > wrote: > > True. I guess we do have to keep in mind that people might have installed > stuff (like libxml) via MacPorts for other reasons. Ideally the build > wouldn't br

Re: [Libreoffice] Trouble building the redland module on mac

2011-06-03 Thread William Lachance
Hi Christian, On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 3:03 PM, Christian Lohmaier < lohmaier+libreoff...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > > (I used macports instead of manual installation but I got the impression > And actually using macports or fink or darwinports make it more > difficult to compile. > You're example

Re: [Libreoffice] Trouble building the redland module on mac

2011-06-03 Thread Tor Lillqvist
> I most definitely do have libxml2 installed on my system though (both one > installed by xcode and one by macports) and this was picked up by the > top-level configure. Most likely the macports one is confusing things. If you have a xml2-config in /opt/local/bin (as seems likely based on what

Re: [Libreoffice] Trouble building the redland module on mac

2011-06-03 Thread Christian Lohmaier
Hi William, *, On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 8:25 PM, William Lachance wrote: > > I've been attempting to get LibreOffice master built on my Mac running 10.6. > Per the instructions on the wiki, I installed XCode with the 10.4 SDK option > and the various ports mentioned here > http://wiki.documentfound

Re: [Libreoffice] Trouble building the redland module on mac

2011-06-03 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Will, First - awesome to see you here ! :-) welcome back. On Fri, 2011-06-03 at 14:25 -0400, William Lachance wrote: > I've been attempting to get LibreOffice master built on my Mac running > 10.6. Per the instructions on the wiki, I installed XCode with the > 10.4 SDK option and the v

[Libreoffice] Trouble building the redland module on mac

2011-06-03 Thread William Lachance
Hey, I've been attempting to get LibreOffice master built on my Mac running 10.6. Per the instructions on the wiki, I installed XCode with the 10.4 SDK option and the various ports mentioned here http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Install_Mac_OS_10.6.4_Dependencies(I used macports inst

[Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Re: [REVIEW 3.4] Crash in wizards

2011-06-03 Thread Jan Holesovsky
Hi Caolan, Caolán McNamara píše v Pá 03. 06. 2011 v 17:06 +0100: > > what I see here is an > > infinite recursion that of course ends at some stage - with a SIGSEGV: > > > The attached patch fixes that for me > > Seems sane to me. Thank you, pushed to libreoffice-3-4 with your sign-off. Regar

[Libreoffice] Master build Seg faults in starmath test

2011-06-03 Thread John LeMoyne Castle
I have pulled and built a couple of times in the last few days with a make clean in between on master. Was able to build in master on 28.5.2011 - now not so much I am getting a consistent failure at this point... [ build CUT ] starmath_qa_cppunit R=/home/jlcastle/LibOdev && S=$R/skky && O=$S/sol

Re: [Libreoffice] [REVIEW 3.4] Crash in wizards

2011-06-03 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Fri, 2011-06-03 at 15:13 +0200, Jan Holesovsky wrote: > This seems to be unrelated to the original report; Yeah, the first one is almost certainly my bug, but ideally a way to reproduce it outside of the java wizards would be available which would allow sticking valgrind on it. Its a glyph fal

Re: [Libreoffice] Need help with the Bug 33092 – Autocomplete display double character for this word [CTL / Thai]

2011-06-03 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Tue, 2011-05-31 at 20:07 +0700, Samphan Raruenrom wrote: So, I think you're on the right track with your experimental fix. I've attached a patch to the bug based off that, give it a go and see if it makes a difference. What's worth knowing is that on Windows the Input Methods provide the langu

[Libreoffice] [ANN] LibreOffice 3.3.3 RC1 available

2011-06-03 Thread Thorsten Behrens
Hi *, for 3.3.3 rc1, we're now uploading builds to a public (but non-mirrored - so don't spread news too widely!) place, as soon as they're available. Grab them here: http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/pre-releases/ If you've a bit of time, please give them a try & report *critical* bugs not yet

[Libreoffice] [REVIEW 3.4] Crash in wizards

2011-06-03 Thread Jan Holesovsky
Hi Caolan, all, https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36306 In Writer: - open "File/Wizards/Letter" - select "Formal Personal letter" radio button - press "Finish" button Boom! This seems to be unrelated to the original report; what I see here is an infinite recursion that of course end

[Libreoffice] [REVIEW] Re: [PATCH] Bug 36390 breaks html filter fixed

2011-06-03 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Thu, 2011-04-28 at 21:32 +0200, Chr. Rossmanith wrote: > Hi, > > my fix for bug 34666 has been too conservative. Now the test for > > HTML_UNKNOWNCONTROL_ON is removed and > > is treated correctly (c.f. bug 36390). I'm not sure whether > > there should be a test if the token is a "ONOFF" toke

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Simplify __DLLEXTENSION madness

2011-06-03 Thread Francois Tigeot
On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 01:22:20PM +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote: > On Fri, 2011-06-03 at 13:56 +0200, Francois Tigeot wrote: > > Fortunately it is only used by componentfactory.hxx > > Nah, it's also used by the SVLIBRARY define and other in solar.h which > get propagated around the place I've pus

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] [PATCH] Unify DLLPOSTFIX values

2011-06-03 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Fri, 2011-06-03 at 13:56 +0200, Francois Tigeot wrote: > Fortunately it is only used by componentfactory.hxx Nah, it's also used by the SVLIBRARY define and other in solar.h which get propagated around the place I've pushed mods to make that "lo" for windows, "lo.dylib" for macosx and lo.so for

Re: [Libreoffice] A (new?) bug in LibreOffice 3.4 and a missing feature?

2011-06-03 Thread Bernhard Dippold
Hi Axel, * Axel Reimer schrieb: Hello, I tried LibreOffice 3.4 for some days (using Ubuntu 11.04) and I recognized two things: 1. The menuicons are set to: size: Automatic style: Automatic (Tango) I went to the tools --> options -> View" and changed the icon style to "Galaxy (Standard)" and

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] [PATCH] Unify DLLPOSTFIX values

2011-06-03 Thread Francois Tigeot
On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 11:33:34AM +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote: > On Fri, 2011-06-03 at 08:43 +0200, Francois Tigeot wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 08:20:31PM +0200, Francois Tigeot wrote: > > > On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 07:00:56PM +0200, Francois Tigeot wrote: > > > > > > New and improved vers

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] [PATCH] Unify DLLPOSTFIX values

2011-06-03 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Fri, 2011-06-03 at 08:43 +0200, Francois Tigeot wrote: > On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 08:20:31PM +0200, Francois Tigeot wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 07:00:56PM +0200, Francois Tigeot wrote: > > > > New and improved version available here: > > This new patch pushed today. Hmm, I still see __D

[Libreoffice] writer uno api

2011-06-03 Thread Miklos Vajna
Hi, Today I noticed that the docx import ignores the '' paragraph property, and given that I miss it for the RTF import as well, I'm trying to figure out how to implement that. Here is what I found so far: - writerfilter: The ooxml tokenizer maps that property to NS_sprm::LN_PWAlignFont. - wri

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Re: [PATCH] Set GTK+ native mouse behaviour settings

2011-06-03 Thread Christian Dywan
Am Fri, 03 Jun 2011 10:30:30 +0100 schrieb Caolán McNamara: > Is there a confirmation email anywhere that states the lanedo > patches/submissions are under the LGPLv3+/MPL ? > > Its implied by > http://blog.documentfoundation.org/2011/05/31/lanedo-supports-libreoffice/ > I guess. I'm not sure if

Re: [Libreoffice] CTL settings for Hebrew (ctl_he.xcd)

2011-06-03 Thread Lior Kaplan
Thanks, you rock (: On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 11:44 AM, Caolán McNamara wrote: > On Sat, 2011-04-16 at 21:44 +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote: > > On Thu, 2011-04-14 at 10:56 +0300, Lior Kaplan wrote: > > > > > > > > Following your hint, here's the patch to fix #i61863. It disables > > > squence checki

[Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Re: [PATCH] Set GTK+ native mouse behaviour settings

2011-06-03 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Thu, 2011-04-28 at 12:40 +, Christian Dywan wrote: > This patch adds mouse behaviour settings for GTK+. > > Tested with for example double click time that renders me unable to double > click and works even without a restart. Nifty, I said to myself reading patches in threads unterminated

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] An updated Autolayout patch

2011-06-03 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Wed, 2011-04-20 at 02:36 -0700, cocofan wrote: > This is another updated set of Autolayout patches. I think I managed > to get the custom layout to work but sometimes there is a segmentation > fault connected with using a literal string (will investigate later). > The reading and writing to the

[Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Re: [PATCH] Display non printable characters on the end of line

2011-06-03 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Sat, 2011-04-30 at 01:19 +0200, Jan Holesovsky wrote: > Bartosz - can you please provide us with your full name, and also can > you confirm that your patch is under LGPLv3+ and MPL? I see this got pushed. Bartosz can you confirm the above question about LGPLv3+/MPL licensing of the patch ? C.

Re: [Libreoffice] Minutes of the tech. steering call

2011-06-03 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Thu, 2011-06-02 at 19:21 +0200, Jan Holesovsky wrote: > Preset: Norbert, Rainer, Kendy, Andras, David, Petr, Michael > > * AA done: > + post small, fast tab-cleanup C program for review ... (Norbert) It's threaded, I rule myself out from that :-) > + 3.5 schedule sanity check

Re: [Libreoffice] CTL settings for Hebrew (ctl_he.xcd)

2011-06-03 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Sat, 2011-04-16 at 21:44 +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote: > On Thu, 2011-04-14 at 10:56 +0300, Lior Kaplan wrote: > > > > > Following your hint, here's the patch to fix #i61863. It disables > > squence checking for CTL languages and enables it for Thai. > > So, here's what I suggest. As rene poi

[Libreoffice] A (new?) bug in LibreOffice 3.4 and a missing feature?

2011-06-03 Thread Axel Reimer
Hello, I tried LibreOffice 3.4 for some days (using Ubuntu 11.04) and I recognized two things: 1. The menuicons are set to: size: Automatic style: Automatic (Tango) I went to the tools --> options -> View" and changed the icon style to "Galaxy (Standard)" and clicked ok. Since the icons were to