Hello LibreOffice developers,
I already asked this question in the chat and in the users mailinglist,
but did not receive any reply at all, so I'm taking this to the
developers mailing list.
I can't get the LibreOffice SDK to work with DotNet on Windows. I always
run into the bug which is file
On Wed, 13 Apr 2011 00:58:42 +0200
Miklos Vajna wrote:
> > What improvement does the check have? You'd still fail here. The
> > same as before.
>
> It's about giving a reasonable error message early before people try
> to build with buggy junit which won't work.
Which is:
a) good for the LibreO
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 12:45:29AM +0200, Rene Engelhard
wrote:
> It looks OK code-wise, but TBH I don't see a sense in this. Distros should fix
> their jars, we shouldn't hide problems.
> And if the problem is widespread - so be it. One more reason to get distro
> maintainers fix it.
>
> What i
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 11:36:39AM +0200, Miklos Vajna wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 01:07:43PM +0200, Miklos Vajna
> wrote:
> > I'm attaching a patch that tries to implement this.
> >
> > I've tested with our (Frugalware) junit jar where the classpath is in
> > manifest and also with up
I found the file in /lib/i386-linux-gnu ...
Thanks for your help!
Now i'm trying to compile...
Balint
2011. április 12. 23:31 Bálint Dózsa írta, :
> From where you copied the libgcc_s.so.1?
>
> Regards,
> Balint Dozsa
>
> 2011. április 12. 22:49 Peter Jentsch írta, :
>
> I've encountered the sam
>From where you copied the libgcc_s.so.1?
Regards,
Balint Dozsa
2011. április 12. 22:49 Peter Jentsch írta, :
> I've encountered the same or a very similar problem and manually copied
> libgcc_s.so.1 to the external/gcc3_specific folder to work around it.
>
> Cheers
> Peter
>
>
>
>
> Am 11.04.20
Am Montag, den 11.04.2011, 10:48 +0100 schrieb Michael Meeks:
> Hi Peter,
>
> On Mon, 2011-04-11 at 00:11 +0200, Peter Jentsch wrote:
> Oh - completely :-) I'm not disagreeing, just trying to find someone
> who you can work with - so eg. which component: Calc, Writer, Impress
> are you most
I've encountered the same or a very similar problem and manually copied
libgcc_s.so.1 to the external/gcc3_specific folder to work around it.
Cheers
Peter
Am 11.04.2011 um 20:28 schrieb Bálint Dózsa :
> Hi,
>
> I need some help.
> I've got this problem:
>
> build -- version: 275224
>
>
Le 10/04/2011 23:42, Julien Nabet a écrit :
Hello,
I've got this problem :
maryline@maryline:~/compile-libreoffice/libo$ make -r clean && make
*
* Running the post download checks.
*
**
Am 11.04.2011 23:30, schrieb Michaël Lefèvre:
Actually, this was part of the easy hack "hunt and destroy obsolete
macros". As I have very little time (2h/week) to join the fun, and
taking some vacation for a month, I didn't "apply" to this on the
wiki. To any one, fill free to complete the task.
On Sun, 2011-04-10 at 23:42 +0200, Julien Nabet wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've got this problem :
> Fetching dependencies for module NULL from solver... failed
Fixed now, caused by foo NULL NULL in a prj/build.lst it has to be just
one NULL, i.e. foo NULL
C.
_
Removed last occurences of _USE_UNO, built successfully and pushed.
Christina
Am 12.04.2011 10:49, schrieb Noel Power:
On 11/04/11 15:55, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
Noel Power wrote:
As far as I understand the code it consists merely of test calls
to functions in order to see if they return a v
Hi Lubos,
On Tue, 12 Apr 2011 16:25:58 +0200
Lubos Lunak wrote:
> > solenv/inc/unxgcc.mk:LINKFLAGSOPTIMIZE*=-Wl,-O1
> No, I forgot to mention, that's not the one:
> [...]
This is because of the way the migration to gbuild started: By
"emulating" the compile/link commands of the old build syste
>From 2de03b6a40f6bfe9413a30914fbc26a01afc0969 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Robert Dargaud
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 18:09:28 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] fix bug #36069 - Date properties in 'Custom Properties' do not
scroll in UI
---
sfx2/source/dialog/dinfdlg.cxx |4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 in
Hi Caolán,
On Tue, 12 Apr 2011 15:34:24 +0100
Caolán McNamara wrote:
> I see that you ported the sc one over, thanks for that :-)
Yes, I also wanted to answer here, but could not find the thread
anymore ;)
Anyway: I also just cherrypicked that to 3-4 upon koheis request. I hope
I didnt break a
2011/4/12 Jan Holesovsky :
> Hi Andras,
>
> On 2011-04-12 at 10:37 +0200, Andras Timar wrote:
>
>> >> On git list we were recommended to use hook instead of filter. Please
>> >> review my patch. If you apply it, don't forget to remove po filter
>> >> lines from your git config.
>> >
>> > Looks OK.
Hi Andras,
On 2011-04-12 at 10:37 +0200, Andras Timar wrote:
> >> On git list we were recommended to use hook instead of filter. Please
> >> review my patch. If you apply it, don't forget to remove po filter
> >> lines from your git config.
> >
> > Looks OK. Kendy, does it sound acceptable for yo
Hello
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 19:27, Christina Roßmanith
wrote:
> Is there a way to search for all commits I've done so far? I'll finish
that, of course!
Maybe using search box in the top-right of the page like this works for you?
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/libs-core/log/?qt=author&
On Thu, 2011-04-07 at 14:06 +0200, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
> Doing something "custom" unfortunately has still way too much
> boilerplate in gbuild esp. for small tasks. You can find an example in
> tools where:
I see that you ported the sc one over, thanks for that :-)
C.
_
Ok Thorsten, i will check this. ;-)
Regards,
Júlio.
2011/4/12 Thorsten Behrens
> Júlio Hoffimann wrote:
> > Could i remove them automatically or is better to check for context?
> >
> Hi Júlio,
>
> the names can all go - just keep the bug id, as usual.
>
> > P.S.: What means 'OD' or 'FME' or 'PB
On Tuesday 12 of April 2011, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-04-12 at 16:01 +0200, Lubos Lunak wrote:
> > it. Almost five times the size of data is really a lot more data for I/O
> > to shuffle back and forth.
>
> I noticed recently that my linux --eanble-symbols solver is about 23gigs
> in s
On Tue, 2011-04-12 at 16:01 +0200, Lubos Lunak wrote:
> it. Almost five times the size of data is really a lot more data for I/O to
> shuffle back and forth.
I noticed recently that my linux --eanble-symbols solver is about 23gigs
in size, if it was e.g. half that I could play around with putting
Hello,
gbuild introduced using -ggdb3 for debugging information and I intend to
reduce that to -ggdb2. Let the numbers speak themselves:
789668K, 2:17 (-ggdb3)
vs
171074K, 1:06 (-ggdb2)
The first is size of libswlx.so, a binary from sw/ I picked at random, the
second is time needed to fin
Sophie Gautier píše v Po 11. 04. 2011 v 14:59 +0300:
> Hi Yifan,
> On 11/04/2011 13:59, Yifan Jiang wrote:
> > > 13:25< sophi> yifan: we distinguish between l10n and native
> > language teams,
> > > it's not the same members (even if it is the same language)
> >
> > Would you help
_USE_UNO: I thought, that I had removed everything #ifdef'ed with
_USE_UNO. BUT I've found some occurences in ./basic. Is there a way to
search for all commits I've done so far? I'll finish that, of course!
Christina
Am 12.04.2011 10:49, schrieb Noel Power:
On 11/04/11 15:55, Thorsten Behrens
Hello,
On Mon, 2011-04-11 at 15:05 -0400, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
> > I'm kinda in the same position as Rahul. I have send my proposal for
> > the port to Android but, as we are nearly at the end of the semester
> > I'm trying to find time to complete an easy hack for my propsal
> > between my multip
On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 10:31:09PM +0200, Francois Tigeot wrote:
>
> CVER is defined in set_solenv.in and propagated in form of defines to the
> entire source tree.
And is no longer used.
The attached patch removes it from the build infrastructure.
--
Francois Tigeot
>From 78be7ee6a51e6bf48edd
Hi Christina
On 09/04/11 22:08, Christina Roßmanith wrote:
[...]
So I'll remove the definition of PRE_CONDITION and POST_CONDITION and
replace the latter with OSL_POSTCOND (the former isn't used). ENSURE
will be replaced by OSL_ENSURE and DbgAssert removed. Any objections?
yeah, sounds reasonab
On Sat, 2011-04-09 at 22:53 +0200, Christina Roßmanith wrote:
> Finished and pushed. Next step: remove duplicates from vclenum.h and add
> #include fontenum.h from tools?
That would seem to be the reasonable approach to take. i.e.
vcl/prj/build.lst lists "tools" so tools is always build before vc
Noel Power wrote:
> I'm pretty sure Christina pushed the patch to do with the
> _OLD_FILE_IMPL
>
Yep, my bad - adding tag to thread then. Sorry for the noise.
Cheers,
-- Thorsten
pgp08Y4uApo2i.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
LibreOffice mailing lis
Michaël Lefèvre wrote:
> Actually, this was part of the easy hack "hunt and destroy obsolete
> macros". As I have very little time (2h/week) to join the fun, and
> taking some vacation for a month, I didn't "apply" to this on the
> wiki. To any one, fill free to complete the task.
>
Hi Michaël,
t
On 11/04/11 15:55, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
Noel Power wrote:
As far as I understand the code it consists merely of test calls
to functions in order to see if they return a valid result. I'm
quite sure that you already know whether it has side effects or
not... I vote for "it hasn't", but I'm abs
Júlio Hoffimann wrote:
> Could i remove them automatically or is better to check for context?
>
Hi Júlio,
the names can all go - just keep the bug id, as usual.
> P.S.: What means 'OD' or 'FME' or 'PB' or ... ?
>
Usernames of Sun/Oracle engineers. :)
Cheers,
-- Thorsten
pgpifjLGOI4Du.pgp
Des
2011/4/12 Miklos Vajna :
> On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 08:29:13PM +0200, Andras Timar
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Some of us experienced performance problems with the gitattributes
>> filter defined for .po files. The 'clean' filter were not only run on
>> commit, but also during clone/pull. This was not i
And the topic is messenger again :)
F
On 12/04/11 09:49, Francois Tigeot wrote:
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 12:07:23PM +0200, Fridrich Strba wrote:
The topic says it all
And that's good.
I have missed a few occurences. This next patch takes care of them.
_
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 12:07:23PM +0200, Fridrich Strba wrote:
> The topic says it all
And that's good.
I have missed a few occurences. This next patch takes care of them.
--
Francois Tigeot
>From b8bd0b7067b34dfed17efc7d535c561cb5d6e3c5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Francois Tigeot
Date: Tu
36 matches
Mail list logo
