Hi, On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 11:36:39AM +0200, Miklos Vajna wrote: > On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 01:07:43PM +0200, Miklos Vajna > <vmik...@frugalware.org> wrote: > > I'm attaching a patch that tries to implement this. > > > > I've tested with our (Frugalware) junit jar where the classpath is in > > manifest and also with upstream junit jar, which bundles hamcrest. > > > > OK to push to libreoffice-3-4? > > Rene, does this look OK? (Bjoern said an IRC that it looks fine to him, > but let's wait an ACK from you before pushing.)
It looks OK code-wise, but TBH I don't see a sense in this. Distros should fix their jars, we shouldn't hide problems. And if the problem is widespread - so be it. One more reason to get distro maintainers fix it. What improvement does the check have? You'd still fail here. The same as before. Grüße/Regards, René -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' r...@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: D03E3E70 `- Fingerprint: E12D EA46 7506 70CF A960 801D 0AA0 4571 D03E 3E70 _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
