On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 12:45:29AM +0200, Rene Engelhard <r...@debian.org> 
wrote:
> It looks OK code-wise, but TBH I don't see a sense in this. Distros should fix
> their jars, we shouldn't hide problems.
> And if the problem is widespread - so be it. One more reason to get distro
> maintainers fix it.
> 
> What improvement does the check have? You'd still fail here. The same as
> before.

It's about giving a reasonable error message early before people try to
build with buggy junit which won't work.

Anyway it's up to you - it was just a suggestion from Bjoern.

Attachment: pgpWmiWC2Gzit.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Reply via email to