Hi Miklos,
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 12:14:51AM +0100, Miklos Vajna wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 11:41:38PM +0100, Francois Tigeot
> wrote:
> >
> > The attached patch replaces the strange and broken lookup logic
> > present in the script by a single 'which' command.
>
> Won't this case a war
On Sat, 26 Mar 2011 16:33:39 -0700, Bernhard Dippold
wrote:
Hi Rafael, all!
I don't know if you have noticed Octavio's reply (it raised your mail to
visibility again), because he didn't CC you, what seems to be usual here
on this list (in opposite to any other LibreOffice list).
I put hi
Hi Miklos, all,
thanks for this feature!
Complex style modifications will become much easier this way, when you
don't need to close the window every time you want to have a look at the
changes.
Is somebody of the documentation team aware of such changes, so it might
be included in the next
Hi Rafael, all!
I don't know if you have noticed Octavio's reply (it raised your mail to
visibility again), because he didn't CC you, what seems to be usual here
on this list (in opposite to any other LibreOffice list). If not, here
is a link:
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffic
Hello,
Concerning the easyhack "Strip include guards in idl files", I pushed 2
patches for the directory "ure/udkapi".
For the first patch I only used the strip-guards script with just a
change to apply for idl + remove of the "includes" block between the 2
final "Find".
Then to check it
On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 11:41:38PM +0100, Francois Tigeot
wrote:
> I've recently been bitten by the 'download' script, which was
> unable to use curl, even tough it is in my $PATH.
>
> The attached patch replaces the strange and broken lookup logic
> present in the script by a single 'which' com
Hi all,
I've recently been bitten by the 'download' script, which was
unable to use curl, even tough it is in my $PATH.
The attached patch replaces the strange and broken lookup logic
present in the script by a single 'which' command.
If there is no objection, I'll push this patch in a few days.
It seems that python scripting is not working in dev300m103 as it was
the case with LibO 3.3.0
(https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33355). (Maybe the fix is
not in 3.4 yet?)
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http
2011/3/26 Francois Tigeot :
>> As far as I can tell, jpropex has been never used in OpenOffice.org
>> localization. But it does not mean that it will not be used in the
>> future. It is quite new code. See #i100854# and #i112394#. We might
>> need it for the proper localization of Oracle Report Bui
On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 05:41:20PM +0100, Andras Timar wrote:
> 2011/3/26 Francois Tigeot :
> >
> > Shouldn't l10ntools/java/jpropex be removed then ?
> > Or the whole l10ntoos/java directory while we're at it ?
>
> Good question.
> java/l10nconv and java/receditor are not even build (they are not
Hi all,
after disabling another bunch of tests (most of them for 35693),
running the "subsequenttest" command should now complete without errors
on master (with the tests in the old and in the new build system).
Anything popping up there now is a regression.
Best Regards,
Bjoern
(*) https://bu
2011/3/26 Francois Tigeot :
> On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 04:06:04PM +0100, Andras Timar wrote:
>>
>> I disabled jpropex in localize.cxx. It tries to extract localizable
>> strings from .properties files but currently we don't have any
>> localizable .properties files in LibreOffice source code. So it
On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 12:42:36AM +0100, Miklos Vajna
wrote:
> Ah, I didn't see it. We talked about this with Cedric and he explained
> an idea which avoids any modification in vcl, so I'm not planning to
> push this version, a better one will come soon.
>
> The main problem is not with the mod
On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 04:06:04PM +0100, Andras Timar wrote:
>
> I disabled jpropex in localize.cxx. It tries to extract localizable
> strings from .properties files but currently we don't have any
> localizable .properties files in LibreOffice source code. So it is
> pretty useless.
Shouldn't l
RGB.ES wrote:
> A really old OOo request is issue 972:
> http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=972 "Alignment of baselines
> of formula and text in writer" ...
> The dev versions for OOo 3.4 include a patch (see original OOo issue) that
> fix this 9 years old problem. Will this patch be
Hi Florian,
On Sat, 26 Mar 2011 13:48:44 +0100
Florian Effenberger
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am not subscribed to this list (already have enough mails :-) so
> please Cc me in replies.
>
> IIRC, in the current 3.3.2 release, the presenter console does not
> allow someone to "reset" the time counter.
2011.03.26. 9:17 keltezéssel, Francois Tigeot írta:
> Hi,
>
> I'm doing my LibreOffice builds in a chroot with no java version installed
> and with --without-java passed to autogen.sh (platform is Unix, not Windows)
>
> I was quite surprised to see something was trying to run a 'java' executable
A really old OOo request is issue 972:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=972 "Alignment of baselines
of formula and text in writer"
This was also reported for LibO
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32241
The dev versions for OOo 3.4 include a patch (see original OOo issue
Hi,
I am not subscribed to this list (already have enough mails :-) so
please Cc me in replies.
IIRC, in the current 3.3.2 release, the presenter console does not allow
someone to "reset" the time counter. When you start a presentation and
have the title slide running for a few minutes befor
Hi Michael,
On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 19:49:29 +0100
Bjoern Michaelsen
wrote:
> > and we also have a 3.4 blocker bug here:
> > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673 that might be
> > nice to have those tracked on.
>
> Done.
I just reverted that because of fierce resistance. ;)
Instead
Hi all,
since finding EasyHacks by the bug title is somewhat hacky, I added
"EasyHack" as a whiteboard status to all current ones and switched the
query on the wiki to use that instead.
Best Regards,
Bjoern
--
https://launchpad.net/~bjoern-michaelsen
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hi Albert,
the GNU make infrastructure is rather new and I'm not famliar with it,
yet. I'm forwarding this to the list, maybe somebody there can help you
with that.
Best regards,
Peter
Am Samstag, den 26.03.2011, 13:18 +0200 schrieb Albert Zaharovits:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for your quick answ
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673
Björn Michaelsen changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.freedesktop.or
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673
Björn Michaelsen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on|35661 |
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673
Björn Michaelsen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on|35666 |
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673
Björn Michaelsen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on|35660 |
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673
Björn Michaelsen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on|35667 |
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673
Björn Michaelsen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on|35657 |
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673
Björn Michaelsen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on|35663 |
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673
Björn Michaelsen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on|35662 |
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.
Hi,
I'm doing my LibreOffice builds in a chroot with no java version installed
and with --without-java passed to autogen.sh (platform is Unix, not Windows)
I was quite surprised to see something was trying to run a 'java' executable
and failed.
Since the build output wasn't very useful, I created
On 26-03-11 01:04, Rob Snelders wrote:
Anyhow - I've pushed it; can you confirm it is licensed
LGPLv3+/MPL ?
Yes, it is licensed under LGPLv3+/MPL
Greetings,
Rob Snelders
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.
32 matches
Mail list logo