On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 05:41:20PM +0100, Andras Timar wrote: > 2011/3/26 Francois Tigeot <ftig...@wolfpond.org>: > > > > Shouldn't l10ntools/java/jpropex be removed then ? > > Or the whole l10ntoos/java directory while we're at it ? > > Good question. > java/l10nconv and java/receditor are not even build (they are not in > build.lst) so removing them is not risky.
OK. > As far as I can tell, jpropex has been never used in OpenOffice.org > localization. But it does not mean that it will not be used in the > future. It is quite new code. See #i100854# and #i112394#. We might > need it for the proper localization of Oracle Report Builder > extension. I thought the plan was to remove as much java dependencies as possible. Introducing new ones would be a pretty bad move IMHO. What are these #i100854# and #i112394# references ? I didn't find anything named like this in bugzilla. -- Francois Tigeot _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
