[Libreoffice] Need translation and to define the expected behaviour for fdo#34072

2011-02-16 Thread Julien Nabet
Hello, This pb is about "Protected cells can not be modified" using Replace on unprotected cell. I try to understand the process and I found that this error message comes from : sc/source/ui/view/viewfun2.cxx in the function SearchAndReplace. It could be helpful to have the english translation

Re: [Libreoffice] cppcheck headers problem? (was 'Question about cppcheck "unused private"')

2011-02-16 Thread someone
On 02/16/11 12:43, Caolán McNamara wrote: > On Sat, 2011-02-12 at 13:26 +0100, Julien Nabet wrote: >> Hello >> >> With the last git version of cppcheck, I've got in the master branch >> writer/sw/source/ui/dbui this : >> [./dbmgr.cxx:222]: (style) Unused private function >> 'SwConnectionDisposedL

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Remove legacy Addin mechanism from calc

2011-02-16 Thread Kohei Yoshida
On Tue, 2011-02-15 at 22:43 +, Alfonso Eusebio wrote: > Hi, > > Please find attached two patches for the removal of the legacy Addin > Mechanism > from calc. So, I'm not entirely comfortable removing this mechanism *just yet*. Looking at several issues in the OOo bug trackers there are stil

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] [PUSHED] Translation of German comment in libs-core/desktop

2011-02-16 Thread Kohei Yoshida
Accidentally replied only to Albert (not used to using gmail to manage mailing lists). This patch is pushed to master. Kohei ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: [Libreoffice] Build logs from the tinderbox

2011-02-16 Thread Christian Lohmaier
Hi Kendy, *, sorry for not replying earlier On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 4:35 PM, Jan Holesovsky wrote: > On 2011-02-10 at 15:34 +0100, Christian Lohmaier wrote: >>> >> http://tinderbox.go-oo.org/MASTER/status.html >> >> use "master" as treename, apart from that, see >> http://wiki.services.openoffic

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] Translation of German comment in libs-core/desktop

2011-02-16 Thread Albert Thuswaldner
Hi, Found one single German comment in libs-core/desktop which I have translated. Made a few additional clean-ups (one spelling corrections and remove out commented code in about 13 places) Small patch, should be easy to review. You can commit the patch under the terms of MPL 1.1 / GPLv3+ / LGPLv

Re: [Libreoffice] How to build a multi-lang installer on Windows

2011-02-16 Thread Tor Lillqvist
> Is there any specific steps one has to take in order to build a > multi-lang installer? dmake openoffice_en-US,ja in instsetoo_native/util does it. (Or maybe the target is openoffice_en,ja if your friend used ---with-lang="en ja".) --tml ___ Libre

Re: [Libreoffice] WIN16 references

2011-02-16 Thread Tor Lillqvist
>> Looking at your diffs for the SCO stuff, I found a _WIN16 test. Look for WIN , too, that is OOo-speak for 16-bit Windows. (NT-based Windows it calls WNT.) You will find *much* of that. Some files that have #ifdef WIN blocks, then *inside* those have tests for WNT. WIN and WNT can never be bot

[Libreoffice] Question concerning comment / translation

2011-02-16 Thread Christina Roßmanith
Hi, is the output of DBG_ASSERT read? Might it be useful to focus translation work to German strings used in DBG_ASSERT calls? Or might it be useful to have a list of files which are more interesting to translate than others ("Request for translation of comments", somewhere in the wiki)?

Re: [Libreoffice] Announcement: StarOffice file-format not available any more for saving

2011-02-16 Thread Pierre-André Jacquod
Hello, after quite a long time, I have done a push again concerning this topic. Sorry, I was very busy at work and had barely the time to go ahead. Here is the following work in cleaning within binfilter/bf_sw the code allowing to write in StarWriter format. Without touching dependencies outside

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] [PUSHED] fixed spelling menues -> menus

2011-02-16 Thread Christina Roßmanith
Hi David, Am 16.02.2011 07:56, schrieb David Tardon: On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 08:42:42PM +0100, Christina Roßmanith wrote: diff --git a/svtools/source/config/menuoptions.cxx b/svtools/source/config/menuoptions.cxx index a12f1e0..4e814a7 100644 --- a/svtools/source/config/menuoptions.cxx +++ b/

Re: [Libreoffice] WIN16 references

2011-02-16 Thread Thomas Arnhold
On 02/16/2011 09:53 PM, Francois Tigeot wrote: > On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 09:15:37PM +0100, Thomas Arnhold wrote: >> >> in the meantime I removed HPUX and SCO support. > > Looking at your diffs for the SCO stuff, I found a _WIN16 test. > > It seems many files are infected with WIN16 references, mo

Re: [Libreoffice] WIN16 references

2011-02-16 Thread Thomas Arnhold
On 02/16/2011 09:53 PM, Francois Tigeot wrote: > On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 09:15:37PM +0100, Thomas Arnhold wrote: >> >> in the meantime I removed HPUX and SCO support. > > Looking at your diffs for the SCO stuff, I found a _WIN16 test. > > It seems many files are infected with WIN16 references, mo

Re: [Libreoffice] WIN16 references

2011-02-16 Thread Francois Tigeot
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 09:15:37PM +0100, Thomas Arnhold wrote: > > in the meantime I removed HPUX and SCO support. Looking at your diffs for the SCO stuff, I found a _WIN16 test. It seems many files are infected with WIN16 references, most of them in ure, components and libs-gui. I never would

[Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Re: [PATCH] Use GDK_HAND2 mouse cursor instead of GDK_HAND1

2011-02-16 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Sat, 2011-02-12 at 10:34 +0900, KUROSAWA, Takeshi wrote: > Hi Caolán, > > On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 5:46 AM, Caolán McNamara wrote: > > I wonder why I don't see this behaviour locally. If I type a url in > > writer or impress and then put my mouse over it I get the same hand as I > > see in gimp

Re: [Libreoffice] Question about cppcheck "unused private"

2011-02-16 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Sat, 2011-02-12 at 13:26 +0100, Julien Nabet wrote: > Hello > > With the last git version of cppcheck, I've got in the master branch > writer/sw/source/ui/dbui this : > [./dbmgr.cxx:222]: (style) Unused private function > 'SwConnectionDisposedListener_Impl::disposing' > I don't understand th

[Libreoffice] How to build a multi-lang installer on Windows

2011-02-16 Thread Kohei Yoshida
Hi there, Someone from the Japanese list is interested in building a multi-lang installer on Windows, especially one whose installer displays a localized language and whose UI is also in the locale language after it's installed. He tried with --with-lang="en ja", but that resulted with two separa

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Remove OSF/1 support

2011-02-16 Thread Francois Tigeot
Hi Thomas, On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 09:15:37PM +0100, Thomas Arnhold wrote: > > in the meantime I removed HPUX and SCO support. Found out, that > osarch.pm is pretty unused ;) Seems like good ideas are common these days :-) -- Francois Tigeot ___ Libr

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] [PATCH] Remove unused macro

2011-02-16 Thread Thomas Arnhold
On 02/16/2011 03:40 PM, Francois Tigeot wrote: > On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 01:06:47PM +, Caolán McNamara wrote: >> On Wed, 2011-02-16 at 13:03 +0100, Francois Tigeot wrote: >>> On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 08:55:12AM +, Caolán McNamara wrote: >>> >>> Are the UUID_SYSTEM_TIME_RESOLUTION_100NS_TICKS

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Remove OSF/1 support

2011-02-16 Thread Thomas Arnhold
Hi Francois, in the meantime I removed HPUX and SCO support. Found out, that osarch.pm is pretty unused ;) I didn't touch libs-extern(-sys) and dmake, too. Your patchset looks good. Thomas On 02/16/2011 08:49 PM, Francois Tigeot wrote: > The attached patches remove OSF/1 support from the build

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Remove dead code

2011-02-16 Thread Thomas Arnhold
Great! Pushed it! Thanks. Thomas On 02/16/2011 07:16 PM, Bálint Dózsa wrote: > Hi, > > I have removed some dead code form //xml2cmp, /xmlhelp/ and //xmloff/. > My code is under the LGPLv3+/MPL dual license. > > Regards, > Balint Dozsa > > > > ___ >

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] [REVIEW] cairo canvas regression

2011-02-16 Thread Thorsten Behrens
Radek Doulík wrote: > I have fixed regression in cairo canvas, where points outside valid > range were accessed while rendering closed polygons. I would like to > push it to libreoffice-3-3 branch - 1 review wanted. > Good catch, ACKed & cherry-picked for -3-3 -- Thorsten pgp6gkK8OJB2M.pgp Desc

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] Remove OSF/1 support

2011-02-16 Thread Francois Tigeot
The attached patches remove OSF/1 support from the build system and some application code. There are still OSF1 references in the following files: libs-extern/libtextcat/libtextcat-2.2.patch libs-extern/libxmlsec/xmlsec1-update-config-sub-and-guess.patch libs-extern-sys/python/Python-2.6.1-

[Libreoffice] Remove dead code

2011-02-16 Thread Bálint Dózsa
Hi, I have removed some dead code form */xml2cmp, /xmlhelp* and */xmloff*. My code is under the LGPLv3+/MPL dual license. Regards, Balint Dozsa From d0e63ce6f07fac833c2c44b8ab1333229291127d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?B=C3=A1lint=20D=C3=B3zsa?= Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 18:58:05 +0100

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Remove legacy Addin mechanism from calc

2011-02-16 Thread Alfonso Eusebio
Hi Regina, I understand that this addin mechanism was used to add functions to calc. I wasn't aware of whether it was used that much. The general consensus, before implementing the patch, was that it wasn't probably used that much. In fact, it was marked and "deprecated" back in 2006. However,

[Libreoffice] [REVIEW] cairo canvas regression

2011-02-16 Thread Radek Doulík
Hi all, I have fixed regression in cairo canvas, where points outside valid range were accessed while rendering closed polygons. I would like to push it to libreoffice-3-3 branch - 1 review wanted. http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/libs-gui/commit/?id=a898a8cb077c05b1085da8254e66f61aa265b7d

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Remove unused macro

2011-02-16 Thread Francois Tigeot
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 01:06:47PM +, Caolán McNamara wrote: > On Wed, 2011-02-16 at 13:03 +0100, Francois Tigeot wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 08:55:12AM +, Caolán McNamara wrote: > > > > Are the UUID_SYSTEM_TIME_RESOLUTION_100NS_TICKS defines in > > sal/inc/rtl/uuid.h a part of that

Re: [Libreoffice] Supported arches

2011-02-16 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Wed, 2011-02-16 at 13:03 +0100, Francois Tigeot wrote: > On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 08:55:12AM +, Caolán McNamara wrote: > > On the low-power topic there's some medium-level hacks to try and remove > > the "unending timers" that LibreOffice still has that keep waking up the > > CPU and eating b

Re: [Libreoffice] Supported arches

2011-02-16 Thread Francois Tigeot
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 08:55:12AM +, Caolán McNamara wrote: > On the low-power topic there's some medium-level hacks to try and remove > the "unending timers" that LibreOffice still has that keep waking up the > CPU and eating battery life if that's an interest for you. Are the UUID_SYSTEM_TI

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] [PUSHED] fixed spelling menues -> menus

2011-02-16 Thread David Tardon
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 07:56:06AM +0100, David Tardon wrote: > On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 08:42:42PM +0100, Christina Roßmanith wrote: > > > diff --git a/svtools/source/config/menuoptions.cxx > > b/svtools/source/config/menuoptions.cxx > > index a12f1e0..4e814a7 100644 > > --- a/svtools/source/conf

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] [PUSHED] fixed spelling menues -> menus

2011-02-16 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Wed, 2011-02-16 at 07:56 +0100, David Tardon wrote: > I have removed the changes related to these properties. The property > names are documented and used at other places, so we cannot just change > them. Any use i wonder to mark misspellings we're "stuck" with with (sic) or something ? C. __

[Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Re: [PATCH] Missing DragonFly file

2011-02-16 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Wed, 2011-02-16 at 09:38 +0100, Francois Tigeot wrote: > Well, it's not really a patch but a new file. > This is the last missing piece to complete a build on DragonFly. > > It should be put into bootstrap/solenv/inc/ Sure, pushed. C. ___ LibreOffi

Re: [Libreoffice] Supported arches

2011-02-16 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Wed, 2011-02-16 at 11:34 +0100, Thomas Arnhold wrote: > Removed SINIX and HP9000 (except for bootstrap). So HP-UX could be > removed as well? Yeah, like I mentioned in some other mail, the only platforms that can possibly function are the ones that have a bridge in bridges/source/cpp_uno. SCO c

Re: [Libreoffice] LibreOffice is free of STLport

2011-02-16 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Thu, 2011-02-10 at 10:15 +, Caolán McNamara wrote: > On Thu, 2011-02-10 at 09:28 +, Michael Meeks wrote: > > Anyhow - overall a positive move no doubt. > > The biggest win, for me anyway, is that the beginning-to-become unwieldy > "magic header to mix stlport c++ and system c++ libr

Re: [Libreoffice] Supported arches

2011-02-16 Thread Francois Tigeot
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 11:34:28AM +0100, Thomas Arnhold wrote: > > > > I suppose we'll have to make such a list. All the Linux ports should > > remain, as should the BSDbased ones, MacOSX, Windows, Solaris and AIX as > > they work and are complete. The reality of what has a chance of working > >

Re: [Libreoffice] Supported arches

2011-02-16 Thread Thomas Arnhold
On 02/15/2011 10:28 PM, Caolán McNamara wrote: > On Tue, 2011-02-15 at 22:22 +0100, Francois Tigeot wrote: >> Of the ports listed on http://porting.openoffice.org/ , Tru64 is dead and >> I would be surprised if VMS and Linux/m68k were much alive. > > Yeah, only take the "completed" one, VMS and Tr

Re: [Libreoffice] Supported arches

2011-02-16 Thread Thomas Arnhold
Hi, >> And another thing, in combination with GCC: "C272" (occurs with GCC) >> i.e. at impress/sd/source/ui/view/zoomlist.cxx:#if ( defined GCC && >> defined C272 ) . Doesn't look that this is set anymore. > > Yeah, you got me there. No idea where C272 came from. I strongly suspect > it was set t

Re: [Libreoffice] Files without Copyright notice

2011-02-16 Thread Thomas Arnhold
Hi Caolán, I'm looking ahead this at the weekend. Maybe it's worth a task to write a little lint script which checks if new files have a copyright header. Thomas On 02/14/2011 10:10 PM, Caolán McNamara wrote: > On Mon, 2011-02-14 at 22:02 +0100, Thomas Arnhold wrote: >> You're right with ww8tool

Re: [Libreoffice] Files without Copyright notice

2011-02-16 Thread Thomas Arnhold
Yeah, thanks for fixing them :) Thomas On 02/16/2011 09:36 AM, Noel Power wrote: > Hi Thomas, > On 14/02/11 21:02, Thomas Arnhold wrote: >> On 02/14/2011 09:32 PM, Caolán McNamara wrote: >>> On Mon, 2011-02-14 at 19:45 +0100, Thomas Arnhold wrote: >> Yes, some of them. I've corrected the list. Ma

Re: [Libreoffice] Undo Redo Re: [REVIEW] Re: SmNodeToTextVisitor Fixes

2011-02-16 Thread Jonas Finnemann Jensen
Hi Luke, Here's the redo of this patch :) Cool, pushed... :) This is a nice step towards getting it stable... If you like searching code and guessing what might be the right solution, copy/paste integration could be next... By the way, let me know if you've any ideas on how formatting should wo

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] Missing DragonFly file

2011-02-16 Thread Francois Tigeot
Well, it's not really a patch but a new file. This is the last missing piece to complete a build on DragonFly. It should be put into bootstrap/solenv/inc/ -- Francois Tigeot # Version: MPL 1.1 / GPLv3+ / LGPLv3+ # # The contents of this file are subject to the Mozilla Public License Version # 1.

Re: [Libreoffice] Files without Copyright notice

2011-02-16 Thread Noel Power
Hi Thomas, On 14/02/11 21:02, Thomas Arnhold wrote: On 02/14/2011 09:32 PM, Caolán McNamara wrote: On Mon, 2011-02-14 at 19:45 +0100, Thomas Arnhold wrote: Yes, some of them. I've corrected the list. Many of them don't have copyright in OOo, too. I've updated the bug. And attached a file to thi

Re: [Libreoffice] Build logs from the tinderbox

2011-02-16 Thread Jan Holesovsky
Hi Christian, On 2011-02-10 at 16:35 +0100, Jan Holesovsky wrote: > > > Wouldn't it make sense to have the N last build logs on the web > > > somewhere, and just point to the relevant one in the tinderbox mail? > > > > http://tinderbox.go-oo.org/MASTER/status.html > > > > use "master" as treen