>> http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/LibreOffice/FindTheExpert
> I couldn't find Michael Meeks on the list.
But you apparently know about him anyway, so what is the problem? Does the page
say that it would be the One and True List of All Experts, and that there are
No Other Experts?
--
Nguyen Vu Hung wrote:
> 1. My apologies if this has been posted
>http://www.openoffice.org/security/bulletin.html
>Did we get them fixed in 3.3.0?
>
Hi,
yes, since we've merged all code from OOo 3.3.0 (with the exception
of one rather broken calc fix).
> 2. IMO, we need a security team,
Hello all,
1. My apologies if this has been posted
http://www.openoffice.org/security/bulletin.html
Did we get them fixed in 3.3.0?
2. IMO, we need a security team, probably made up from some
QA and dev members.
-> http://www.libreoffice.org/get-involved/
--
Best Regards,
Nguyen H
On Fri, 2011-02-04 at 10:46 +0100, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
> Joel Björkman wrote:
> > I read on www.libreoffice.org that it's best to file bugs to this
> > mailinglist. So here's one.
> >
> Hi Joel,
>
> um, where did you read that on libreoffice.org - we'd need to fix it
> there, because it's not
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 11:05 AM, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-02-07 at 02:29 +0700, Nguyen Vu Hung wrote:
>> m$ excel allows content in cells a1, a3, a5 to be selected and copied
>> >> to a7, a9, a11. This is not possible in calc. A feature request
>> >> please.
>
> http://wiki.documentfoun
On Mon, 2011-02-07 at 02:29 +0700, Nguyen Vu Hung wrote:
> m$ excel allows content in cells a1, a3, a5 to be selected and copied
> >> to a7, a9, a11. This is not possible in calc. A feature request
> >> please.
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Easy_Hacks#Allow_copy_and_paste_of_mult
Can someone review the patch to go to libreoffce-3-3, please.
On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 2:09 AM, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-02-04 at 09:44 +, Michael Meeks wrote:
> > Caolan - are you happy for this:
> >
> > commit 6c01edfe66d6e350b20178d9ab367806d956cb46
> > Author: Caolán McN
On 02/07/11 01:37, David Tardon wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 06, 2011 at 09:42:46PM +0100, Xisco Faulí wrote:
>> -} section[SECTIONS];
>> +} section[SECTIONS] = NULL;
>
> This is false alarm. The struct has default constructor, so the elements
> of the array are initialized properly.
>
>> +
Hello, I'll try this again:
I'm getting, first, warnings about declarations that have been previously
defined.
"warning: this is the location of the previous definition"
and finally a number of errors about a operators missing. Following is the
complete output.
Please let me know if
Hi,
I have attached a patch in which the German comments are translated to
English where needed. Also removed some useless comments and empty lines.
It covers the linguistic-, vbahelper-, ucb-directories in the
lib-core-directory of the source.
This patch is submitted under LGPLv3+/MPL-Lice
I've made some changes to the hierarchical structure of the page and
added an alphabetical list of directories&repositories in clone/. Please
check whether I'm taking the right direction.
Christoph
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freede
On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 10:33:00PM +0100, Miklos Vajna
wrote:
> Automatic git commit --amend is really dangerous, I would not do it.
> It's not an accident non-fastforwards are rejected while pushing.
It turns out I misunderstood it, I thought this is about git commit
--amend in the repos, not i
On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 12:18:39PM -0600, Norbert Thiebaud
wrote:
> The problem of the tinderbox approach is the coarse granularity (it is
> not uncommon to have 1/2 a dozen or more of independent commit between
> 2 build, the reliability (tinderbox sometime are down and this is not
> necessarily
Hi,
Here is a small patch which translates the comments in the
eventattacher from German to English
--
Greetings,
Rob Sneldersdiff --git a/eventattacher/source/eventattacher.cxx b/eventattacher/source/eventattacher.cxx
index 6cae50e..7599431 100644
--- a/eventattacher/source/eventattacher.cxx
On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 07:33:05PM +0100, Christina Roßmanith
wrote:
> I'm 3 commits ahead at home. But I have only the license to push the
> middle one on my own. How can I do that?!?
Using git rebase -i. See its manpage, you can reorder the commits so
that the middle one will be the first, th
Hi all,
Similarly to the release of 3.3.0, we have created a branch for the
stabilization of the 3.3.1, called 'libreoffice-3-3-1'. It is not based
on a tag yet, Petr will tag tomorrow.
The following rules apply:
+ any commit has to be reviewed by 3 people
+ preferably commit on
On Monday 07 February 2011 20:50:12 Nigel Hawkins wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-02-07 at 15:30 +, Michael Meeks wrote:
> > Perhaps you can build your patch on top of Andrey's to capture that
> > goodness ?
>
> OK. Attached.
>
So that would be the next step? Should I squash the two patches and resubmi
From c70749b0ae94c606f87398b36f7a8a4aa4ae9fb1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Christoph Herzog
Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2011 21:20:16 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Corrected typo in names of four swriter classes
Checked for the misspelled names via ./g grep, built master before and
after the changes and no err
Petr Mladek píše v Po 07. 02. 2011 v 21:14 +0100:
> It seems that it finally unwinded all the cycles => pushed.
Added [PUSHED] :-)
K.
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoff
I am having an issue with my extension Borderliner written in Java. It
works fine with Oracle OOo, but does not with Go-OO and LO.
It generates the bug IllegalArgumentException:
>> com.sun.star.lang.IllegalArgumentException:
>> at com.sun.star.bridges.jni_uno.JNI_proxy.dispatch_call(Native
Method
Jan Holesovsky píše v Po 07. 02. 2011 v 20:17 +0100:
> Hi Petr,
>
> Jan Holesovsky píše v St 02. 02. 2011 v 09:36 +0100:
>
> > Can you please review the patch in the following bug, and push to
> > libreoffice-3-3?
> >
> > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33258
> >
> > It fixes a 3.3
Hi Petr,
Jan Holesovsky píše v St 02. 02. 2011 v 09:36 +0100:
> Can you please review the patch in the following bug, and push to
> libreoffice-3-3?
>
> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33258
>
> It fixes a 3.3.1 blocker.
And the attached patch fixes the problem this patch introduc
My builds are now crashing in the same way in a few modules; pyuno is one of
them.
Making:libpyuno.so
: ERROR: Shared object "libpython2.6.so.1.0" not found, required by
"check_libpyuno.so"
dmake: Error code 1, while making '../../unxdflyx3.pro/lib/libpyuno.so'
Forcing regeneration of depend
Hi,
I'm 3 commits ahead at home. But I have only the license to push the
middle one on my own. How can I do that?!?
The opening of FOSDEM was available from the webpage (and I thought it
must have been fun to be there). What about the other talks?
Christina Rossmanith
__
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 11:10 AM, Miklos Vajna wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 09:38:14AM -0600, Norbert Thiebaud
> wrote:
>> How about having a after-push git-hook in the master branch in our
>> git.fdi/git/libreoffice/* git repos that generate the list of
>> HEAD-sha1
>> that was you should be
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 10:29 AM, Michael Meeks wrote:
>
> On Sun, 2011-02-06 at 05:44 -0600, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
>> Note that the main drawback of our current approach is indeed the
>> bisection problem. It would be certainly be convinient to be able to
>> bisect on the entire set of repos...
On Mon, 2011-02-07 at 15:30 +, Michael Meeks wrote:
> Perhaps you can build your patch on top of Andrey's to capture that
> goodness ?
OK. Attached.
> I'm busy adding a few more easy hacks to try to make such
> conflicts less likely: it can help to add your name and a date vs. an
> easy hack
At 6:49am -0500 Mon, 07 Feb 2011, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
Kevin Hunter wrote:
After about 20 minutes of Googling, and random grepping through the
code base, I'm having no luck. Does such a beast exist?
At least I'm not aware of any - thing is, higher-level functionality
in LibO currently ~alw
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 12:12 AM, Miklos Vajna wrote:
> Though we have a related page:
>
> http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/LibreOffice/FindTheExpert
I couldn't find Michael Meeks on the list.
--
Best Regards,
Nguyen Hung Vu [aka: NVH] ( in Vietnamese: Nguyễn Vũ Hưng )
vuhung16plus{remov
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 12:17 AM, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
>> Though we have a related page:
http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/LibreOffice/FindTheExpert
Thank you, it is extremely useful when I go to IRC as well.
>
> That page is to help those doing bug triage, I think?
> I don't think we want
> Though we have a related page:
That page is to help those doing bug triage, I think? I don't think we want to
start getting personally addressed mail asking for enhancements, surely? The
norm in Open Source is to keep discussion in the open, on publicly archived
mailing lists.
--tml
__
On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 08:53:57AM -0700, Tor Lillqvist
wrote:
> > so that I can pin-point a question to the right persons :)
>
> Don't. Just send questions to this list.
Though we have a related page:
http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/LibreOffice/FindTheExpert
Should we get rid of tha
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 10:53 PM, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
>> so that I can pin-point a question to the right persons :)
>
> Don't. Just send questions to this list.
The situation is that I got a bug report or a feature adding wish from
somewhere other than this mailing.
I want to write an email to th
On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 09:38:14AM -0600, Norbert Thiebaud
wrote:
> How about having a after-push git-hook in the master branch in our
> git.fdi/git/libreoffice/* git repos that generate the list of
> HEAD-sha1
> that was you should be able to almost-completely bisect.
> sure in some cases the fa
On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 04:29:23PM +, Michael Meeks
wrote:
> Could we do some sort of date based bisection ? or does that not work
> because the patches are not in chronological order really ;-)
It's possible to do g checkout "@{2011-02-07}", but then we have to
reinvent our own git-bi
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 12:18 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>> So, to make things simple, let's force user having GNU tar, not BSD tar.
> Seriously why not supporting bsdtar?
OK,
I think BSD tar is as good as GNU tar :)
Let's close the topic here so that RMS won't jump into LibO cough-cough :)
-
On Sun, 2011-02-06 at 05:44 -0600, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
> Note that the main drawback of our current approach is indeed the
> bisection problem. It would be certainly be convinient to be able to
> bisect on the entire set of repos... but how much pain/risk do we want
> to take to improve that a
On Mon, 2011-02-07 at 17:05 +0700, Samphan Raruenrom wrote:
> FYI: We simply rename soffice.bin to soffice.bin.exe and open in it
> Visual C++. Then add those path you mentioned in Project Properties.
Sounds like we need to add this to some "how to debug LibreOffice" wiki
page :-) [ neat
On Mon, 2011-02-07 at 13:12 +0100, Andre Schnabel wrote:
> > Von: Martin Srebotnjak
..
> > just thinking loud (hope it is not too loud): is it possible to* make
> > help packs into extensions* (oxt files)?
Sounds (to me) like a really good idea :-) May not work well for Linux
- where y
> so that I can pin-point a question to the right persons :)
Don't. Just send questions to this list.
--tml
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Hello,
I'd want to know who is the person in charge with modules of LibO
so that I can pin-point a question to the right persons :)
cf. http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Architecture
--
Best Regards,
Nguyen Hung Vu [aka: NVH] ( in Vietnamese: Nguyễn Vũ Hưng )
vuhung16plus{remove}@gmail.d
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 9:02 AM, Miklos Vajna wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 06, 2011 at 05:44:03AM -0600, Norbert Thiebaud
> wrote:
>> humm... what build.git ? :-) on master I do not even clone build.git
>> anymore...
>
> Then bootstrap.git, you get it. :)
;-)
>
>
> (I mean tinbuild would push the cont
Hi Nigel,
On Mon, 2011-02-07 at 14:33 +, Nigel Hawkins wrote:
> Oddly enough, I was looking at this the other day but didn't get round
> to submitting a patch because I couldn't get sw to compile (for totally
> unrelated reasons). My changes were almost identical to yours, though I
> have one
On Sun, Feb 06, 2011 at 05:44:03AM -0600, Norbert Thiebaud
wrote:
> humm... what build.git ? :-) on master I do not even clone build.git
> anymore...
Then bootstrap.git, you get it. :)
> Con: it seriously increase the barrier of entry. git already scare
> some people... git + submodule at that
Hi Andrey,
> This is my first patch to LibreOffice so I'd be grateful for feedback on any
> issues.
Oddly enough, I was looking at this the other day but didn't get round
to submitting a patch because I couldn't get sw to compile (for totally
unrelated reasons). My changes were almost identical
On Mon, 2011-02-07 at 14:48 +0100, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
> drew wrote:
> > http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/API
> >
> > This is not an API - it seems to fit the definition I was taught?
> >
> Yes, this is an api - but please see Kevin's question, which was
> very specific.
Yup - should
drew wrote:
> http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/API
>
> This is not an API - it seems to fit the definition I was taught?
>
Yes, this is an api - but please see Kevin's question, which was
very specific.
Cheers,
-- Thorsten
pgpiqDCH6MH2A.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_
Small part of one of tasks in "easy tasks" list.
This is my first patch to LibreOffice so I'd be grateful for feedback on any
issues.
Released under LGPLv3+/MPL
---
sw/inc/undobj.hxx |4 ++--
sw/source/core/undo/unnum.cxx | 16 ++--
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+
Hi OP and Kohei-san,
FYI, consider this as a nasty hack or a bug?
-- Forwarded message --
From: OBUTEX/Hladůvka
Date: 2011/2/7
Subject: [tdf-discuss] Problem with linking external sheets in CALC
To: disc...@documentfoundation.org
I have linked to file1.ods another file2.xls sh
On Mon, 2011-02-07 at 12:49 +0100, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
> Kevin Hunter wrote:
> > After about 20 minutes of Googling, and random grepping through the
> > code base, I'm having no luck. Does such a beast exist?
> >
> At least I'm not aware of any - thing is, higher-level functionality
> in LibO
Yep - though I don't really like the installer concept on mac, I
guess I'd then prefer to install all those langs unconditionally. If
that turns out to cause issues, we can discuss other options.
Thorsten I have seen on mac some installers that allow you to specify
which drive to install on. Qu
Hi,
> Von: Martin Srebotnjak
> An: l...@libreoffice.org
> just thinking loud (hope it is not too loud): is it possible to* make
> help packs into extensions* (oxt files)?
I tried this briefly for one of the LibO beta versions. In theory
the mechanism is there but in reality I ended up with a
Kevin Hunter wrote:
> After about 20 minutes of Googling, and random grepping through the
> code base, I'm having no luck. Does such a beast exist?
>
At least I'm not aware of any - thing is, higher-level functionality
in LibO currently ~always assumes a running installation, mainloop,
uno etc. -
Note that we don't want the situation were all UI languages are equal, but one
UI language is more equal than the others.
--tml
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Hi,
just thinking loud (hope it is not too loud): is it possible to* make help
packs into extensions* (oxt files)? Could this also be done with the
lang-packs?
The benefits:
- *smaller file size*: extensions are great, because they are not
executables and all the execution/installation code alread
Michael Meeks wrote:
> Would it not be better in 3.4 (when we have solved the size issues) to
> have a single download (like Windows) that includes all the languages,
> and have an optional help-pack ?
>
Yep - though I don't really like the installer concept on mac, I
guess I'd then prefer t
Hello people,
Since I fixed the toolbar menus on the fontwork toolbar, I saw that one
of them as pretty badly shaped. The spacing menu was writing the text of
the items over the controls that were supposed to be displayed on the
left of it.
Could anyone review this commit, sign it off and cherry-
Christian,
I agree completely with you and learn a lot from you detail explanation.
Next I'd need a bit of advice to fix the bug I've mentioned.
On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 1:40 AM, Christian Lohmaier <
lohmaier+libreoff...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 9:59 PM, Christian Lohmaier
FYI: We simply rename soffice.bin to soffice.bin.exe and open in it Visual
C++. Then add those path you mentioned in Project Properties.
Thanks.
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 4:56 PM, Tantai Tanakanok wrote:
> Thanks Tor,
>
> It's work.
>
> On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 3:33 PM, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
>
>> > I
Thanks Tor,
It's work.
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 3:33 PM, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
> > I success debug with Attach to process solution but I want to debug the
> code
> > that execute when LibO start.
>
> Ah. That is always hard for me because
>
> 1) I never remember which source file it is that actual
On Sat, Feb 05, 2011 at 11:32:18PM +0100, Wilhelm Pflüger wrote:
> Find attached changes to lib-gui/comphelper to get some tests working
> again.
> These patches are LGPLv3+/MPL.
>
> This is my first contribution in this project - so don't hesitate with
> critics if its not the common procedure.
Forgot to mark as PUSHED.
D.
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
On Sun, Feb 06, 2011 at 09:42:46PM +0100, Xisco Faulí wrote:
> -} section[SECTIONS];
> +} section[SECTIONS] = NULL;
This is false alarm. The struct has default constructor, so the elements
of the array are initialized properly.
> +delete [] level;
This is wrong, because Outli
On Sat, Feb 05, 2011 at 11:45:47PM +0100, Wilhelm Pflüger wrote:
> Attached please find some changes to make tests in ure/sal work.
>
> One test fails and breaks the build though - if this is unwanted you may
> revert the change to ure/sal/prj/build.lst. (This is not exactly what is
> intended by
Hi Tor
On 04/02/11 15:34, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
I would like to cherry-pick that to libreoffice-3-3. (Otherwise it can't be
built on Windows with a recent DirectX SDK.)
looks ok to me, I would say go for it
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@l
On Sat, Feb 05, 2011 at 05:20:29PM -0500, Antoine Proulx wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here's a patch who removes bogus comments. It's released under the
> LGPLv3+ / MPL.
>
> Antoine
>
Hi, Antoine,
bug references like #XX# point to private Sun bugtracker, therefore
they are of no value to us (as opposi
> I success debug with Attach to process solution but I want to debug the code
> that execute when LibO start.
Ah. That is always hard for me because
1) I never remember which source file it is that actually contains the "main"
program of soffice.bin. There are half a dozen or so files with pro
On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 02:10:13AM -0500, Arno Teigseth wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-02-07 at 07:44 +0100, David Tardon wrote:
> > ... exists yet, it just points to a nonexistent file. LibO sees the
> > (symlink) file, so it doesn't allow to import a template with the same
> > name, but it cannot open it
Thanks Tor,
I success debug with Attach to process solution but I want to debug the code
that execute when LibO start. Attach to process can only debug after LibO
already started. How can I debug the startup code in VCL?
How can I debug soffice.bin? Any environment variable that I need to set.
T
69 matches
Mail list logo
