On 02/07/11 01:37, David Tardon wrote: > On Sun, Feb 06, 2011 at 09:42:46PM +0100, Xisco Faulí wrote: >> - } section[SECTIONS]; >> + } section[SECTIONS] = NULL; > > This is false alarm. The struct has default constructor, so the elements > of the array are initialized properly. > >> + delete [] level; > > This is wrong, because OutlineNumbering deletes the passed level in its > destructor. > > D. > _______________________________________________ > LibreOffice mailing list > LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Hi David, Just a friendly reminder to file a bug with cppcheck's devs if you've found false positives or outright mistakes made by cppcheck. We want to help them help us. :) They have April 9th slated as the next cppcheck release date, so lets be sure to get all the LO-found fixes into their tree and keep false/misleading results out of http://libreoffice.boldandbusted.com/ . If you did this already, sweet! :) Cheers, Jesse Adelman Linux Systems Consultant, ilikelinux Consulting http://www.ilikelinux.com/ Bold and Busted LLC http://www.boldandbusted.com/ _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
