On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 10:29 AM, Michael Meeks <michael.me...@novell.com> wrote: > > On Sun, 2011-02-06 at 05:44 -0600, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: >> Note that the main drawback of our current approach is indeed the >> bisection problem. It would be certainly be convinient to be able to >> bisect on the entire set of repos... but how much pain/risk do we want >> to take to improve that aspect of things ? > > Could we do some sort of date based bisection ? or does that not work > because the patches are not in chronological order really ;-)
Even if we could rely on a date (which we can't), that would give you the starting point. the bisection after that is just a bisection of the commit between that point and HEAD (usually) the problem is that we have commit scattered across 20 git repos... so in order to truly bisect, we need an extra layer to 'serialized' all the commit from all the git repos, and then bisect that series of commit Norbert > > Hmm, > > Michael. > > -- > michael.me...@novell.com <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot > > > _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
