Re: [Libreoffice] LibreOffice and (La)Tex

> The only problem may be the ODF requirements > (if any) to use StarOffice syntax. Yes, this is problem. But can run temporary new and old realization in parallel? And work on to put (La)TeX in ODF. ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedes

Re: [Libreoffice] LibreOffice and (La)Tex

On 27/01/11 21:09, libreoffice-requ...@lists.freedesktop.org wrote: Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2011 02:52:24 +0300 From: Alexander Subject: [Libreoffice] LibreOffice and (La)Tex To:libreoffice@lists.freedesktop.org Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Hi, I want to suggest to add in LO

Re: [Libreoffice] Calc crash when save as xls

Thanks Nobert. Tantai On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 1:56 PM, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: > On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 9:39 PM, Tantai Tanakanok > wrote: > > I already get autogen.sh by copying from bootstrap. > > Thanks for all. > > the 3.3 branch does not support a bootstrap-build. it needs the > build-rep

Re: [Libreoffice] How do I update my download?

On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 9:56 PM, Ron House wrote: > Hi, sorry for a beginner's question, but I downloaded the libreoffice code > base from git about a month ago, and I want to update it to be the same as > the recently released version 3.3 without having to download it all again. > Can anyone help

Re: [Libreoffice] Installation instructions for source code release

On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 10:17 PM, David Dumaresq wrote: > Hi Francois, > > here's where I have gone to get started: > >        http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Native_Build > > You'll need to install git to get the source, so don't worry about manually > downloading files. Anyway, i

Re: [Libreoffice] Calc crash when save as xls

On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 9:39 PM, Tantai Tanakanok wrote: > I already get autogen.sh by copying from bootstrap. > Thanks for all. the 3.3 branch does not support a bootstrap-build. it needs the build-repos, where ./g used to live (as ./bin/g). i.e something more in the line of http://wiki.document

Re: [Libreoffice] compilation fail for branch feature/gnumake2.1

On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 4:48 PM, Julien Nabet wrote: > > To test this branch, I didn't switch the branch of my libo repository, i > created a new directory. > Then, I followed the native build page > (http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Native_Build), except I > added a -b parameter for

Re: [Libreoffice] How do I update my download?

Hi Ron, I think the command you want is git pull, which will merge changes from the master (?). I too am a beginner, so feel free to google more about git. And follow the build instructions here: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Native_Build Regards, Dave On 2011-01-27,

[Libreoffice] How do I update my download?

Hi, sorry for a beginner's question, but I downloaded the libreoffice code base from git about a month ago, and I want to update it to be the same as the recently released version 3.3 without having to download it all again. Can anyone help out? I think, but am not sure, that the version I have

Re: [Libreoffice] Installation instructions for source code release

Hi Francois, here's where I have gone to get started: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Native_Build You'll need to install git to get the source, so don't worry about manually downloading files. Anyway, it's all explained in the link, http://wiki.docume

[Libreoffice] Missing vcl resource. This indicates that files vital to localization are missing. You might have a corrupt installation.

Hi! I'm getting several build errors. This one is in starmath: >build build -- version: 275224 = Building module starmath = Entering /Users/dfdumaresq/git/libo/starmath/sdi Entering /Users/dfdumaresq/git/libo/starmath/inc Entering /Users/dfdumaresq/git/libo/starmath/sou

[Libreoffice] Reworking build.pl: What to do with the "--html" and "--interactive" parameters

Hi all I analyzed the build.pl script to get rid of the "--server" parameter. While looking through the code I discovered two other parameters "--html" and "--interactive". Both generate a html page that should show an updated progress of the build. When a

Re: [Libreoffice] Calc crash when save as xls

I already get autogen.sh by copying from bootstrap. Thanks for all. Regards Tantai On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 10:08 AM, Tantai Tanakanok wrote: > Hi Jonathan, > > There is not autogen.sh too. > > Regards > Tantai > > On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 5:47 PM, Jonathan Aquilina > wrote: > >> On 1/27/11 11:2

Re: [Libreoffice] Calc crash when save as xls

Hi Jonathan, There is not autogen.sh too. Regards Tantai On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 5:47 PM, Jonathan Aquilina wrote: > On 1/27/11 11:29 AM, Tantai Tanakanok wrote: > > Hi Kohei > > I create a branch work directory with your shell script. > http://kohei.us/2010/11/16/working-with-a-branch-using-

[Libreoffice] LibreOffice and (La)Tex

Hi, I want to suggest to add in LO support LaTeX as formulas generator. Instead or jointly of Math. Currently, LO inherited old non-wide used StarOffice syntax for formulas. It creates inconveniences: * For LaTex users. They have got used its syntax and power. * For M$O users. They have got u

[Libreoffice] Man page not included

Hi all, Back in December I converted the OO.o man page to LibreOffice. I just installed the latest stable build and typing 'man libreoffice' doesn't bring up something. What's the reason? Am I missing something? If I have time I'll also give unopkg's man page. Cheers, Philipp __

Re: [Libreoffice] compilation fail for branch feature/gnumake2.1

Le 27/01/2011 07:07, Norbert Thiebaud a écrit : On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 3:51 PM, Julien Nabet wrote: Hello, I made a make clean yesterday evening. I "git updated" even today followed with an autogen.sh and the compilation fails with this : build -- version: 275224 = Buildin

Re: [Libreoffice] [Patch] Accelerate Perl installer builder

On 2011-01-27 Michael Meeks wrote: > Incidentally, if changing the format of the scp2 files to make them > easier to parse is sensible, we should do that too - the files all come > from scp2/ (as you can see). > > Also wrt. semantic differences, you can see the setup_osl.ins that much

Re: [Libreoffice] Little problem in LibreOffice Calc

Hi! I suggest you to write this information in the bug tracker: it's the natural place to report LibreOffice problems and avoid they get lost. https://bugs.freedesktop.org/ And you can search if someone else as already reported this problem. On 27/01/2011 18:26, Łukasz Madurski wrote: I have

Re: [Libreoffice] [Patch] Accelerate Perl installer builder

On 2011-01-27 Christian Lohmaier wrote: > So my question is: Did you just skim over the installer to identify > the part that is slow, or did you profile it yourself? And how did you > measure the improvement? I added "-d:DProf" to the perl calls in ooinstall to profile it. I measured the improv

[Libreoffice] MacOs Build failure in: unit test #2 on library ../../unxmacxi.pro/lib/libswdoctest.dylib

-- - start unit test #2 on library ../../unxmacxi.pro/lib/libswdoctest.dylib -- /bin/sh: line 1: 85233 Bus error DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH=${DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH+${DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH}:}/Volumes/Raid0

Re: [Libreoffice] configure: WARNING: Your gcc is not -fvisibility=hidden safe. Disabling visibility

On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 8:19 AM, Caolán McNamara wrote: > On Wed, 2011-01-26 at 13:56 +, Caolán McNamara wrote: >> Actually I think that warning might be bogus. > > Digging back into gcc PR26905 I see they specifically don't regress test > for this bug on Darwin. Following that logic I've move

Re: [Libreoffice] Libreoffice-build-3.3.0.4 - scp2-user-config-ooo3.diff patch fails

Hi, Michael! On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 6:03 AM, Michael Meeks wrote: > ---snip---. > > > scp2-user-config-ooo3.diff: > >This patch is almost certainly obsolete. > > > Any hints on how to deal with this error? Thanks very much. > >Sure; hack patches/dev300/apply and remove mention of

Re: [Libreoffice] web based libre office

If i can also add to this discussion abut why i am pushing this way. The w3c is already adopting a standards for apps the mimic the way packing is done for Open Office and MS Office documents http://www.w3.org/TR/widgets/ This whole conversation comes out of the current mobile app stored debate h

Re: [Libreoffice] RC4 / Windows size analysis ...

> Wow - great work :-) I've just pushed this to dictionaries/source in >master, and compiled it there. Still need some tweaks to get >it called in >the various dictionaries/ makefiles I suppose - but it is a great start >thanks ! > > Licensing wise - I'd like to add the standard LGPLv3+

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] gtk toggle buttons (libs-gui)

Hi, Here is a patch to fix gtk toggle buttons, and it cleans up the code a little too. "togglebutton" detail is not standard, and caused some bugs with the Ambiance theme, see this bug: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33473 and this page to check the standard details name: https://we

[Libreoffice] Installation instructions for source code release

Hi! Now that LibreOffice 3.3.0.4 has been released, I'd like to have a go at building it from source. How does one install LibreOffice from the source tarballs ? Are there some instructions somewhere ? There are 21 different files such as "libreoffice-artwork-3.3.0.4.tar.bz2" Do they all need to

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] remove unused declaration - an unlikely fix for armel segfault in regcomp

On 01/27/2011 05:31 PM, Caolán McNamara wrote: > On Thu, 2011-01-27 at 15:42 +0200, Jani Monoses wrote: >> armel > > sal/osl/unx/interlck.c probably should have a specific impl for arm btw, > probably a low hanging fruit for someone who knows a little bit of arm > assembly. What about using GCC

Re: [Libreoffice] RC4 / Windows size analysis ...

Hi Steven, On Wed, 2011-01-26 at 15:17 +1000, Steven Butler wrote: > > > One idea, can we generate thesaurus idx file during install? That may > > > solve few megabytes. .. > I have had an attempt at this - code attached, it is dual licensed under > LGPL / MIT although there are no (c) headers in

Re: [Libreoffice] Patches by two persons?

Hi Soeren, On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 01:57:27PM +0100, Soeren Moeller wrote: > I have a question on, which approach LibO prefers for patches prepared > by two persons together, the reason being that I do most of my patches > working together with a friend in some "pair programming" like style. I

[Libreoffice] mrman...@gmail.com

*mrman...@gmail.com* ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: [Libreoffice] [Patch] Accelerate Perl installer builder

Hi Jan, *, On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 2:21 AM, Jan Darmochwal wrote: > > The attached patch makes make_installer.pl save up to 25% time on my > linux machine. Wow - impressive :-) So my question is: Did you just skim over the installer to identify the part that is slow, or did you profile it yours

Re: [Libreoffice] LibreOffice for OI or OSOL

Hi there, On Wed, 2011-01-26 at 00:24 -0800, komarek wrote: > Will ever LibreOffice available for operating system > OpenIndiana_x86 or OpenSolaris_x86? > Thank you for your reply. Good question; it is (I imagine) mostly a matter of finding someone to do the build and packaging of it. I a

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Parse 'color' property (fdo#33551)

Oops! I forgot to attach the patch. On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 12:52 AM, KUROSAWA, Takeshi wrote: > Hi, > > SVG import filter doesn't support 'color' property yet. > This makes svg files produced by gnuplot invisible. > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33551 > > The attached patch makes

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] Parse 'color' property (fdo#33551)

Hi, SVG import filter doesn't support 'color' property yet. This makes svg files produced by gnuplot invisible. https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33551 The attached patch makes the filter able to parse 'color' property and store the value as currentColor. Cheers, -- KUROSAWA, Takeshi

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] [UX] Rename "Default Formatting" --> "Clear Direct Formatting"

On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 04:30:15 -0800, Michael Meeks wrote: On Wed, 2011-01-26 at 00:08 +0100, Christoph Noack wrote: Oh, good to know - to be honest, I partly relied on the help system. And in a recent LibreOffice build, it still states "and formatting by character styles", see: Goo

[Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Translation of comments (minor, 6 files) in sw/inc

Hi Christoph, On Wed, 2011-01-26 at 10:44 +0100, Christoph Herzog wrote: > Subject: [PATCH] Translation of comments (minor, 6 files) in sw/inc > (LGPLv3+ / MPL) Another beautiful patch. Any chance you can file a bug to give you commit access following this: http://freedesktop.org

Re: [Libreoffice] Getting started with Java development for LO

Hi MIchael, Am 27.01.2011 15:50, schrieb Michael Meeks: 1) I understood on this mailing-lists archive that it is intended to have any Java portions replaced with something else to get rid of JRE dependencies. I guess that an optional Java-API for writing extensions to LO is not effected by thi

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] remove unused declaration - an unlikely fix for armel segfault in regcomp

On Thu, 2011-01-27 at 15:42 +0200, Jani Monoses wrote: > armel sal/osl/unx/interlck.c probably should have a specific impl for arm btw, probably a low hanging fruit for someone who knows a little bit of arm assembly. C. ___ LibreOffice mailing list Lib

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] Use product name for EPS Creator header

Hi, I've recently noticed the EPS export filter uses "Sun Microsystems, Inc." for %%Creator header. https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33569 Here is a patch to make the filter use product name for the header. It's actually copied from PDF export filter. Cheers, -- KUROSAWA, Takeshi Fr

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] remove unused declaration - an unlikely fix for armel segfault in regcomp

Hi Michael, thanks for pushing to 3.3 When there's a relase with the patch included, it should close this issue I opened a few days ago https://bugs.freedesktop.org//show_bug.cgi?id=33402 > > Having said that, it is already fixed in master, so I just merged your > patch to libreoffice-3-

Re: [Libreoffice] web based libre office

I just want to add that the idea of using Google Docs and the WedDav aspects is a good first step. Sure it allows seamless editing via the web and synchronisation back to your own harddisk OR cloud harddisk. But its a first step. I think that getting a XML to DOM component that is JavaScript based

Re: [Libreoffice] Getting started with Java development for LO

Hi Thorsten, On Thu, 2011-01-27 at 14:38 +0100, Thorsten Guenther wrote: > I tried to make myself familiar with the java portions of LO but got > stuck and confused. Can someone give me pointers on some topics? Sure ! :-) > 1) I understood on this mailing-lists archive that it is intend

Re: [Libreoffice] web based libre office

Hey all, Yeah i thought about Google Docs synchronisation. For example this is what i do now but a more manual process. It does work, but as you say you loose fidelity because google docs is not Open Office. I cant help but think that the purist way of rendering directly using html5 and JavaScrip

[Libreoffice] [PUSHED] remove unused declaration - an unlikely fix for armel segfault in regcomp

Hi Jani, On Thu, 2011-01-27 at 15:42 +0200, Jani Monoses wrote: > this declaration seems to not be used. Right :-) > A similar one exists in the file token.cxx in formula/ where this was > copied from according to the comments. Indeed. > This, in combination with some toolchain

Re: [Libreoffice] UNO api spelling fix ...

On Thu, 2011-01-27 at 13:53 +, Michael Meeks wrote: > On Thu, 2011-01-27 at 13:08 +0200, Aurimas Fišeras wrote: > > Is it possible at all to compile API documentation only using ure git tree? > > I really don't know; what tool do we use to build the docs ? "autodoc" C. _

Re: [Libreoffice] UNO api spelling fix ...

On Thu, 2011-01-27 at 13:08 +0200, Aurimas Fišeras wrote: > Is it possible at all to compile API documentation only using ure git tree? I really don't know; what tool do we use to build the docs ? ;-) sorry - one of my (many) areas of total ignorance. Thanks, Mic

[Libreoffice] Getting started with Java development for LO

Hi all, I tried to make myself familiar with the java portions of LO but got stuck and confused. Can someone give me pointers on some topics? 1) I understood on this mailing-lists archive that it is intended to have any Java portions replaced with something else to get rid of JRE dependencie

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] remove unused declaration - an unlikely fix for armel segfault in regcomp

Hello, this declaration seems to not be used. A similar one exists in the file token.cxx in formula/ where this was copied from according to the comments. This, in combination with some toolchain issue I guess caused regcomp crashing on Ubuntu armel at the install phase. >From what I gathered s

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Accept using a bin/java that is a symlink

On Thu, 2011-01-27 at 13:08 +0100, Miklos Vajna wrote: > On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 01:01:52PM +0100, Petr Mladek wrote: > > I would suggest to remove support for gcj at all. We have got many > > gcj-specific bugs that were pretty hard to fix in the past. I strongly > > suggest to use OpenJDK if you

Re: [Libreoffice] build error on lingucomponent

On Thu, 2011-01-27 at 13:54 +0700, Tantai Tanakanok wrote: > Hi all, > > > I have an error when build (master repo) on windows. Anyone have any > idea how to fix this. I don't see an error in that log, just some link-time warnings, are you talking about those ? C.

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] ww8: silence debug output with dbglevel=1

On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 01:04:00PM +0100, Miklos Vajna wrote: > Hi David, > > You recently had this dbglevel change. Here is a patch that brings the > ww8 codebase in sync with this: > > - #if OSL_DEBUG_LEVEL > 0 -> #if OSL_DEBUG_LEVEL > 1 > - OSL_TRACE() is already guarded with #if OSL_DEBUG_LEV

Re: [Libreoffice] LibreOffice and Wayland support

Hi Alex, On Mon, 2011-01-24 at 17:57 +0100, Alexander Thurgood wrote: > Are there any moves afoot to support Wayland, the potential replacement > for X on Linux ? None yet. Now, of course X apps will still sit on top of wayland, so there is not a huge urgency here. Also, IMHO the timeline

[Libreoffice] Patches by two persons?

Hi I have a question on, which approach LibO prefers for patches prepared by two persons together, the reason being that I do most of my patches working together with a friend in some "pair programming" like style. Until now we have committed the patches, by me committing them, but as it seems we

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] [UX] Rename "Default Formatting" --> "Clear Direct Formatting"

On Wed, 2011-01-26 at 00:08 +0100, Christoph Noack wrote: > Oh, good to know - to be honest, I partly relied on the help system. And > in a recent LibreOffice build, it still states "and formatting by > character styles", see: Good point. Octavio - any chance of an improvement to the help

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Accept using a bin/java that is a symlink

Hi, On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 01:01:52PM +0100, Petr Mladek wrote: > I would suggest to remove support for gcj at all. We have got many > gcj-specific bugs that were pretty hard to fix in the past. I strongly > suggest to use OpenJDK if you want a free JRE. NACK. There's architectures which do not

Re: [Libreoffice] web based libre office

On Thu, 2011-01-27 at 12:55 +0100, Charles-H. Schulz wrote: > Indeed, a first step would be an extension that could store documents > on Dropbox and Ubuntu One... what do others think? This probably belongs on the discuss list. Can we talk development: patches, code details, tangled bugs,

Re: [Libreoffice] Libreoffice-build-3.3.0.4 - scp2-user-config-ooo3.diff patch fails

On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 11:58:29PM -0500, John B wrote: > I downloaded the libreoffice-build-3.3.0.4 tarball and attempted to build LO > 3.3.0 from source. I passed the following options to the configure script: > --with-distro=Slackware and --without-git. Looks like the SlackwareOnly section was

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Accept using a bin/java that is a symlink

On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 01:01:52PM +0100, Petr Mladek wrote: > Thorsten Behrens píše v St 26. 01. 2011 v 16:20 +0100: > > Lionel Elie Mamane wrote: > > > I use Debian. A self-compiled libreoffice refuses to use my GNU Java > > > (gij), saying the directory does not contain a JRE. The Debian packag

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] ww8: silence debug output with dbglevel=1

Hi David, You recently had this dbglevel change. Here is a patch that brings the ww8 codebase in sync with this: - #if OSL_DEBUG_LEVEL > 0 -> #if OSL_DEBUG_LEVEL > 1 - OSL_TRACE() is already guarded with #if OSL_DEBUG_LEVEL > 1, so remove the ifdefs around it. OK to push? Thanks. From ac84757

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Accept using a bin/java that is a symlink

Thorsten Behrens píše v St 26. 01. 2011 v 16:20 +0100: > Lionel Elie Mamane wrote: > > I use Debian. A self-compiled libreoffice refuses to use my GNU Java > > (gij), saying the directory does not contain a JRE. The Debian package > > of libreoffice actually autodetects it and happily uses it, but

Re: [Libreoffice] web based libre office

Hi Samphan, On Thu, 2011-01-27 at 17:32 +0700, Samphan Raruenrom wrote: > Another idea for a shorter-term solution for this is Great - there is an existing google docs connector out there; it shouldn't be too hard to make this integration better; in particular by re-writing it to be nativ

Re: [Libreoffice] web based libre office

Hello there, Indeed, a first step would be an extension that could store documents on Dropbox and Ubuntu One... what do others think? best, Charles. Le Thu, 27 Jan 2011 17:32:48 +0700, Samphan Raruenrom a écrit : > Another idea for a shorter-term solution for this is, instead of > web-based L

Re: [Libreoffice] Minor Design fixes - Little hacks to improve the User Interface

On Wed, 2011-01-26 at 00:01 -0800, Crazy H Studio - Mike Houben wrote: > the User Interface hase a lot of little problems, where some things > are not in place. This could be an button not aligned, 2px to far on > the right. Find things where the developer didn't do the programming > right. Little

[Libreoffice] JRE1.5 compatibility

Hi, Some jar LibreOffice3.3 (Juhl, Jurt, ...) have been compiled with a JRE1.6, contrary to the same jar in OpenOffice3.3 remaining compatible with JRE1.5. Is it a choice or a compilation error? This issue is important for Java applications that drive Office, for their portability and OO / OL ... A

Re: [Libreoffice] UNO api spelling fix ...

2011.01.27 12:40, Michael Meeks rašė: > Hi Aurimas, > > I was chasing down a compilation problem in extensions, and I noticed > that somehow we changed the (incorrectly spelled) UNO enumeration value > 'Cancelled' to 'Canceled' (which is correct) as part of your huge, and > much appreciated

Re: [Libreoffice] UNO api spelling fix ...

On Thu, 2011-01-27 at 10:40 +, Michael Meeks wrote: > Hi Aurimas, > > I was chasing down a compilation problem in extensions, and I noticed > that somehow we changed the (incorrectly spelled) UNO enumeration value > 'Cancelled' to 'Canceled' (which is correct) FWIW, double-checking dic

Re: [Libreoffice] Libreoffice-build-3.3.0.4 - scp2-user-config-ooo3.diff patch fails

Hi John, On Wed, 2011-01-26 at 23:58 -0500, John B wrote: > I downloaded the libreoffice-build-3.3.0.4 tarball and attempted to > build LO 3.3.0 from source. I passed the following options to the > configure script: --with-distro=Slackware and --without-git. Ah - I suspect the Slackware

Re: [Libreoffice] [Patch] Accelerate Perl installer builder

Hi Jan, On Thu, 2011-01-27 at 02:21 +0100, Jan Darmochwal wrote: > I found this on the easy hacks page: > http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Easy_Hacks .. > The attached patch makes make_installer.pl save up to 25% time on my > linux machine. Brilliant work :-) Incide

Re: [Libreoffice] web based libre office

Hi Jonathan, On Thu, 2011-01-27 at 09:36 +0100, Jonathan Aquilina wrote: > > Either way - I don't think this discussion really > > belongs here - sorry. .. > I wouldn't mind spear heading an effort to do a python port > of LO in regards to going web based. Cant you integrate the > C++ code we

Re: [Libreoffice] Calc crash when save as xls

On 1/27/11 11:29 AM, Tantai Tanakanok wrote: Hi Kohei I create a branch work directory with your shell script. http://kohei.us/2010/11/16/working-with-a-branch-using-git-new-workdir/ I issue the command ./create-branch-build.sh ./libo/clone . libreoffice-3-3-0 After that I go into libreoffice-

[Libreoffice] UNO api spelling fix ...

Hi Aurimas, I was chasing down a compilation problem in extensions, and I noticed that somehow we changed the (incorrectly spelled) UNO enumeration value 'Cancelled' to 'Canceled' (which is correct) as part of your huge, and much appreciated cleanup of the API documentation there.

Re: [Libreoffice] web based libre office

Another idea for a shorter-term solution for this is, instead of web-based LibO, someone make a synchronization software that relay changes between off-line ODF and online Google Docs, a la Google Cloud Connect for MS Office. Working with Google Docs is somewhat painful because it still lacks many

Re: [Libreoffice] Calc crash when save as xls

Hi Kohei I create a branch work directory with your shell script. http://kohei.us/2010/11/16/working-with-a-branch-using-git-new-workdir/ I issue the command ./create-branch-build.sh ./libo/clone . libreoffice-3-3-0 Afte

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] cleanup on impress

Hi, Another cleanup on impress. Cheers, -- Takeshi Abe >From f0011014c94de1a9ee159cc96276dc88e3ece5b9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Takeshi Abe Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 17:29:41 +0900 Subject: [PATCH 1/2] removed dead codes and fixed a typo --- sd/source/core/PageListWatcher.cxx |1 -

Re: [Libreoffice] [REVIEW] Make CC/CXX configurable again (there's a gcc-4.0 incompat on mac)

Hi Thorsten, On Wed, 2011-01-26 at 16:55 +0100, Thorsten Behrens wrote: > this is for libreoffice-3-3 - I have a local fix in place to be able > to build in the first place, on OSX 10.6 with latest XCode. :-) > I cannot see a reason why to clobber CC/CXX, FWIW, in master, this > code is

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] removed some bogus comments

Hello Suguru, First, many thanks for your patch! On Thu, 2011-01-27 at 01:43 +0900, suguru hirahara wrote: > I made a patch file. Please notice me if there's any mistake. Well, you removed entirely some comments containing references to some public bug reports (they look like #i12345#). In this

Re: [Libreoffice] web based libre office

On 1/24/11 5:53 PM, Michael Meeks wrote: Hi Ged, So - thank you for your nice ideas :-) we can setup a list for this discussion: crack-smoking-re-write-everyhing-in-javascr...@tdf.org or somesuch ? :-) On Mon, 2011-01-24 at 17:17 +0100, Ged Wed wrote: well you gotta start sometime and

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Rename "Default Formatting" --> "Clear Direct Formatting"

Hello Octavio, Many thanks for those changes. I've pushed them in the master branch. Feel free to continue improving Writer like that :) On Fri, 2011-01-21 at 15:09 -0800, Octavio Alvarez wrote: > Hi. > > The purpose of the following set of patches is to rename "Default > Formatting" to "Clear D

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH][PUSHED] ure: Some fixes to documentation (part 2)

Hello Aurimas, I just pushed your patch to the master branch. Thank you so much for all those IDL references fixes :) Feel free to continue providing patches like this one! On Tue, 2011-01-25 at 20:27 +0200, Aurimas Fišeras wrote: > Affected folders: > offapi/com/sun/star/form - offapi/com/sun/st