On Thu, 2011-01-27 at 13:08 +0100, Miklos Vajna wrote: > On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 01:01:52PM +0100, Petr Mladek <pmla...@suse.cz> wrote: > > I would suggest to remove support for gcj at all. We have got many > > gcj-specific bugs that were pretty hard to fix in the past. I strongly > > suggest to use OpenJDK if you want a free JRE. > > +1, I got a lot of random build failure before we switched to OpenJDK.
Eek, -1. It typically builds fine with gcj for us here. Granted theres a quick or two at run-time (two bug with patches submitted to our gcc/gcj guys) with some swing using extensions (The google doc extension is afflicted by this). > (--enable-gcjaot, etc.) should be updated as well. I think we could/should get rid of that aot stuff, we probably don't need to support that anymore, it was a desperate hack back in the day to try and cut a few hours out of the helpcontent building thing before we converted the java bit to c++, though some java stuff got stuck back up on it afterwards again. C. _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
