[Libreoffice] [PATCH] Refreshing some OxygenOffice related patches

2010-12-29 Thread Kálmán „KAMI” Szalai
Hi All, I attaching two patch that: * refreshing some OxygenOffice related patches * disable few OxygenOffice only patches from apply file Please review it and apply. Best regards, KAMI From 89bdf591bfb4298499bbe37f606e8a53bf845654 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Kalman Szalai - KAMI Date: Thu,

Re: [Libreoffice] Annoying cursor behavior on sw tables

2010-12-29 Thread Octavio Alvarez
On Wed, 29 Dec 2010 05:37:31 -0800, Jan Holesovsky wrote: On 2010-12-23 at 21:07 -0800, Octavio Alvarez wrote: There is this really annoying behavior: 0. Open Writer. 1. Create a table, say 3 x 3. 2. Place the cursor in a cell. 3. Type some text, like asdfasdfasdfasdf. 4. Using the mouse, plac

Re: [Libreoffice] Request for review: bug 32427

2010-12-29 Thread Jan Holesovsky
Hi Norbert, all, On 2010-12-21 at 10:18 +0100, Jan Holesovsky wrote: > Good point - actually, the easiest / best might be to enclose the entire > call into '(' and ')', and add '&' to that? Ie. it'd result into > '( firefox something ) &'. Any objections? Updated patch attached to https://bug

Re: [Libreoffice] online registration menu element -> 404

2010-12-29 Thread Jan Holesovsky
Hi Bernhard, On 2010-12-30 at 02:16 +0100, Bernhard Dippold wrote: > But there already has been a thread on the marketing list (IIRC) asking > for an improved user feedback in future - probably quite helpful for > marketing and UX. If such a feature can be based on the present code, I > don't

Re: [Libreoffice] online registration menu element -> 404

2010-12-29 Thread Bernhard Dippold
Hi Kendy, all Jan Holesovsky schrieb: [...] But how exactly do you mean it with enabling the online registration menu - by an user action, or during the build? I'd say the best thing would be to get rid of that completely, and remove all the related code... I don't know how much code will hav

Re: [Libreoffice] De-Java-ise flat XML export

2010-12-29 Thread Jan Holesovsky
Hi Peter, On 2010-12-29 at 14:29 +0100, Peter Jentsch wrote: > I've gotten so far as to have a working implementation of XSLTFilter > which uses libxml2/libxslt to do the XSL transformation. It's still > missing some details like passing parameters to the xslt script, but it > works for the flat

Re: [Libreoffice] Allow Admins to Hide "Enable experimental features"

2010-12-29 Thread Olivier Hallot
Bug 31928, already open. Em 29-12-2010 22:13, Olivier Hallot escreveu: Hello friends *If* this has not yet been done, I have a request make the "Enable experimental (unstable) features" hideable from the UI, possibly thru an XCU configuration file. I can open a bug for the records, just let me

Re: [Libreoffice] Formula cursor : bug or feature ?

2010-12-29 Thread Jan Holesovsky
Hi Regina, On 2010-12-30 at 01:14 +0100, Regina Henschel wrote: > > For me the current formula editor is already easy-to-use. However it > > will be more easy to use if the command window was able to show the > > complementary braket or brace. It would be very useful when you have > > complex for

Re: [Libreoffice] Formula cursor : bug or feature ?

2010-12-29 Thread Jean-Baptiste Faure
Hi, Le 30/12/2010 01:14, Regina Henschel a écrit : > Hi, > > Jean-Baptiste Faure schrieb: >> Hi, >> >> Le 29/12/2010 23:59, Jonas Finnemann Jensen a écrit : If you need to remove cursor formula feature to implement your visual editor, that proves there is some defect in your implementati

Re: [Libreoffice] Formula cursor : bug or feature ?

2010-12-29 Thread Jan Holesovsky
Hi Jonas, On 2010-12-29 at 20:06 +0100, Jonas Finnemann Jensen wrote: > > One feature is already lost. I fear more regressions. > If you disable experimental features, everything is back to normal. > And position and selection synchronization "can" be fixed before this > feature is enabled by def

Re: [Libreoffice] Formula cursor : bug or feature ?

2010-12-29 Thread Regina Henschel
Hi, Jean-Baptiste Faure schrieb: Hi, Le 29/12/2010 23:59, Jonas Finnemann Jensen a écrit : If you need to remove cursor formula feature to implement your visual editor, that proves there is some defect in your implementation. Please, do not tell we do not need this feature when you do not know

[Libreoffice] Allow Admins to Hide "Enable experimental features"

2010-12-29 Thread Olivier Hallot
Hello friends *If* this has not yet been done, I have a request make the "Enable experimental (unstable) features" hideable from the UI, possibly thru an XCU configuration file. I can open a bug for the records, just let me know. Motivation: In large deployments with tight IT control such opt

[Libreoffice] LO Pootle

2010-12-29 Thread Jan Holesovsky
Hi Sophie, Thank you for all the explanations! :-) On 2010-12-29 at 21:00 +0300, Sophie Gautier wrote: > This is now two/three months that we didn't touch the files because we > do not have them in the LO Pootle repository and we are not working any > more on the OOo Pootle repository. So some

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] new cppcheck cleaning in svx

2010-12-29 Thread Julien Nabet
Hello, Here are 2 new patches for cppcheck cleaning in svx Compiling was ok Remarks : I had this with the last "git version" of cppcheck : 1) [./svdotxln.cxx:67]: (style) The class 'ImpSdrObjTextLink' does not have a constructor. but we can read this on the file : class ImpSdrObjTextLink: publ

Re: [Libreoffice] Formula cursor : bug or feature ?

2010-12-29 Thread Jean-Baptiste Faure
Hi, Le 29/12/2010 23:59, Jonas Finnemann Jensen a écrit : >> If you need to remove cursor formula feature to implement your visual >> editor, that proves there is some defect in your implementation. >> Please, do not tell we do not need this feature when you do not know how >> to implement your vi

Re: [Libreoffice] Formula cursor : bug or feature ?

2010-12-29 Thread Jonas Finnemann Jensen
> If you need to remove cursor formula feature to implement your visual > editor, that proves there is some defect in your implementation. > Please, do not tell we do not need this feature when you do not know how > to implement your visual editor without destroying it. As I said position and selec

Re: [Libreoffice] starmath / cppunit breakage in master

2010-12-29 Thread Miklos Vajna
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 09:28:56PM +, Caolán McNamara wrote: > If you change "std::" in that little section to "ext_std::" i.e. the > attached, does that work ? Yes. :) > If it does, go ahead and commit and push this, if it doesn't then go > ahead an push your own fix instead. Pushed your

Re: [Libreoffice] starmath / cppunit breakage in master

2010-12-29 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Sat, 2010-12-25 at 13:43 +0100, Miklos Vajna wrote: > On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 01:41:56PM +, Caolán McNamara > wrote: > > Try now again, there was one cppunit header included outside those > > guard. I've moved it inside the guards now. Does that now work ? > > No, I get the same output. H

Re: [Libreoffice] Formula cursor : bug or feature ?

2010-12-29 Thread Jean-Baptiste Faure
Le 29/12/2010 20:06, Jonas Finnemann Jensen a écrit : > [...] > If you disable experimental features, everything is back to normal. > And position and selection synchronization "can" be fixed before this > feature is enabled by default... > Assuming someone cares to implement it... and you're are w

Re: [Libreoffice] Formula cursor : bug or feature ?

2010-12-29 Thread Wols Lists
On 29/12/10 19:06, Jonas Finnemann Jensen wrote: > Hi Regina, > >> > It is only difficult for people, who do not get a starting instruction. > True... I would assume that most users are not given an introduction course... > In most schools students are given an introduction to MS Word and MathType.

Re: [Libreoffice] Formula cursor : bug or feature ?

2010-12-29 Thread Jonas Finnemann Jensen
Hi Regina, > It is only difficult for people, who do not get a starting instruction. True... I would assume that most users are not given an introduction course... In most schools students are given an introduction to MS Word and MathType. If an introduction is given, it's quite often assume that

Re: [Libreoffice] Formula cursor : bug or feature ?

2010-12-29 Thread Regina Henschel
Hi, Jonas Finnemann Jensen schrieb: Hi, Well, how say that kindly ? ;-) : For me the main advantage of Math module is that it is *not* like MathType. I agree that for some people, power users, the command text interface might be faster to use... But it's next to impossible to convince normal

Re: [Libreoffice] Request for review & push to libreoffice-3-3

2010-12-29 Thread Wols Lists
On 29/12/10 17:46, Rene Engelhard wrote: > English is de facto a thing everyone should know, even more so if > they are going to read the license. (And I would even > argue the preamble of the license belongs to the license itself, > and thus shouldn't be translated anyways). Actually, as a nativ

Re: [Libreoffice] [libreoffice-l10n] Re: Update of the localization files

2010-12-29 Thread Sophie Gautier
Hi Kendy, On 29/12/2010 20:31, Jan Holesovsky wrote: Hi Sophie, On 2010-12-29 at 19:52 +0300, Sophie Gautier wrote: This is why I ask: do we merge Libo with the last dev versions or do we work on the last SDF file only (I think it's OOo330m9) because it is now two completely separated products

Re: [Libreoffice] [libreoffice-l10n] Re: Update of the localization files

2010-12-29 Thread Sophie Gautier
On 29/12/2010 20:25, Jan Holesovsky wrote: Hi Sophie, On 2010-12-29 at 19:52 +0300, Sophie Gautier wrote: But we need to merge the strings quiet soon now because we didn't have the opportunity any more to fix l10n issues in OOo 3.3 since I am confused - did you mean 3.4 here, or I did not un

Re: [Libreoffice] Request for review & push to libreoffice-3-3

2010-12-29 Thread Rene Engelhard
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 07:22:07PM +0300, Sophie Gautier wrote: > This is great thanks ! I really hope that one day all our dialogs > will be able to magically adapt to our strings, that will save > everybody's time. Well, I know it's not easy any way. And I hope some f* day a day will come when i

Re: [Libreoffice] [libreoffice-l10n] Re: Update of the localization files

2010-12-29 Thread Jan Holesovsky
Hi Sophie, On 2010-12-29 at 19:52 +0300, Sophie Gautier wrote: > >> This is why I ask: do we merge Libo with the last dev versions or do we > >> work on the last SDF file only (I think it's OOo330m9) because it is now > >> two completely separated products? > > > > We are still working towards a

Re: [Libreoffice] [libreoffice-l10n] Re: Update of the localization files

2010-12-29 Thread Jan Holesovsky
Hi Sophie, On 2010-12-29 at 19:52 +0300, Sophie Gautier wrote: > But we need to merge the strings quiet soon now because we didn't have > the opportunity any more to fix l10n issues in OOo 3.3 since I am confused - did you mean 3.4 here, or I did not understand your initial mail, please? Thank

Re: [Libreoffice] making binfilter aka StarOffice FileFormat read-only

2010-12-29 Thread Jan Holesovsky
Hi Pierre-Andre, On 2010-12-27 at 21:31 +0100, Pierre-André Jacquod wrote: > An easy (and clean) possibility would be to change the filters defined > in binfilter as read-only filters (using as filter flag > SFX_FILTER_OPENREADONLY defined as 0x0001L) This will make the > opening read-only. B

Re: [Libreoffice] Formula cursor : bug or feature ?

2010-12-29 Thread Jonas Finnemann Jensen
Hi, > Well, how say that kindly ? ;-) : > For me the main advantage of Math module is that it is *not* like > MathType. I agree that for some people, power users, the command text interface might be faster to use... But it's next to impossible to convince normal users to sit down and learn a comma

Re: [Libreoffice] [libreoffice-l10n] Re: Update of the localization files

2010-12-29 Thread Martin Srebotnjak
Hi, I keep localizing OOo on my computer, with regular updates, knowing or hoping that at this stage most of changes for OOo 3.4 will make it to LO 3.4. Later, when all files are merged (OOo sdf + lo-build) into a LO set of po files, I can center on localizing those only. Lp, m. 2010/12/29 Sophi

Re: [Libreoffice] [libreoffice-l10n] Re: Update of the localization files

2010-12-29 Thread Sophie Gautier
Hi Kendy, On 29/12/2010 19:21, Jan Holesovsky wrote: Hi Sophie, On 2010-12-28 at 14:30 +0300, Sophie Gautier wrote: It may be quite hard to make difference between a *new* (m90) translated string and an old one. This is why I ask: do we merge Libo with the last dev versions or do we work on

Re: [Libreoffice] Annoying cursor behavior on sw tables

2010-12-29 Thread Octavio Alvarez
On Wed, 29 Dec 2010 06:57:27 -0800, Cesare Leonardi wrote: Sorry for breaking the thread, i was not subscribed to the list when this message was posted. Octavio Alvarez wrote: There is this really annoying behavior: 0. Open Writer. 1. Create a table, say 3 x 3. 2. Place the cursor in a cell

Re: [Libreoffice] Request for review & push to libreoffice-3-3

2010-12-29 Thread Sophie Gautier
On 29/12/2010 19:08, Jan Holesovsky wrote: Hi Sophie, On 2010-12-29 at 08:25 +0300, Sophie Gautier wrote: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32563 Thank you very much for that :) :-) I've a small request concerning the button, could you make sure that it's large enough for long

Re: [Libreoffice] [libreoffice-l10n] Re: Update of the localization files

2010-12-29 Thread Jan Holesovsky
Hi Sophie, On 2010-12-28 at 14:30 +0300, Sophie Gautier wrote: > > It may be quite hard to make difference between a *new* (m90) translated > > string and an old one. > > This is why I ask: do we merge Libo with the last dev versions or do we > work on the last SDF file only (I think it's OOo33

Re: [Libreoffice] Formula cursor : bug or feature ?

2010-12-29 Thread Jean-Baptiste Faure
Le 29/12/2010 16:20, Jonas Finnemann Jensen a écrit : > Hi, > > If you have enabled visual formula editing (The "Enable experimental > (unstable) features" checkbox). > Then the cursor should act more like MathType etc... e.g. like a > WYSIWYG editor... > It's demonstrated here: http://www.youtube

Re: [Libreoffice] Request for review & push to libreoffice-3-3

2010-12-29 Thread Jan Holesovsky
Hi Sophie, On 2010-12-29 at 08:25 +0300, Sophie Gautier wrote: > > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32563 > > Thank you very much for that :) :-) > I've a small request concerning the button, could you make sure that > it's large enough for long languages. For example, I'll need 1

Re: [Libreoffice] Formula cursor : bug or feature ?

2010-12-29 Thread Jonas Finnemann Jensen
Hi, If you have enabled visual formula editing (The "Enable experimental (unstable) features" checkbox). Then the cursor should act more like MathType etc... e.g. like a WYSIWYG editor... It's demonstrated here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3foNqKYAlYY If the formula is flickering when you mov

Re: [Libreoffice] Annoying cursor behavior on sw tables

2010-12-29 Thread Cesare Leonardi
Sorry for breaking the thread, i was not subscribed to the list when this message was posted. Octavio Alvarez wrote: There is this really annoying behavior: 0. Open Writer. 1. Create a table, say 3 x 3. 2. Place the cursor in a cell. 3. Type some text, like asdfasdfasdfasdf. 4. Using the mouse,

Re: [Libreoffice] Request for review & push to libreoffice-3-3

2010-12-29 Thread Jan Holesovsky
Hi Andras, On 2010-12-29 at 09:59 +0100, Andras Timar wrote: > The first word (This) has an unnecessary access key on it. I'll change it to %OOOPRODUCTNAME, or what exactly is the name of the variable to avoid confusion, that will be best I think. > It would be better to avoid manual line brea

Re: [Libreoffice] How to Update the Downloaded Source?

2010-12-29 Thread Jan Holesovsky
Hi Octavio, On 2010-12-24 at 20:45 -0800, Octavio Alvarez wrote: > > But how can I update the downloaded source? Do I need to download > > all the 4.4GB source whenever I want to update it? > > ./g pull Just a small note, to streamline the history, we should be using "./g pull -r" in most

Re: [Libreoffice] online registration menu element -> 404

2010-12-29 Thread Jan Holesovsky
Hi Kami, On 2010-12-24 at 23:54 +0100, Kálmán „KAMI” Szalai wrote: > If someone enables online registration menu element, and click on it > gets a pege with 404 error. The address is: > http://survey.libreoffice.org/user/index.php > please put a redirector here, or we should change the link in Li

Re: [Libreoffice] Test script patch review request (1)

2010-12-29 Thread Jan Holesovsky
Hi Yifan, On 2010-12-24 at 17:23 +0800, Yifan Jiang wrote: > Here is a bigger one, I forgot to compress it before, sorry to separate them. > > * 0002-replace-all-tabs-with-4-spaces.patch But did not push this one, sorry for that. This would cause trouble when merging changes from OOo, unfortun

[Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Re: Test script patch review request(0)

2010-12-29 Thread Jan Holesovsky
Hi Yifan, On 2010-12-24 at 17:20 +0800, Yifan Jiang wrote: > I've updated several test scripts and intended to make them more reliable. I > have tested them in SUSE Linux. Could you help review the patches and if > possible help run relevant cases in various platforms. Thank you all for > concern

Re: [Libreoffice] Annoying cursor behavior on sw tables

2010-12-29 Thread Jan Holesovsky
Hi Octavio, On 2010-12-23 at 21:07 -0800, Octavio Alvarez wrote: > There is this really annoying behavior: > 0. Open Writer. > 1. Create a table, say 3 x 3. > 2. Place the cursor in a cell. > 3. Type some text, like asdfasdfasdfasdf. > 4. Using the mouse, place the cursor in the middle of the asd

Re: [Libreoffice] De-Java-ise flat XML export

2010-12-29 Thread Peter Jentsch
Hi Gioele, I've gotten so far as to have a working implementation of XSLTFilter which uses libxml2/libxslt to do the XSL transformation. It's still missing some details like passing parameters to the xslt script, but it works for the flat xml export and for xhtml export as well. Using this implem

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Custom-intro-and-about-files-now-defaultly-png-files

2010-12-29 Thread Jan Holesovsky
Hi Kami, On 2010-12-24 at 03:33 +0100, Kálmán „KAMI” Szalai wrote: > Please review the attached files and integrate into libreoffice-3-3 > > Background: > Now png files are default as intro and about picture files. It seems > only intro.png and about.png used. These patches are: > * force tu spe

[Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Re: Request for review for 3.3

2010-12-29 Thread Jan Holesovsky
Hi Kohei, On 2010-12-23 at 12:41 -0500, Kohei Yoshida wrote: > I just fixed the following bug: > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32570 > > and would like to port the fix to 3.3. Here is the relevant commit > http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/calc/commit/?id=98764831e3b6c02d76

[Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Re: configure --without-git is broken, fetch_tarballs.sh is renamed to download

2010-12-29 Thread Jan Holesovsky
Hi Miklos, On 2010-12-27 at 14:06 +0100, Miklos Vajna wrote: > > > When I apply attached patch I can download external sources, since id > > > variable is libreoffice-3.3.0.2, not LIBREOFFICE_3_3_0_2: > > > > This is because RC2 is tagged as libreoffice-3.3.0.2, unlike RC1 which is > > tagged

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] [PUSHED] cppcheck cleaning in writer

2010-12-29 Thread David Tardon
___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] [PUSHED] cppcheck prefix operator in components

2010-12-29 Thread David Tardon
___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] [PUSHED] code cleanup and fix typos in comments

2010-12-29 Thread David Tardon
___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] [PUSHED] typo fix in helppacks.ulf

2010-12-29 Thread David Tardon
___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] [PUSHED] RTL_CONSTASCII_USTRINGPARAM in sw and toolkit

2010-12-29 Thread David Tardon
___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] [PUSHED] cppcheck cleaning in svx

2010-12-29 Thread David Tardon
___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: [Libreoffice] format inspector (Was : Re: sw: numbering misbehaviour)

2010-12-29 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 10:59 AM, Wols Lists wrote: > On 28/12/10 12:54, Philipp Weissenbacher wrote: > > But I didn't know about that OOo bug. I'll need to learn styles, but yes, >> *me* learning styles is totally useless when it's *someone* *else* who's >> messed up *their* document (and expects

Re: [Libreoffice] [Pushed] comments translated in writer\sw\source\core\edit\edfmt.cxx

2010-12-29 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
Thanks, Pascal. Pushed. one more thing: add [Patch] in the subject line of a post to this ML to indicated that a patch is attached (this help filter them out of the general discussion) Norbert On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 6:49 PM, TentleXS wrote: > Am 28.12.2010 22:14, schrieb Octavio Alvarez: >> >>

Re: [Libreoffice] [Pushed] comments translated in writer\sw\source\core\edit\edfmt.cxx

2010-12-29 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 5:25 AM, TentleXS wrote: > Am 27.12.2010 20:12, schrieb Octavio Alvarez: >> >> On Mon, 27 Dec 2010 10:49:19 -0800, TentleXS wrote: >> >>> Hallo @all, >>> my name is Pascal and I would like to contribute the following >>> translated code comments in "writer\sw\source\core\e

Re: [Libreoffice] Request for review & push to libreoffice-3-3

2010-12-29 Thread Andras Timar
2010/12/29 Jan Holesovsky > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32563 > > According to the l10n people, the lack of localized preamble in the > LICENSE.odt (accessible from the Help menu) is seen a blocker. For sure > we don't want to distribute n copies of the 132 pages long document,

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] cppcheck cleaning in svx

2010-12-29 Thread David Tardon
On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 10:22:19PM +0100, Julien Nabet wrote: > Hello, > > Here is a patch for cppcheck cleaning in svx > Compiling was ok > > (Sorry for the last message, i forgot to put the attachment). > > Julien > (LGPLv3+ / MPL) Pushed. D. ___ L

Re: [Libreoffice] comments translated in writer\sw\source\core\edit\edfmt.cxx

2010-12-29 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 5:25 AM, TentleXS wrote: > Am 27.12.2010 20:12, schrieb Octavio Alvarez: >> >> On Mon, 27 Dec 2010 10:49:19 -0800, TentleXS wrote: >> >>> Hallo @all, >>> my name is Pascal and I would like to contribute the following >>> translated code comments in "writer\sw\source\core\e

Re: [Libreoffice] comments translated in writer\sw\source\core\edit\edfmt.cxx

2010-12-29 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 12:49 PM, TentleXS wrote: > Hallo @all, > my name is Pascal and I would like to contribute the following > translated code comments in "writer\sw\source\core\edit\edfmt.cxx". My > native language is german so I hope it's OK that I did the translation. Hi Pascal, Welcome t