[Libreoffice] A file to show 8192 discontinuities crashes Calc

I often use a file to show that Calc doesn't have the 8192 discontinuities limit as in Excel (see http://smurfonspreadsheets.wordpress.com/2007/04/30/1-million-rows/). Until OOo 3.2.1 I can use my example file, with OOo 3.3RCx and now LibreOffice 3.3 Calc crashes. As I can't join my example file,

Re: [Libreoffice] [l10n]Pootle permission request

I'll forward this to the l10n list which I believe is the right list for this sort of request. Kohei On Thu, 2010-12-23 at 00:34 +, Seung Soo, Ha wrote: > Hello. > > I previously translated and uploaded a .po file for LO before, but found it > to > be too difficult for me and I did not fol

[Libreoffice] Request review for 3.3

Hi there, Just fixed the following bug on master https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32523 The fix was rather simple, as this commit shows http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/libs-gui/commit/?id=90c9dcfde572f227eae0760066af5b8a9d5d9218 However, not fixing this may cause some hard

[Libreoffice] [l10n]Pootle permission request

Hello. I previously translated and uploaded a .po file for LO before, but found it to be too difficult for me and I did not follow through. Recently I learned that LO had configured Pootle and I found it to be quite usable. To resume my contribution to LO , I request the necessary Pootle tran

Re: [Libreoffice] format inspector (Was : Re: sw: numbering misbehaviour)

On 23/12/10 00:07, Philipp Weissenbacher wrote: > May I point you to the crazy idea "Add WordPerfect features like > RevealCodes and HiddenText" [1] Actually, it was me that added that to the wiki page :-) > Also see the therein referenced OOo bug. It's been requested in 2002 > and always dismiss

Re: [Libreoffice] Better wording for 'Update links' question

On Wed, 22 Dec 2010 14:36:57 -0800, Cor Nouws wrote: And the contrary: - user has some data, that is known to be updated, - opens a file that uses the data and wants to update it immediately. Isn't that how the dialog is meant to be used? What is the point of the dialog, if he STILL has to cl

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Change of the color of the watermark at the pdfexport

Cor Nouws wrote: > The same applies of course for the default colors of Impress tables, > that were changed recently. This seems a different situation: you can change the color of a table if the default does not suit your needs, so if you want blue tables (default in OpenOffice.org) you can perfe

Re: [Libreoffice] format inspector (Was : Re: sw: numbering misbehaviour)

May I point you to the crazy idea "Add WordPerfect features like RevealCodes and HiddenText" [1] Also see the therein referenced OOo bug. It's been requested in 2002 and always dismissed with the answer "learn to use styles" *sigh*. Just my 2 cents. Philipp [1] http://wiki.documentfoundation.o

Re: [Libreoffice] format inspector (Was : Re: sw: numbering misbehaviour)

On 22/12/10 22:02, Cor Nouws wrote: > I do not so much believe in the old WP-style of 'reveal formatting' > since I know OOo. > As a style addict, and knowing where to find Ctrl-M, it's easy to > tackle most... > Said that, indeed a (new style) pop-up to show > - para style > - char. style > - d

Re: [Libreoffice] Better wording for 'Update links' question

Hi Kohei, hi Joe, all! Am Mittwoch, den 22.12.2010, 15:11 -0500 schrieb Kohei Yoshida: > On Wed, 2010-12-22 at 13:06 -0500, Joe Smith wrote: > > On 12/21/2010 12:09 PM, Jan Holesovsky wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32548 > > > > > > The bug says: when I o

Re: [Libreoffice] Better wording for 'Update links' question

Octavio Alvarez wrote (22-12-10 23:24) On Wed, 22 Dec 2010 12:11:29 -0800, Kohei Yoshida wrote: On Wed, 2010-12-22 at 13:06 -0500, Joe Smith wrote: Experts already know what "Update links?" means; non-experts will not understand enough to answer the question correctly even with improved wordin

Re: [Libreoffice] ixion breakage in sw

Henrik /KaarPoSoft píše v Út 16. 11. 2010 v 12:23 +0100: > Dear all, > > I am trying to build libreoffice 3.2.99.3 > > In sw/util when making libswli.so I get: > > ../unxlngi6.pro/slo/cellfml.o: In function `lcl_ConvertWWFormula(String > const&)': > cellfml.cxx:(.text+0x29c4): undefined referen

Re: [Libreoffice] Better wording for 'Update links' question

On Wed, 22 Dec 2010 12:11:29 -0800, Kohei Yoshida wrote: On Wed, 2010-12-22 at 13:06 -0500, Joe Smith wrote: Experts already know what "Update links?" means; non-experts will not understand enough to answer the question correctly even with improved wording. I disagree here. You tend to pola

[Libreoffice] format inspector (Was : Re: sw: numbering misbehaviour)

Caolán McNamara wrote (21-12-10 21:17) On Tue, 2010-12-21 at 19:59 +, Wols Lists wrote: Seeing as LO is based on XML as the document format it should be easy - all "reveal codes" is is a window with text and all the markup visible. The thing is that, while the file format is XML, the file

[Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Re: [Patch] RTL_CONSTASCII_USTRINGPARAM for some files part 3

On Wed, 2010-12-22 at 22:22 +0100, Julien Nabet wrote: > Hello, > > Here is a patch for some files. Looks good, committed locally and I'll push globally when my build completes just to double check this. > > there's still this : > writer/sw/inc/unomid.h:#define C2U(cChar) > rtl::OUString::crea

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Change of the color of the watermark at the pdfexport

Hi *, Andreas Mantke wrote (22-12-10 17:52) Am Dienstag, 21. Dezember 2010, 23:01:13 schrieb Andrea Pescetti: (...) Take this just as a comment and not criticism (I congratulate with Andreas too for his first patch!), but replacing a hard-coded value by another hard-coded value on the basis th

Re: [Libreoffice] Status of PDF export of docs containing EPS graphics

Le 22/12/2010 22:17, Caolán McNamara a écrit : > On Wed, 2010-12-22 at 21:42 +0100, Jean-Baptiste Faure wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Could someone clarify the status of the PDF export of docs containing >> EPS graphics. Is there some difference with OOo 3.3.0 regarding issue >> 14163 : http://www.openoffice

Re: [Libreoffice] Request for review

On Wed, 2010-12-22 at 20:55 +, Caolán McNamara wrote: > On Wed, 2010-12-22 at 12:39 -0500, Kohei Yoshida wrote: > > I feel confident that this change won't introduce any regressions. > > Could someone review this and give me a sign-off? > > Well, I think this is good anyway. Go for it I reckon

[Libreoffice] [Patch] RTL_CONSTASCII_USTRINGPARAM for some files part 3

Hello, Here is a patch for some files. (LGPLv3+ / MPL) Caolán: there's still this : writer/sw/inc/unomid.h:#define C2U(cChar) rtl::OUString::createFromAscii( cChar ) There a lot of files that use this macro. Could you give details about this part of your last message ? (how do you do this)

Re: [Libreoffice] [Patch] RTL_CONSTASCII_USTRINGPARAM for some files part2

On Wed, 2010-12-22 at 21:58 +0100, Julien Nabet wrote: > Hello, > > Here is a patch for some files Looks good. Pushed, thanks for this. C. ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/lib

Re: [Libreoffice] Status of PDF export of docs containing EPS graphics

On Wed, 2010-12-22 at 21:42 +0100, Jean-Baptiste Faure wrote: > Hi, > > Could someone clarify the status of the PDF export of docs containing > EPS graphics. Is there some difference with OOo 3.3.0 regarding issue > 14163 : http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=14163 ? The situation is

Re: [Libreoffice] Suggestion for Windows building

On Wed, 2010-12-22 at 20:57 +0100, Julien Nabet wrote: > 2) mesa headers not found. > I installed all the packages (bin and sources) except demo proposed by > cygwin. I searched on Google, nothing. > Then I added --without-system-mesa-headers This one, at least, is really a bug, which we've now

Re: [Libreoffice] [Easy Hacks] Creating OUString

On Wed, 2010-12-22 at 20:14 +0100, Guillaume Poussel wrote: > Hi all, > > I have had a look on the "Use RTL_CONSTASCII_USTRINGPARAM macro" task. > Lot of module have his own macro to transform an ASCII string to an > OUString : CREATE_OUSTRING, OUSTR, UNISTRING, C2U... > > It should be better to

[Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Re: [Patch] Remove bogus macro...

On Wed, 2010-12-22 at 19:02 +0100, Guillaume Poussel wrote: > Hi, > > You will find attached 2 patches to complete the easy task "Remove bogus > macro..". > > When you will be OK, i'll be able to edit the wiki. Looks good to me, all pushed. Thanks for this, and go ahead and move that easy hack

[Libreoffice] [Patch] RTL_CONSTASCII_USTRINGPARAM for some files part2

Hello, Here is a patch for some files (LGPLv3+ / MPL) Julien commit 12ed8ec48418ac20a50e8a097e1a5e78f0c99cbb Author: serval Date: Sun Dec 19 14:46:27 2010 +0100 RTL_CONSTASCII_USTRINGPARAM diff --git a/forms/source/inc/FormComponent.hxx b/forms/source/inc/FormComponent.hxx index 0beb5

Re: [Libreoffice] Request for review

On Wed, 2010-12-22 at 12:39 -0500, Kohei Yoshida wrote: > I feel confident that this change won't introduce any regressions. > Could someone review this and give me a sign-off? Well, I think this is good anyway. Go for it I reckon, though I'm somewhat biased :-) C. __

[Libreoffice] Status of PDF export of docs containing EPS graphics

Hi, Could someone clarify the status of the PDF export of docs containing EPS graphics. Is there some difference with OOo 3.3.0 regarding issue 14163 : http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=14163 ? Best regards JBF -- Seuls des formats ouverts peuvent assurer la pérennité de vos docu

Re: [Libreoffice] Better wording for 'Update links' question

On Wed, 2010-12-22 at 13:06 -0500, Joe Smith wrote: > On 12/21/2010 12:09 PM, Jan Holesovsky wrote: > > Hi, > > > > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32548 > > > > The bug says: when I open a certain .odp document, I get a pop-up > > question asking "Update all links? Yes/No" > > > > Any

[Libreoffice] Impress : where is the movie I have inserted in my slideshow ?

Hi, When you insert a movie in a slideshow by Insert > Movie and Sound there is a small problem: it is impossible to retrieve the path of the inserted file. It is not listed in Edit > Links... That is very annoying: for example if you want to move the slideshow to another location you need to move

[Libreoffice] Suggestion for Windows building

Hello, I compile LO on Linux but I have a notebook in dualboot with Windows Vista. I'd like to compile on Windows Vista with all the possible modules (Mozilla, NSS, directx, etc.). I read this : http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Native_Build and of course this : http://wiki.docume

Re: [Libreoffice] [UX] [PATCH] EasyHacks 3.27 Change Sheet copy process

On Wed, 2010-12-22 at 19:30 +0100, Joost Eekhoorn wrote: > Hi all, > > If you now give for "Sheet1" a new name, e.g."SheetA" and that name > exists, the new name will become "SheetA_2" without a question for the > user. Sure. I said I implemented "some aspect" of it, and this is one of those cas

[Libreoffice] [Easy Hacks] Creating OUString

Hi all, I have had a look on the "Use RTL_CONSTASCII_USTRINGPARAM macro" task. Lot of module have his own macro to transform an ASCII string to an OUString : CREATE_OUSTRING, OUSTR, UNISTRING, C2U

Re: [Libreoffice] sw: numbering misbehaviour

On Tue, 21 Dec 2010 12:50:07 -0800, Caolán McNamara wrote: Hum, a little bit of a mess I guess. I suppose we need to decide what we want to happen, and I missed out on the earlier discussions about this. so here's what we've got at the moment I think ? My tests on LO 3.3 Beta show otherwise.

Re: [Libreoffice] [UX] [PATCH] EasyHacks 3.27 Change Sheet copy process

Hi all, If you now give for "Sheet1" a new name, e.g."SheetA" and that name exists, the new name will become "SheetA_2" without a question for the user. Joost 2010/12/22 Kohei Yoshida > On Wed, 2010-12-22 at 12:48 +0100, Joost Eekhoorn wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > The proposed layout change of B

Re: [Libreoffice] Better wording for 'Update links' question

On 12/21/2010 12:09 PM, Jan Holesovsky wrote: Hi, https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32548 The bug says: when I open a certain .odp document, I get a pop-up question asking "Update all links? Yes/No" Anybody who knows this functionality, can you please provide a better wording? ;-)

[Libreoffice] [Patch] Remove bogus macro...

Hi, You will find attached 2 patches to complete the easy task "Remove bogus macro..". When you will be OK, i'll be able to edit the wiki. Thanks again for your friendly welcome on this maling-list ! Guillaume. >From cd375808b626d022d6d650e541382d6ba7854e9e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Gu

Re: [Libreoffice] Request for review

On Wed, 2010-12-22 at 12:39 -0500, Kohei Yoshida wrote: > I just fixed this bug > > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32572 > > which originally came from Caolan. > > The fix is committed on master, but I think we can apply this to 3.3 > branch as well. > > I feel confident that this

[Libreoffice] Request for review

I just fixed this bug https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32572 which originally came from Caolan. The fix is committed on master, but I think we can apply this to 3.3 branch as well. I feel confident that this change won't introduce any regressions. Could someone review this and give

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] Updates for Lightproof

Hi, Please review the attached patch that provide updated support for Ligthproof extension integration for 3.3.x series. Thank you in advance! Best regards, KAMI From 8c7538f9d61b097ac779f28f36c8f408bce9b6a8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Kalman Szalai - KAMI Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 19:28:42 +

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Fix-font-assignation-of-extra-fonts

Sorry, my mistake. Attached. KAMI 2010-12-22 11:09 keltezéssel, Radek Doulik írta: > Hi KAMI, > > I don't see the patch attached, maybe you forgot it? > > Cheers > Radek > > On Tue, 2010-12-21 at 09:47 +0100, Kálmán „KAMI” Szalai wrote: >> Fix SCP2/ extra font file assign problem. >> >> Please r

Re: [Libreoffice] [Patch] [Easy task] Remove bogus macro that expand to empty string

Hello Guillaume, On Wed, 2010-12-22 at 17:53 +0100, Guillaume Poussel wrote: > I was not sure about git diff or git format-patch. Next time it would > be better :) Don't hesitate to join the IRC channel #libreoffice to raise questions like this: there are several git experts hanging there (maybe

Re: [Libreoffice] [Patch] [Easy task] Remove bogus macro that expand to empty string

Thank you for your welcome ! I was not sure about /git diff/ or /git format-patch/. Next time it would be better :) I'm studying in Sophia-Antipolis, near to Nice, more precisely in Polytech'Nice-Sophia . I'm not sure to be able to convince my teachers, but i will

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Change of the color of the watermark at the pdfexport

Hi Andrea, Thorsten, *, Am Dienstag, 21. Dezember 2010, 23:01:13 schrieb Andrea Pescetti: (...) > Take this just as a comment and not criticism (I congratulate with > Andreas too for his first patch!), but replacing a hard-coded value by > another hard-coded value on the basis that, more or less,

[Libreoffice] Please have a look (possibly redundant 256x256 icons in soffice.bin)

Quoted from here (translated from Russian to English by Google): http://translate.google.ru/translate?hl=ru&sl=ru&tl=en&u=http%3A%2F%2Fforumooo.ru%2Findex.php%2Ftopic%2C1189.msg9066.html%23msg9066 Resource "icons" file soffice.bin similar resource (copied) "namesake" of soffice.exe. Therefore, t

Re: [Libreoffice] [UX] [PATCH] EasyHacks 3.27 Change Sheet copy process

On Wed, 2010-12-22 at 12:48 +0100, Joost Eekhoorn wrote: > Hi all, > > The proposed layout change of Bernhard looks good to me, but there are > some pitfalls. > > > Christoph wrote: > > [...] > > * If the user copies a sheet (several sheets) within the same > > file, then the new sheets

[Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Re: [Patch] RTL_CONSTASCII_USTRINGPARAM for some files

On Tue, 2010-12-21 at 22:32 +0100, Julien Nabet wrote: > Hello, > > Here is a patch for some files Works for me, pushed now after passing a build with the SAL_N_ELEMENTS as compile-time test. Thanks for this. C. ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffic

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] remove dead codes never passed through even in case of MACOSX

Hi Radek, On Wed, 22 Dec 2010 12:02:57 +0100, Radek Doulik wrote: >> Still loitering on EasyHack 3.7, I encountered dead codes as attached. >> They seems safely removable because if -psn given, the call of >> InterpretCommandLineParameter() will catch it and return sal_True, so >> the lines in qu

Re: [Libreoffice] [UX] [PATCH] EasyHacks 3.27 Change Sheet copy process

Hello Christoph! On Tue, 2010-12-21 at 23:18 +0100, Christoph Noack wrote: > Hi Kohei, hi Joost, hi dev list members! > > It seems that I still miss a good way to sort and highlight IMAP > messages - I did not pay too much attention to this thread and totally > missed the CC "Christoph". Grrr & s

Re: [Libreoffice] howto tar or deb package

Hi, On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 03:41:33PM +0100, Sebastian Spaeth wrote: > On Wed, 22 Dec 2010 10:07:31 +0100, Ralf Saalmüller > wrote: > > Is there a way to make a package or to build a deb package? A howto? > > It is a little bit of a mess to tell people it will work but you have > > to run t

Re: [Libreoffice] [Patch] [Easy task] Remove bogus macro that expand to empty string

Bonjour Guillaume, On Wed, 2010-12-22 at 11:47 +0100, Guillaume Poussel wrote: > I use LibreOffice almost every day and I'm interested in Open Source > softwares, so I would like to contribute. Then be welcomed among LibreOffice develers! > > I have grabbed the code and compile it. Then, i had

Re: [Libreoffice] howto tar or deb package

On Wed, 22 Dec 2010 10:07:31 +0100, Ralf Saalmüller wrote: > Is there a way to make a package or to build a deb package? A howto? > It is a little bit of a mess to tell people it will work but you have > to run the compiler all day long. Offering a community-build would be > great. ./confi

Re: [Libreoffice] Build errors

On 22/12/10 02:23, Balachandran Sivakumar wrote: call of overloaded 'append(char)' is ambiguous Hmm I never got that error but happily it seems Joseph Powers commited a fix for that, try pull and rebuild. thanks, Noel ___ LibreOffice mailing list Libr

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Basic Currency Issues #i31001# to #i107277#

On 22/12/10 10:13, Tor Lillqvist wrote: It seems that this patch is now in master, and it causes compilation errors on Windows (slightly edited compiler messages for brevity): sbxdec.cxx(735) : error C2065: 'n' : undeclared identifier sbxdec.cxx(749) : error C2039: 'pULong64' : is not a member

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Basic Currency Issues #i31001# to #i107277#

On 15/12/10 10:04, Noel Power wrote: Hi John, On 06/12/10 17:58, Noel Power wrote: Hi John, [...] in sbxToUnoValueImpl ( convert to uno without known target class ) in basic/source/classes/sbunoobj.cxx previously an Double or Float basic value ( within the range of an int ) was transfered a

Re: [Libreoffice] [UX] [PATCH] EasyHacks 3.27 Change Sheet copy process

Hi all, The proposed layout change of Bernhard looks good to me, but there are some pitfalls. > Christoph wrote: > [...] > * If the user copies a sheet (several sheets) within the same > file, then the new sheets will be renamed anyway. Right? > Although the user did not check the

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Remove unused code

On Wed, 2010-12-22 at 12:00 +0100, Radek Doulik wrote: > On Wed, 2010-12-22 at 11:29 +0100, Radek Doulik wrote: > > Hi Anders, > > > > thanks for your patch. Looks good to me so I pushed it. > > > > It contains sd/ module changes only though, so maybe you forget the ure > > part? > > ops, sorry.

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] remove dead codes never passed through even in case of MACOSX

Hi Takeshi, On Wed, 2010-12-22 at 17:21 +0900, Takeshi Abe wrote: > Hi, > > Still loitering on EasyHack 3.7, I encountered dead codes as attached. > They seems safely removable because if -psn given, the call of > InterpretCommandLineParameter() will catch it and return sal_True, so > the lines i

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Remove unused code

On Wed, 2010-12-22 at 11:29 +0100, Radek Doulik wrote: > Hi Anders, > > thanks for your patch. Looks good to me so I pushed it. > > It contains sd/ module changes only though, so maybe you forget the ure > part? ops, sorry. I managed to miss it when reading your mail, I will review it as well.

[Libreoffice] [Patch] [Easy task] Remove bogus macro that expand to empty string

Hi everybody, I use LibreOffice almost every day and I'm interested in Open Source softwares, so I would like to contribute. I have grabbed the code and compile it. Then, i had a look on the wiki and found an easy task : "Remove bogus macro that expand to empty string"

Re: [Libreoffice] Defective equation setter in LibreOffice (and OpenOffice)

On Tue, 2010-12-21 at 21:40 +, Caolán McNamara wrote: > On Tue, 2010-12-21 at 16:17 +, RSClymo wrote: > > To whoever it concerns: greeting. > > > > I wrote the following to Michael Meeks (after his article in Linux Format > > promoting LO (which I am trying): > > > > "In its parent OpenO

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Remove unused code

Hi Anders, thanks for your patch. Looks good to me so I pushed it. It contains sd/ module changes only though, so maybe you forget the ure part? Cheers Radek On Wed, 2010-12-22 at 08:31 +0100, Anders Jonsson wrote: > Some more unused code, this time in ure and impress. All code has been > comme

Re: [Libreoffice] [ Libreoffice ] [ UX ] [ PATCH ] EasyHacks 3.27 Change Sheet copy process

Hi all sorry: once more I didn't "reply all", just "reply" as on the other LibO lists... here is what I sent to Christoph alone: Hi Christoph, all, just a very short comment - before I forget it... Christoph Noack schrieb: > [...] >* Think about the "Insert Before" thing ... it is not

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Basic Currency Issues #i31001# to #i107277#

It seems that this patch is now in master, and it causes compilation errors on Windows (slightly edited compiler messages for brevity): sbxdec.cxx(735) : error C2065: 'n' : undeclared identifier sbxdec.cxx(749) : error C2039: 'pULong64' : is not a member of 'SbxValues' sbxdec.cxx(749) : error C38

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Fix Gallery module

Hi KAMI, thanks for the patch. Looks good so I pushed it. Cheers Radek On Tue, 2010-12-21 at 02:50 +0100, Kálmán „KAMI” Szalai wrote: > Trivial patch to fix some gallery file assign problem. > > -- > KAMI911Best regards, > > Kálmán „KAMI” Szalai | 神 | kami911 [at] gmail [dot] com > > > My f

[Libreoffice] [UX] Re: Better wording for 'Update links' question

Hi David, all! Am Mittwoch, den 22.12.2010, 11:56 +0800 schrieb David Nelson: > Hi, :-) > > So, re-working Hal's suggeston, we'd have: ??? > "This document contains one or more links to external media or other data. > Do you want to update all links to get the most recent content? > > Go to Ed

Re: [Libreoffice] howto tar or deb package

What distro are you using? If you are using ubuntu, on irc.freenode.net there is an ubuntu-packaging channel. they might be able to provide you some help with packaging of LO. On 12/22/10 10:07 AM, Ralf Saalmüller wrote: Hello to LibreOffice a short introduction: I use StarOffice / OOo / Libr

[Libreoffice] howto tar or deb package

Hello to LibreOffice a short introduction: I use StarOffice / OOo / LibreOffice since StarOffice 3.1 on Mac OS on the PowerPC. I still have a powerpc with Linux in use and I like to have LibreOffice on it. It was a 24h job but LibreOffice was made and is running on my PowerBook G4. I like

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] remove dead codes never passed through even in case of MACOSX

Hi, Still loitering on EasyHack 3.7, I encountered dead codes as attached. They seems safely removable because if -psn given, the call of InterpretCommandLineParameter() will catch it and return sal_True, so the lines in question will be never passed through. It looks odd noneththeless. Any though