Re: [Libreoffice] [UX] Some dirty stuffs around styles in calc

Hello Christoph, On Mon, 2010-12-06 at 23:54 +0100, Christoph Noack wrote: > thanks for having a look at that. And thanks for the good explanation! > It took me a while, since the problem is not only valid for Calc, but > also valid for all elements/documents that support protection. Hum, I shoul

[Libreoffice] Patch review requested

Please someone review my patch at https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32133 which fixes the aforementioned bug for 3.3. The patch in comment 7 is the one that needs reviewing. Thanks! Kohei -- Kohei Yoshida, LibreOffice hacker, Calc ___

Re: [Libreoffice] Comments on RC1

On 12/06/2010 05:15 PM, Jean-Baptiste Faure wrote: > Hi, > > Le 06/12/2010 23:10, Michael Meeks a écrit : >> Hi Sophie& Wols, >> >> On Mon, 2010-12-06 at 20:57 +0300, Sophie Gautier wrote: >>> - the Windows multilanguage installer is really a pain when you are on a >>> slow connexion >>

[Libreoffice] [Bug 31865] [Task]: LibreOffice 3.3 release blockers / stoppers

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31865 Kohei Yoshida changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||32133 --- Comment #24 from Kohei Yoshida

Re: [Libreoffice] [libreoffice-design] Developers, Designers and Vice Versa?

Hi Kohei, all! Am Montag, den 06.12.2010, 10:38 -0500 schrieb Kohei Yoshida: > On Sun, 2010-12-05 at 01:22 +0100, Christoph Noack wrote: > > (Note: This mail is cross-posted to both libreoff...@... and des...@...) > > > > Hi all, > > > > just a short question - is there anybody of you (developer

Re: [Libreoffice] Comments on RC1

Hi, Le 06/12/2010 23:10, Michael Meeks a écrit : > Hi Sophie & Wols, > > On Mon, 2010-12-06 at 20:57 +0300, Sophie Gautier wrote: >> - the Windows multilanguage installer is really a pain when you are on a >> slow connexion > It took under five minutes for me to download; 8Mbit, I can imagi

Re: [Libreoffice] Patch 5d02d745185dac83914fe62f608a9349fdbfd8dd review for 3.3

Hi Michael, 2010/12/6 Michael Meeks : > Hi Jesus, > > On Mon, 2010-12-06 at 17:38 +0100, Jesús Corrius wrote: >> I would like to propose the patch >> 5d02d745185dac83914fe62f608a9349fdbfd8dd for review to be integrated >> into the final 3.3 build. > >        ... > >> There are only a few modificat

Re: [Libreoffice] [UX] Some dirty stuffs around styles in calc

Hey Cedric, thanks for having a look at that. And thanks for the good explanation! It took me a while, since the problem is not only valid for Calc, but also valid for all elements/documents that support protection. I had a look at the OOO issue tracker and, wow, this seems to be on of the ancien

[Libreoffice] Including Pagination extention

Hi! I would like to know if there is a chance of including *Pagination *extension in final release of Libre Office? Many of my friends are asking, why there is no simple page numbering in OO.o or Libre Office. It would be nice to have this extension installed from the beginning. It makes it easier

Re: [Libreoffice] Comments on RC1

Hi Sophie & Wols, On Mon, 2010-12-06 at 20:57 +0300, Sophie Gautier wrote: > Like some other members of the L10n project, I'm not very happy with the > RC1 we provided: :-) > - the Windows multilanguage installer is really a pain when you are on a > slow connexion It took unde

Re: [Libreoffice] LibreOffice-Plug-In for Netbeans?

Hi Cedric, Am Montag, 6. Dezember 2010, 10:08:27 schrieb Cedric Bosdonnat: > Hi Andreas, > > On Sat, 2010-12-04 at 17:13 +0100, Andreas Mantke wrote: > > there is already a Netbeans-Plug-In for OOo. But this plug-in doesn't > > work for me with LibreOffice and it's SDK. Because of this I'm curiou

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] RTL_CONSTASCII_USTRINGPARAM for dbaccess/source/ui/dlg

Hello, Here's a small patch for dbaccess/source/ui/dlg Julien. (LGPLv3+ / MPL) commit 611a28b9fbafe37691865c023803a5a0b74b Author: serval Date: Mon Dec 6 22:36:51 2010 +0100 RTL_CONSTASCII_USTRINGPARAM for ConnectionHelper.cxx diff --git a/dbaccess/source/ui/dlg/ConnectionHelper.cxx

Re: [Libreoffice] Table behaviour in Writer

On Mon, 2010-12-06 at 18:00 +0200, Hillar Liiv wrote: > Hello, > > > Table should behave like chart/image when manipulating it in Writer: > * One click to resize, move; > * Double click to modify content. We're talking about normal tables in writer, right ?. A double click to enter te

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Basic Currency Issues #i31001# to #i107277#

Noel Power wrote: > b) I also made some changes [one change I made was in ImpCurrencyToString > ...] > so I think it makes sense for me to > create the feature branch ( I will do that today ) Understandable, I apologize that I did not separate the core Currency changes from the string handling '

Re: [Libreoffice] Patch 5d02d745185dac83914fe62f608a9349fdbfd8dd review for 3.3

Hi Jesus, On Mon, 2010-12-06 at 17:38 +0100, Jesús Corrius wrote: > I would like to propose the patch > 5d02d745185dac83914fe62f608a9349fdbfd8dd for review to be integrated > into the final 3.3 build. ... > There are only a few modifications in the Catalan sdf file and they > successfull

Re: [Libreoffice] Comments on RC1

On 06/12/10 18:49, Rene Engelhard wrote: > Is that really a argument now that most people use broadband? Should we > really care about those wo don't (and downlaod a new version every few > months?) What about those people who *C*an't use broadband? Okay, I wouldn't call 2Mb slow, but we still hav

Re: [Libreoffice] Comments on RC1

Hi, On Mon, Dec 06, 2010 at 08:57:11PM +0300, Sophie Gautier wrote: > Like some other members of the L10n project, I'm not very happy with > the RC1 we provided: > - the Windows multilanguage installer is really a pain when you are > on a slow connexion Is that really a argument now that most peo

Re: [Libreoffice] Patch for i115495: import problem with centered rtl tables from word

On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 8:09 PM, Jan Holesovsky wrote: > Hi Lior, > > On 2010-12-05 at 23:28 +0200, Lior Kaplan wrote: > > > Can any one look at the small patch attached to > > http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=115495 > > > > It would be nice to have this fixed in LibO 3.3, as this

Re: [Libreoffice] Patch for i115495: import problem with centered rtl tables from word

Hi Lior, On 2010-12-05 at 23:28 +0200, Lior Kaplan wrote: > Can any one look at the small patch attached to > http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=115495 > > It would be nice to have this fixed in LibO 3.3, as this annoys a lot > of users of the the RTL languages. We have this fix i

[Libreoffice] [Bug 31865] [Task]: LibreOffice 3.3 release blockers / stoppers

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31865 Rainer Bielefeld changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||32142 --- Comment #23 from Rainer Bie

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Basic Currency Issues #i31001# to #i107277#

Hi John, On 30/11/10 09:35, John LeMoyne Castle wrote: Currency is presently implemented with a 64bit struct of 2 Int32s and the math is done by the tools/bigint class. The attached patches replace the code to implement the Currency type with an ISO C99 compiler supported 64 bit integer. Abso

[Libreoffice] Comments on RC1

Hi all, Like some other members of the L10n project, I'm not very happy with the RC1 we provided: - the Windows multilanguage installer is really a pain when you are on a slow connexion - once you're done with the version, you realize that you do not get the help files, - no spellchecker is av

[Libreoffice] Patch 5d02d745185dac83914fe62f608a9349fdbfd8dd review for 3.3

Hi Thorsten, all, I would like to propose the patch 5d02d745185dac83914fe62f608a9349fdbfd8dd for review to be integrated into the final 3.3 build. There are only a few modifications in the Catalan sdf file and they successfully passed the gsicheck. The modifications are important. Cheers, --

Re: [Libreoffice] [libreoffice-documentation] LibreOffice WikiHelp

Hi Kendy, :-) On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 00:04, Jan Holesovsky wrote: > Hi, > > I am sorry - I promised the LibO online help (WikiHelp) already the last > week, but it haven't happened; it needed more work than anticipated :-( > > Either way, the good news is that I am currently uploading the files,

Re: [Libreoffice] Release criteria

Andrea Pescetti píše v Ne 05. 12. 2010 v 18:39 +0100: > On 26/11/2010 Petr Mladek wrote: > > http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Release_Criteria > > Feel free to update it or propose improvements. Especially, I am not > > sure about bugs in localizations. > > So a major change with respect to the

[Libreoffice] Commit notifications (was: Use GtkStatusIcon instead of libegg)

On Mon, 06 Dec 2010 16:12:50 +, Christopher Backhouse wrote: > PS - is there a git commit notification list I can subscribe to? The git > web interface is a royal pain to navigate. You could subscribe to the RSS feed at: http://cia.vc/stats/project/LibreOffice which should give you reason

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Use GtkStatusIcon instead of libegg

On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 10:12 AM, Christopher Backhouse wrote: ... > > Chris > > PS - is there a git commit notification list I can subscribe to? The git web > interface is a royal pain to navigate. http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-commits > > ___

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Use GtkStatusIcon instead of libegg

On 06/12/2010 15:47, Michael Meeks wrote: Yes - it's a pain; hence doing it for you. I was thinking of more exciting fun / new things :-) Thanks. We rather need someone clueful to tackle the problem of the flat ODF / XML export - if you're interested ? http://wiki.documentfoundation.

[Libreoffice] LibreOffice WikiHelp

Hi, I am sorry - I promised the LibO online help (WikiHelp) already the last week, but it haven't happened; it needed more work than anticipated :-( Either way, the good news is that I am currently uploading the files, and I'll make the site online as soon as it finishes, and I do few trivial che

[Libreoffice] Table behaviour in Writer

Hello, I don't know is this the right place to feature request/bug: Table should behave like chart/image when manipulating it in Writer: - One click to resize, move; - Double click to modify content. Now there is no way to wrap table differently (like images/chart) than default. No way to

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Use GtkStatusIcon instead of libegg

Hi David, On Mon, 2010-12-06 at 15:18 +0100, David Tardon wrote: > On Mon, Dec 06, 2010 at 02:08:36PM +, Michael Meeks wrote: > > Really ? as soon as the X server dies, we'll get all manner of XErrors > > that will kill us nastily; I don't see a feature there, but perhaps I'm > > missing i

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Use GtkStatusIcon instead of libegg

On Mon, 2010-12-06 at 15:01 +, Christopher Backhouse wrote: > I have locally a check against the gtk version (the highest version Heh - sorry pardon; I just added that to configure - we disable the gtk + systray where we know it won't work there; and that also fixes the scp2 issues y

[Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Re: Fw: occured occurred

On Mon, 2010-12-06 at 21:27 +0900, Takeshi Abe wrote: > Sorry again, but could you apply the below to bootstrap? Yup, done now. Thanks for this. C. ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/list

Re: [Libreoffice] [libreoffice-design] Developers, Designers and Vice Versa?

Hi Christoph, On Sun, 2010-12-05 at 01:22 +0100, Christoph Noack wrote: > (Note: This mail is cross-posted to both libreoff...@... and des...@...) > > Hi all, > > just a short question - is there anybody of you (developers) on the > Design mailing list as well? I'm on the design list too, but I

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Use GtkStatusIcon instead of libegg (Spam Message)

On Mon, 2010-12-06 at 15:24 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth wrote: > Perhaps removing the bundled libegg project and disable copying it in > our install package? :-) Already done :-) Regards, Michael. -- michael.me...@novell.com <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Use GtkStatusIcon instead of libegg

On 06/12/2010 14:08, Michael Meeks wrote: I gave it a reasonble test, of all the combinations I could think of [ though not session exit ], and I've pushed it. Cool, thanks. On 06/12/2010 14:08, Michael Meeks wrote: I guess, since SLED10 ships with gtk+ 2.8.11 or something cra

[Libreoffice] [Bug 31865] [Task]: LibreOffice 3.3 release blockers / stoppers

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31865 Bug 31865 depends on bug 31770, which changed state. Bug 31770 Summary: BrOffice brand and LibreOffice https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31770 What|Old Value |New Value

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Use GtkStatusIcon instead of libegg

On Mon, 06 Dec 2010 14:08:36 +, Michael Meeks wrote: > Thanks so much for this Christopher ! what is your next planned > feat ? :-) Perhaps removing the bundled libegg project and disable copying it in our install package? :-) Sebastian pgpfAQ227kXmt.pgp Description: PGP signature ___

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Use GtkStatusIcon instead of libegg

On Mon, Dec 06, 2010 at 02:08:36PM +, Michael Meeks wrote: > > On Mon, 2010-12-06 at 08:30 +0100, David Tardon wrote: > > The current impl. shutdowns LibO when desktop session is ended. Unless > > I'm missing something obvious, the new impl. cannot do that... > > Really ? as soon as the

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Use GtkStatusIcon instead of libegg

On Mon, 2010-12-06 at 08:30 +0100, David Tardon wrote: > The current impl. shutdowns LibO when desktop session is ended. Unless > I'm missing something obvious, the new impl. cannot do that... Really ? as soon as the X server dies, we'll get all manner of XErrors that will kill us nastily

Re: [Libreoffice] Java build problem identified | findhome | MacOSX location ?

Hi *, On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 2:21 PM, Wols Lists wrote: > On 06/12/10 12:57, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: > > The problem as I saw it was making sure Mac still went through the old > path first, because findhome is successful but returns a dud path. Yes - having the Mac check first is perfectly fine,

Re: [Libreoffice] Java build problem identified | findhome | MacOSX location ?

Ok, I pushed a new version that should be doing 'The Right thing(tm)' on MacOS It is still doing the readlink stuf on other platforms... Norbert On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 7:21 AM, Wols Lists wrote: > On 06/12/10 12:57, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: >>> Hmm - but the result of the IRC-discussion was to u

Re: [Libreoffice] Java build problem identified | findhome | MacOSX location ?

On 06/12/10 12:57, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: >> Hmm - but the result of the IRC-discussion was to use (for Mac) >> > /usr/libexec/java_home where available (10.5 and newer), and the >> > hardcoded fallbackpath of either >> > /System/Library/Frameworks/JavaVM.framework/Versions/CurrentJDK/Home >> > or

Re: [Libreoffice] Java build problem identified | findhome | MacOSX location ?

On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 6:53 AM, Christian Lohmaier wrote: > Hi Norbert, *, > > On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 8:28 AM, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: >> On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 9:39 PM, Thorsten Behrens >> wrote: >>> Caolan McNamara wrote: IIRC I tried this before, and there was some cockup under MacOSX, s

Re: [Libreoffice] Java build problem identified | findhome | MacOSX location ?

Hi Norbert, *, On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 8:28 AM, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: > On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 9:39 PM, Thorsten Behrens > wrote: >> Caolan McNamara wrote: >>> IIRC I tried this before, and there was some cockup under MacOSX, so if >>> someone on MacOSX could see what findhome says and if its c

Re: [Libreoffice] Java build problem identified | findhome | MacOSX location ?

On Mon, 2010-12-06 at 01:28 -0600, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: > Cloph, Wol and me have been working on it on IRC, resulting in > bootstrap:474e4b60fec1f859bc16f268d6340d7850c7874e Well, if it works it works. Still think that all the readlink stuff before trying findhome.java is fairly dubious and tha

[Libreoffice] Fw: occured occurred

Sorry again, but could you apply the below to bootstrap? Cheers, -- Takeshi Abe --- Begin Message --- Hi, On Sat, 04 Dec 2010 14:35:29 +0900 (JST), Takeshi Abe wrote: > OK, I end up getting sane so that replacing them with git & sed has done > by the attached script. After runnging it on each g

Re: [Libreoffice] "bad value (atom) for -mtune= switch" on boostrap build

On Sun, 2010-12-05 at 08:06 +0900, Takeshi Abe wrote: > > apparently -mtune=atom require gcc 4.5. I think that commit need to > Thanks for that information. I became eager for gcc 4.5 :) Lol :-) the background here is (AFAIR) that in the Atom - in order to get the die area down to some t

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Re: occured occurred

On Mon, 2010-12-06 at 10:06 +, Wols Lists wrote: > On 06/12/10 09:53, Takeshi Abe wrote: > >> I'm not adverse to changing that API, but its something we should plan > >> > for and bundle a whole set of changes together for. > > One possible way to gracefully diverge the APIs is providing new AP

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] [PATCH] Clean code at impress

Hi Kayo On Sun, 2010-12-05 at 14:37 -0800, Kayo Hamid wrote: > Sending for review, cover sd/slideshow/* > > revol_ > Pushed, I didn't commit the changes to slideshow/source/engine/sp_debug.cxx as I find those comment telling what #ifdef the #endif closes very useful. Thanks muchly for the nice pa

[Libreoffice] [Pushed] Remove __FAR_DATA [PATCH]

Hi Michael, On Sun, 2010-12-05 at 16:53 -0700, calla...@xmission.com wrote: > Here are patches to the various git repositories to remove the empty > __FAR_DATA macro from solar.h. Thanks ! lovely stuff :-) Its amusing to see the construct used even in quite new code; RIP segmented memor

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Basic Currency Issues #i31001# to #i107277#

Hi John, On Tue, 2010-11-30 at 04:22 -0700, Noel Power wrote: > > Main patch makes 1/2 kLOC reduction in sbx. > yeah, so you will have to give me some time to look at this ( not really > familar with the Currently type ) and I need to somehow filter out the > whitespace changes too ( probably I can

Re: [Libreoffice] Patch for i115495: import problem with centered rtl tables from word

On Sun, 2010-12-05 at 23:28 +0200, Lior Kaplan wrote: > Hi, > > Can any one look at the small patch attached to > http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=115495 > > It would be nice to have this fixed in LibO 3.3, as this annoys a lot > of users of the the RTL languages. > > Thanks > >

Re: [Libreoffice] RC1 Help

On Mon, 2010-12-06 at 10:23 +0100, Jan Holesovsky wrote: > > can someone please urgently check > > ? > > Sorry for being late with this, but just today I am moving the test > installation of help.libreoffice.org to the real one. My fau

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Re: occured occurred

On 06/12/10 09:53, Takeshi Abe wrote: >> I'm not adverse to changing that API, but its something we should plan >> > for and bundle a whole set of changes together for. > One possible way to gracefully diverge the APIs is providing new API/ABI > with old obsolete ones in the meanwhile, that allow u

[Libreoffice] [Bug 31865] [Task]: LibreOffice 3.3 release blockers / stoppers

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31865 --- Comment #22 from Michael Meeks 2010-12-06 02:01:18 PST --- suggest add 32126 (Oracle mention wrt. ODF icons & formats in alt text). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this m

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Re: occured occurred

Hi Caolán, On Mon, 06 Dec 2010 09:18:48 +, Caolán McNamara wrote: > On Sun, 2010-12-05 at 19:09 +, Caolán McNamara wrote: >> On Sat, 2010-12-04 at 14:35 +0900, Takeshi Abe wrote: >> >> I'm reading through these at the moment and applying them. >> >> So far so good, will have to skip the

Re: [Libreoffice] binfilter and features...

On Sun, 2010-12-05 at 21:23 +0100, Pierre-André Jacquod wrote: > I was thinking of taking a 2 steps approach: first silent warning in a > conservative way (this is also less risk to introduce bugs) and then to > "down-size" the module just keeping the needed part. That works for me. > In my opini

Re: [Libreoffice] RC1 Help

Hi Rainer, On 2010-12-05 at 14:27 +0100, Rainer Bielefeld wrote: > can someone please urgently check > ? Sorry for being late with this, but just today I am moving the test installation of help.libreoffice.org to the real one. Regards, Kendy

[Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Re: occured occurred

On Sun, 2010-12-05 at 19:09 +, Caolán McNamara wrote: > On Sat, 2010-12-04 at 14:35 +0900, Takeshi Abe wrote: > > I'm reading through these at the moment and applying them. > > So far so good, will have to skip the ones that change the external API > in offapi however I think. Hmm. Right, so

[Libreoffice] TOPLU YEMEK FİYAT TEKLİFİMİZ

Yeni Sayfa 1 BEYAZSAYFA 50 Kişi ve üzeri personel çal

Re: [Libreoffice] LibreOffice-Plug-In for Netbeans?

Hi Andreas, On Sat, 2010-12-04 at 17:13 +0100, Andreas Mantke wrote: > there is already a Netbeans-Plug-In for OOo. But this plug-in doesn't work > for me > with LibreOffice and it's SDK. Because of this I'm curious, if someone is > working on > such a plug-in for LibreOffice. It's very unlik