On Sun, 2010-12-05 at 21:23 +0100, Pierre-André Jacquod wrote: > I was thinking of taking a 2 steps approach: first silent warning in a > conservative way (this is also less risk to introduce bugs) and then to > "down-size" the module just keeping the needed part.
That works for me. > In my opinion, the needed part would be, for the next releases, just the > read capability of (older?) binary format build in within LibO. If we didn't currently have the capability to write them I definitely wouldn't be in favour of adding it. But seeing as we already have the capability of writing them, I wonder if we should retain it, on the other hand, maybe this is the best route to take :-), drop support for writing new ones and help prod the format into extinction. > Is there a "technical" steering committee for this kind of decision, where we > could propose / give reasons for thinking this or that? There is alright, a phonecon typically once a week or so. maybe we can put this topic on the agenda and you could dial in if its at a suitable time. C. _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
