hi christian,
haha i suppose you have been spammed a couple of times *disclaimer* only
send you email once.
anyways, i do not fully understand what you mean but i will read the blog to
explore. thanks and will get back to you.
rgds
- Original Message -
From: "Christian Lohmaier"
On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 17:28:46 +, Michael Meeks wrote:
> Fun - so, of course, statistics without a robust interpretation can be
> rather dangerous :-)
Right, and netto LOC is a pretty bad measure of productivity and
effectiveness, even if things like COCOMO (?) models andwhatnot suggest
ot
There's a OOo bug
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=84159which describes
a crash happening if document has too much formatting. This
also applies to LO. It usually happens at closing the document but can also
happen at some other (almost) random times.
There's also a fix ready for t
Hi there,
JFYI, I started using target: (e.g. target:3.3.1 for the next
version) in the whiteboard of our bugzilla to be able to sort bugs by
target versions. If some of you work like I do and need to sort bugs
this way, it's probably a good idea to use consistent scheme here.
BTW, this is not t
Hello Jonas,
> I think the patch looks great, I've pushed it... But when we need to
> draw a thin solid line under the visual line that the caret is in, we
> will probably need to pass a boolean value to SmCursor::Draw in
> SmGraphicWindow::Paint and from SmCursor::Draw to
> SmCaretDrawingVisitor.
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 12:50:40PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > Maybe sb did that quite a while ago, see
> > c37c9bf77d3ae02fb14b1d053e8c249a584f5e00 of jvmaccess/util/gcc3.map ? Is
> > that it ?
>
> Maybe, but that commit message doesn't explain why those versions are gone
> (and from re
regards
>From ed5503c8a32a6fa2d41b73e199e6184eb9e0b15b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: pjacquod
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 20:26:46 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 12/12] RTL_CONSTASCII_USTRINGPARAM in components - xmlsecurity- helpd
remove rtl::oustring::createfromascii("foo") and code clean up:
suppression of
regards
>From 10ef6191861dab201993db7c01e5adf4d12fc415 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: pjacquod
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 00:43:12 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 11/12] RTL_CONSTASCII_USTRINGPARAM components - zipapi
components/package/source/zipapi should be OK now
---
package/source/zipapi/XUnbufferedStrea
regards
>From 2f86aef63beb00992aa720ddf86c5236c6fecc26 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: pjacquod
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 00:40:44 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 10/12] RTL_CONSTASCII_USTRINGPARAM components - zippackage
components/package/source/zippackage should be OK now
---
package/source/zippackage/Zi
regards
>From 14c040c9a7e20c49c2edb9fdc9185a2fda93362f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: pjacquod
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 00:36:35 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 09/12] RTL_CONSTASCII_USTRINGPARAM in components - xstor
components/package/source/xstor should be OK now
---
package/source/xstor/owriteablestream
regards
>From b82fc44186adb943a95eeaa369d49719ea47fd6c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: pjacquod
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 00:09:27 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 08/12] RTL_CONSTASCII_USTRINGPARAM in components misc
components/forms/source/misc should be OK now
---
forms/source/misc/InterfaceContainer.cxx |
regards
>From ab42a6a840da58f039398b7f64eaa68c4560b3cd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: pjacquod
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 23:59:34 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 07/12] RTL_CONSTASCII_USTRINGPARAM components in runtime
components/forms/source/runtime should be OK now
---
forms/source/runtime/formoperations.
regards
>From 2bf8ae72c9787a733cb2992d8c409593fb1f7bab Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: pjacquod
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 23:57:03 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 06/12] RTL_CONSTASCII_USTRINGPARAM components xpathlib
components/forms/source/xforms/xpathlib should now be OK
---
forms/source/xforms/xpathlib/ex
regards
>From ae0569887c2f327499ff060a12594f50035319ac Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: pjacquod
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 23:52:56 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 05/12] RTL_CONSTASCII_USTRINGPARAM in components .. submission
components/forms/source/xforms/submission should be OK now
---
forms/source/xforms/s
regards
>From 35e91cd08c4ba6fb1078a347d8736670fe6faf13 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: pjacquod
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 23:44:15 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 04/12] RTL_CONSTASCII_USTRINGPARAM in components - inc
components/forms/source/inc should be OK now
---
forms/source/inc/FormComponent.hxx |
regards
>From f749c776fb979ee6700ce9477ae5b70b3b49d77c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: pjacquod
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 23:38:11 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 03/12] RTL_CONSTASCII_USTRINGPARAM in components - forms
the whole directory components/forms/source/component
should now be OK
---
forms/source
On 11/16/2010 10:37 PM, Pierre-André Jacquod wrote:
> Hello,
> being off for some days, here the collection of patches I produced in
> between. Each patch concern the cleaning of directory, this will allow
> to review / descard some parts if needed.
> best regards
> pjacquod
>
>
>
>
Hello,
being off for some days, here the collection of patches I produced in
between. Each patch concern the cleaning of directory, this will allow
to review / descard some parts if needed.
best regards
pjacquod
>From c3b35d242fc9973d198571e19d37e7e12b746d97 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: pjacquod
I see that Fridrich already pushed this one.
C.
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Hi Sebastian,
I had a quick look through the updated Default and Hicontrast sets.The
following is a list of 'features' spotted...
* brand/shell * Still in Default (not sure if this is used? Would suggest
deletion...):backing_hc-pt_BR.png , backing_right_hc-pt_BR.png
All artwork in hicontrast is
Hi,
this time a brief summary of what happened the 7th week on LibreOffice
repos and two living branches:
bugfixes-master-week-45.txt lists all commits that reference a proper
bug id (from a variety of trackers - #i... referring to the OpenOffice
issuezilla, fdo# to freedesktop, rhbz# to RedHat b
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 05:22:48PM +0100, Giuseppe Castagno wrote:
> Tor Lillqvist wrote:
> >>Now what it's the right flag to use to surround a debug specific
> >>code: OSL_DEBUG_LEVEL > 1 or DBG_UTIL ?
> >
> >I recently did a build with --enable-dbgutil so that it would use the
> >debugging C++ l
Hi guys,
Was just looking at the pmap output of LibreOffice on windows, and was
somewhat startled to discover that we are linking the presenter console
extension, even when we start only writer: which seems somewhat amazing,
and might point to a deeper performance problem.
Any vol
Hi Peter,
On Sun, 2010-11-07 at 18:24 +1000, Peter Dolding wrote:
> Issue is one of the special features of that mode.
:-)
> http://www.gnu.org/software/hello/manual/automake/maintainer_002dmode.html
> from here the key point is.
>
> >>AM_MAINTAINER_MODE also allows you to disable som
On Mon, 2010-11-15 at 18:11 +0100, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
> basically implement similar functionality like in excel where you can
> double click on the tab to rename it with a name that a user can
> understand. instead of sheet 1 etc
Oh - so, currently if you double-click the sheet tab,
Hi there,
On Tue, 2010-11-16 at 15:51 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth wrote:
> Hi all, here some nice stats. Summary, is that we lost 34,000 lines of
> code since we started to code on LO...
Fun - so, of course, statistics without a robust interpretation can be
rather dangerous :-)
Perso
Done, Sir, thanks for making up for my forgetful brain
Cheers
Fridrich
On Tue, 2010-11-16 at 16:54 +0200, Niko Rönkkö wrote:
> MPL 1.1 / GPLv3+ / LGPLv3+
>
> see:
> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/build/commit/?id=9e0f4d66e7b219baa142fe86f2167e37d8f8e6f7
> __
On Tue, 2010-11-16 at 09:04 -0700, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
> I would be very careful in using that number in any kind of bragging
> fashion, without very explicitly indicating what it measures, exactly.
> Of course, hard to do that in a short tweet, and it is bound to be
> misinterpreted.
Right - I u
Tor Lillqvist wrote:
Now what it's the right flag to use to surround a debug specific code:
OSL_DEBUG_LEVEL > 1 or DBG_UTIL ?
I recently did a build with --enable-dbgutil so that it would use the debugging
C++ library on Windows. (As such that was mostly useless, it didn't help me
find the ca
> #libreoffice developers put the #openoffice code on a diet / work-out
> regiment. After 6 weeks how did they do? 34,000 Lines of code lighter.
But isn't a lot of this lines of code that were commented out, or inside #if 0?
And how much of the change is due to changes in the OOo milestones that
Hi Eric, *,
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 10:26 PM, Eric Teng wrote:
>>> Ill like to know how to add label templates to libreoffice . we are a
>>> labels supplier located in singapore.
[snip]
You seem to have a problem with your mailer or with your patience :-)
To add your labels, create appropriate
On Tue, 2010-11-16 at 15:51 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth wrote:
> Summary, is that we lost 34,000 lines of
> code since we started to code on LO...
Howdy Sebastian,
Outstanding - this is a figure we are confident enough in to publish?
Sounds like it, but just to be sure..so, this is how I put it out
Hi Thorsten, *,
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 8:14 AM, Thorsten Behrens
wrote:
>
> after some more grepping, also adapted the readmes to only reference
> documentfoundation/libreoffice links. File is attached, would be
> cool if you could review it for correctness, language - and whether
> the links as
Fantastic- Will grab the archive. I will drop you an email with links to the
updated other themes.
I think the Classic theme should no longer be shipped, in the same way we
dropped Industrial.
I also can not see the point of including Oxygen, with less than 1% of original
artwork...
> From:
> As I think you're already discovered, you'll find "lxh" mentioned in
> a .src file in svtools, and it'll have a matching define in the
> associaated .hrc, so you need to remove the HICONSTRAST resource from
> the .src file, remove the define from the .hrc and then fix
> whatever .cxx and .hxx fil
On Sun, 2010-11-14 at 12:47 +, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> Michael mentioned to me that he had seen cases where
..
> I should note that none of these errors are new or have been introduced
> recently, but have been lurking in the code for quite a while.
..
> I've already found quite a few problem
> Now what it's the right flag to use to surround a debug specific code:
> OSL_DEBUG_LEVEL > 1 or DBG_UTIL ?
I recently did a build with --enable-dbgutil so that it would use the debugging
C++ library on Windows. (As such that was mostly useless, it didn't help me
find the cause of the problem
On Tue, 2010-11-16 at 12:34 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth wrote:
> Let me correct myself, I still get this failure. It suffices to go to
> svtools/util and issue dmake. But the name of the icons doesn't occur at
> all in svtools (or any other repo for that matter). So I have no clue
> where that is comin
- Forwarded message from Stephan Bergmann
-
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 13:12:28 +0100
From: Stephan Bergmann
To: relea...@openoffice.org
Subject: Re: [releases] Minutes for release status meeting from 2010-11-15
Reply-To: relea...@openoffice.org
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; SunOS i86pc;
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 12:23:40PM +0100, Henrik /KaarPoSoft
wrote:
> It has been suggested to remove fields-table-formula.diff.
> However, in the "apply" file, it is listed under [Fixes] which is
> included in "Common", which is included in every distro.
Except LibreOffice*, where even Common
On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 11:28:28 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth
wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 10:06:38 +, Nigel Hawkins wrote:
> > Just done a pull and am now getting a build error:
> > Entering .../build/rawbuild/svtools/util
> > Making:svten-US.res
> > Compiling: rsc_svt
> > f268: Error: The image
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 08:41:28AM +0100, Jan Holesovsky wrote:
> That's exactly the one I wanted to try/use, and still do not have it in
> my 1.7.3.1 (from
> http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/devel:/tools:/scm/SLE_11/) :-(
> Even the man page does not mention it here.
>
> Do you know if
Dear all,
I am trying to build libreoffice 3.2.99.3
In sw/util when making libswli.so I get:
../unxlngi6.pro/slo/cellfml.o: In function `lcl_ConvertWWFormula(String
const&)':
cellfml.cxx:(.text+0x29c4): undefined reference to
`ixion::formula_lexer::swap_tokens(boost::ptr_vectorboost::heap_clo
On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 10:06:38 +, Nigel Hawkins wrote:
> Just done a pull and am now getting a build error:
> Entering .../build/rawbuild/svtools/util
> Making:svten-US.res
> Compiling: rsc_svt
> f268: Error: The image(s) http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Just done a pull and am now getting a build error:
Entering .../build/rawbuild/svtools/util
Making:svten-US.res
Compiling: rsc_svt
f268: Error: The image(s) could not be found.
Terminating compiler
dmake: Error code 1, while making '../unxlngx6.pro/misc/rsc_svt'
Nigel
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 10:34:41AM +0100, Giuseppe Castagno wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> per subject, with a pull -r from this morning (CET), compiling sw with:
> build -P2 debug=true
>
Try pull again; commit f19fb8630f6dbf4b525bdd4ba775f05bb9d7e1a0 should
fix this.
D.
_
Hi all,
per subject, with a pull -r from this morning (CET), compiling sw with:
build -P2 debug=true
I get this:
compiling: sw/source/core/text/inftxt.cxx
Making:all_basflt.dpslo
Compiling: sw/source/filter/basflt/docfact.cxx
/home/beppe/LibO-b/LibO_master-head-wrk/wrk.d/clone/writer/sw/sou
On Tue, 02 Nov 2010 10:21:49 +, Michael Meeks
wrote:
> Currently our hicontrast theme is built by packimages/pack/makefile.mk:
>
> # generate the HiContrast icon set
> $(MISC)$/hicontrast.flag .PHONY :
> $(PERL) $(SOLARENV)$/bin$/hicontrast-to-theme.pl
> $(SOLARSRC)$/default_images
hey guys just hit me sitting here waiting for my lecture to start.
What goign to happen with internationalizing LO. I know projects like ubuntu
work with translating things upstream and then the translations get imported
into launchpad. any ideas or suggestions on whats going to happen. i can
cont
49 matches
Mail list logo
