On 17.03.2017 5:42, Vitaliy T wrote:
> Inside of MHD_connection_handle_read () src/microhttpd/connection.c is
> missing check against of the return value for the
> try_grow_read_buffer() call. It's just ignored. And now without a fear
> I may say that the INTERNAL_ERROR will be send for a connectio
On 17.03.2017 10:03, Evgeny Grin wrote:
> On 17.03.2017 5:42, Vitaliy T wrote:
>> As we can see the connection 127.0.0.1 port 47824 was suspended,
>> resumed and then again suspended.
>>
>> The server was run in epoll mode with 1 thread.
>> DEFAULT_HTTPD_CONNECTION_MEMORY_LIMIT = 128k
>> DEFAULT_
Hello,
On 17 March 2017 at 10:03, Evgeny Grin wrote:
> Please note that even if you suspend connection, you must process at
> least some data (preferably - all data) and decrement value of
> 'upload_data_size'.
Yes, this was my mistake. Before suspending a connection I have to
forgot about decre
On 17.03.2017 15:10, Vitaliy T wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 17 March 2017 at 10:03, Evgeny Grin wrote:
>> Please note that even if you suspend connection, you must process at
>> least some data (preferably - all data) and decrement value of
>> 'upload_data_size'.
>
> Yes, this was my mistake. Before
On 17 March 2017 at 15:43, Evgeny Grin wrote:
> You don't need to make this check only inside callback function. If you
> suspend connection and resume it later - connection conditions are not
> changed, you will not get any new information in callback. So you can
> store required information in y
On 17.03.2017 15:59, Vitaliy T wrote:
> On 17 March 2017 at 15:43, Evgeny Grin wrote:
>> You don't need to make this check only inside callback function. If you
>> suspend connection and resume it later - connection conditions are not
>> changed, you will not get any new information in callback. S
Websockets and RFC6455. I noticed the test_upgrade.c unit test code
doesn't provide the accept handshake key combination hashing specified on
page 8 of the RFC, in the section "opening handshake."
Apparently we're supposed to combine the websocket key with a predesignated
static GUID, hash it, an
On 03/18/2017 01:44 AM, John Duncan wrote:
> Websockets and RFC6455. I noticed the test_upgrade.c unit test code
> doesn't provide the accept handshake key combination hashing specified on
> page 8 of the RFC, in the section "opening handshake."
>
> Apparently we're supposed to combine the websoc
No problem. Thank you so much for your work on the library. It's great!
When I write some macros to do what's required I'll follow them up with a
mailing list post so others can use them if they want. Shouldn't take too
long to do.
~J
On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 2:55 PM, Christian Grothoff
wrote
Hello John,
I'm sure this example will be very useful for us! :-)
Thank you!
On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 9:59 PM, John Duncan
wrote:
> No problem. Thank you so much for your work on the library. It's great!
> When I write some macros to do what's required I'll follow them up with a
> mailing lis
Are you the same Silvio from the Defcon wolves among us talk? If so,
you're a god.
On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 3:05 PM, silvioprog wrote:
> Hello John,
>
> I'm sure this example will be very useful for us! :-)
>
> Thank you!
>
> On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 9:59 PM, John Duncan
> wrote:
>
>> No problem
Nevermind, was thinking of Silvio Cesare. He used to go by
silvioprogramming back in the 90s is why I asked. Sorry for the mixup!
On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 3:05 PM, silvioprog wrote:
> Hello John,
>
> I'm sure this example will be very useful for us! :-)
>
> Thank you!
>
> On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 a
Hehe :-D :-D
On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 11:29 PM, John Duncan
wrote:
> Nevermind, was thinking of Silvio Cesare. He used to go by
> silvioprogramming back in the 90s is why I asked. Sorry for the mixup!
>
> On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 3:05 PM, silvioprog wrote:
>
>> Hello John,
>>
>> I'm sure this e
13 matches
Mail list logo
