Are you the same Silvio from the Defcon wolves among us talk? If so, you're a god.
On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 3:05 PM, silvioprog <silviop...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello John, > > I'm sure this example will be very useful for us! :-) > > Thank you! > > On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 9:59 PM, John Duncan <toomanysit...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> No problem. Thank you so much for your work on the library. It's >> great! When I write some macros to do what's required I'll follow them up >> with a mailing list post so others can use them if they want. Shouldn't >> take too long to do. >> >> ~J >> >> On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 2:55 PM, Christian Grothoff <groth...@gnunet.org> >> wrote: >> >>> On 03/18/2017 01:44 AM, John Duncan wrote: >>> > Websockets and RFC6455. I noticed the test_upgrade.c unit test code >>> > doesn't provide the accept handshake key combination hashing specified >>> on >>> > page 8 of the RFC, in the section "opening handshake." >>> > >>> > Apparently we're supposed to combine the websocket key with a >>> predesignated >>> > static GUID, hash it, and send it back. Without doing this, current >>> > firefox refuses to accept a websocket connection to MHD. >>> > >>> > >>> > My question is, should I write this functionality myself or are there >>> plans >>> > for MHD to implement it in the future with macros or such? It seems >>> very >>> > easy to implement but I don't want to implement my own code if the >>> library >>> > has plans to implement this functionality for users directly. Don't >>> want >>> > to duplicate efforts etc. >>> >>> Right now, the expectation is that you need to write this yourself, at >>> least I have no plans to do more in terms of API than what we have today >>> with respect to "HTTP Upgrade". >>> >>> Happy hacking! >>> >>> Christian >>> >> > -- > Silvio Clécio >
