Hello John, I'm sure this example will be very useful for us! :-)
Thank you! On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 9:59 PM, John Duncan <toomanysit...@gmail.com> wrote: > No problem. Thank you so much for your work on the library. It's great! > When I write some macros to do what's required I'll follow them up with a > mailing list post so others can use them if they want. Shouldn't take too > long to do. > > ~J > > On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 2:55 PM, Christian Grothoff <groth...@gnunet.org> > wrote: > >> On 03/18/2017 01:44 AM, John Duncan wrote: >> > Websockets and RFC6455. I noticed the test_upgrade.c unit test code >> > doesn't provide the accept handshake key combination hashing specified >> on >> > page 8 of the RFC, in the section "opening handshake." >> > >> > Apparently we're supposed to combine the websocket key with a >> predesignated >> > static GUID, hash it, and send it back. Without doing this, current >> > firefox refuses to accept a websocket connection to MHD. >> > >> > >> > My question is, should I write this functionality myself or are there >> plans >> > for MHD to implement it in the future with macros or such? It seems >> very >> > easy to implement but I don't want to implement my own code if the >> library >> > has plans to implement this functionality for users directly. Don't >> want >> > to duplicate efforts etc. >> >> Right now, the expectation is that you need to write this yourself, at >> least I have no plans to do more in terms of API than what we have today >> with respect to "HTTP Upgrade". >> >> Happy hacking! >> >> Christian >> > -- Silvio Clécio
