Hello,
In the chapter 6.11, it says: « LFS should not be used in locales
that utilize multibyte character sets (including UTF-8) or
right-to-left writing order. Numerous unofficial and unstable patches
are required to fix these problems, and it has been decided by the LFS
developers not to suppor
Digimag wrote:
It's really impossible to have Unicode on my LFS distribution?
No, the editors were just being cautious. If you're interested, try Alexander
Patrakov's UTF-8 version of the LFS book
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~alexander/lfs-book/
Unfortunatly I
always use French, English
> Digimag wrote:
> > It's really impossible to have Unicode on my LFS distribution?
>
> No, the editors were just being cautious. If you're interested,
> try Alexander Patrakov's UTF-8 version of the LFS book
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~alexander/lfs-book/
I would like to try this also, s
On Sat, Dec 03, 2005 at 09:59:56PM +, Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Sat, 3 Dec 2005, Jeremy Henty wrote:
> >
> >I'm in Chapter 6.11.1 and the glibc test script gives me:
> >
> >make[2]: [/sources/glibc-build/posix/annexc.out] Error 1 (ignored)
> >
>
> [grumpy mode] What is it about '(ignored)' that y
--- Andrew Benton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Digimag wrote:
> > It's really impossible to have Unicode on my LFS
> distribution?
>
> No, the editors were just being cautious. If you're
> interested, try Alexander Patrakov's UTF-8 version
> of the LFS book
> http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~al
On Sun, Dec 04 2005 : 12:47:36, Andrew Benton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Digimag wrote:
>> It's really impossible to have Unicode on my LFS distribution?
>
>No, the editors were just being cautious. If you're interested, try Alexander
>Patrakov's UTF-8 version of the LFS book
>http://www.linuxfr
On Sun, 4 Dec 2005, Jeremy Henty wrote:
Yes, this particular test is expected to fail, and it will *not*
cause the whole testsuite to end with
make: *** [check] Error 2
If you see that, one or more of the tests really failed.
That's useful! It would be nice if the book documented that (a)
Jeremy Henty wrote:
> I compiled Linux From Scratch and all I got was this lousy command
> line!
Some like it lousy!
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
> Andrew Benton wrote:
> No, the editors were just being cautious. If you're
> interested, try Alexander Patrakov's UTF-8 version
> of the LFS book
> http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~alexander/lfs-book/
Thank you for this link.
> But you sent this message in charset=ISO-8859-1 ?
Yes, but it's jus
Hello all,
There had been a very strong reaction
from the LFS community. So i should like to requote my statements.
What i meant was the whole idea of
customizing the linux system sucks(before screaming at me please read
the whole mail first). Well to begin with i am a strong supporter of
open
Is there a list of the minimum requirements for a host system to
successfully compile the packages from LFS? More specifically, what
packages (and minimum versions) need to be installed on the existing
host?
The reason I'm asking is I'm attempting to do an LFS compile on my
Playstation 2, which i
Mezlo wrote:
Is there a list of the minimum requirements for a host system to
successfully compile the packages from LFS? More specifically, what
packages (and minimum versions) need to be installed on the existing host?
The reason I'm asking is I'm attempting to do an LFS compile on my
Plays
12 matches
Mail list logo
