CORRECTION!!
>On Tue, 15 Apr 2014 20:06:03 +0200
>Aleksandar Kuktin wrote:
>
> >On Tue, 15 Apr 2014 19:06:14 +0200
> >loki wrote:
> > 3.) Do I have to recreate the keys used for the users of OpenVPN?
> > (After I update OpenSSL)
>
> If they were not loa
>On Tue, 15 Apr 2014 19:06:14 +0200
>loki wrote:
> 1.) Is it enough for me to recompile only OpenSSL or do I have to
> recompile OpenSSH, apache, OpenVPN?
I have not yet looked at the patch that fixes CVE-2014-0160, but I
imagine that you do not need to recompile anything that dynamically
linkes
>On Wed, 02 Apr 2014 04:39:17 -0500
>William wrote:
> While I am experienced with both cfdisk and fdisk, what should I boot
> in order to use those utilities?
Anything that:
(a) has them
(b) is capable of detecting your HDD and changing bits on it (i.e. has
drivers for your hardware)
> If I boo
>On Sun, 30 Mar 2014 14:57:22 -0700
>Al Szymanski wrote:
>
> Thank you all for your rapid responses. In specific, Aleksandar asked:
> > Are these numbers your own estimates, or did you pick them up
> > somewhere? I'm asking because they overestimate.
>
> These numbers came directly from the 7.5
>On Sun, 30 Mar 2014 14:05:50 -0700
>Al Szymanski wrote:
>
> I am just trying to figure out the overall smallest size of hard
> drive space needed for all of the partitions. My sums from the 7.5
> book come to 80 Gig plus whatever space I want for /home .
> [ suggested partition sizes:
> ro
>On Sun, 23 Mar 2014 12:07:49 -0400
>baho utot wrote:
> I think there are not many folks that have that on a separate
> partition.
>
> That's really the only problem with using /var/run.
Although I did toy with the idea of changing my system to have /var on
a separate partition.
It's just that
>On Mon, 17 Feb 2014 12:17:29 + (GMT)
>Richard wrote:
> In keeping with the theme of Fernando's original suggestion, I have
> the source for 'surf' and it was simple to add a dozen lines of C to
> iterate over the entire plugin list and output the descriptions (and
> enabled flag) for each.
>
>On Sun, 16 Feb 2014 12:59:19 +0100
>Frans de Boer wrote:
>
> Dear All,
>
> It looks like most Linux distributions are switching to systemd from
> sysvinit. As Bruce is even one of the (co-?)authors of systemd, the
> knowledge is already in the house. Why would (x)LFS stick to sysvinit
> while
(Answering to both William and Bruce)
Okay, so that's how you solve that!
--
Svi moji e-mailovi su kriptografski potpisani. Proverite ih.
All of my e-mails are cryptographically signed. Verify them.
--
You don't need an AI for a robot uprising.
Humans will do just fine.
signature.asc
Descripti
>On Tue, 31 Dec 2013 07:49:11 -0600
>William Harrington wrote:
> After your whole build is done, you can use rm to remove them.
There is actually a problem with libtool and just rm-ing a static
library. I don't know the specifics of it, but subsequent build
attempts of other packages needing the
>On Sun, 20 Oct 2013 18:33:53 +0200
>Frans de Boer wrote:
> Like I said no page is the same and I noticed that you handle every
> site in a different way using customized regex's. That is exactly the
> thing I try to avoid, but given the nature of things I assume that
> would be hard to accomplis
>On Wed, 25 Sep 2013 09:56:34 +0800 (CST)
>Wiky wrote:
>
> I got it, Thank you.
>
> At 2013-09-25 09:49:36,"Aleksandar Kuktin" wrote:
> >>On Wed, 25 Sep 2013 08:41:37 +0800 (CST)
> >>Wiky wrote:
> >>
> >> hi,
> >>
>On Tue, 24 Sep 2013 17:37:28 -0700 (PDT)
>Phoebe Bacotot wrote:
>
> I have a problim compiling my samba...and this output were given
>
>
> client/smbmount.c:25:26: fatal error: linux/smb_fs.h: No such file or
> directory compilation terminated.
> The following command failed:
> gcc -I. -I/sourc
>On Wed, 25 Sep 2013 08:41:37 +0800 (CST)
>Wiky wrote:
>
> hi,
> It reads 'That is, we chroot into the temporary mini Linux
> system, ..' in Section6.1 of LFS7.4. but when i run 'sudo
> chroot /mnt/lfs', it returns 'chroot: failed to run command
> `/bin/bash': No such file or directory'. Of c
>On Fri, 30 Aug 2013 13:03:11 +0800
>Carl Martin Bacus wrote:
> root:/sources/glibc-build# for tz in etcetera southamerica
> northamerica europe africa antarctica \
> > asia australasia backward pacificnew solar87 solar88 solar89 \
> > systemv; do
> > zic -L /dev/null
> > -d $ZONEINFO
> > -y "sh
>On Fri, 16 Aug 2013 16:32:57 -0500
>William Harrington wrote:
>
>
> On Aug 16, 2013, at 3:09 PM, Aleksandar Kuktin wrote:
>
> > As stated above, you can use the LFS live CD although it is rather
> > old.
>
> Can't build current LFS with LFS 6.3 li
Hello and welcome. Feel as if at home.
>On Fri, 16 Aug 2013 19:46:24 +0100
>inquiring.m...@hushmail.com wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> 1. I just saw the LFS site and would like to try it but can't see the
> section that says how to download the source file packages ready to
> work through the programm
One of the great things about hanging around on LFS mail-lists is that
you often get to learn about new hardware (in this case Tyan stuff).
Specifically, about its existance.
>On Fri, 19 Jul 2013 03:13:51 +0200
>Esben Stien wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> I've confirmed that the kernel works fine as I st
>On Sun, 30 Jun 2013 16:24:47 +0800
>Chen Qi wrote:
>
> Thanks for your reply.
>
> I tried both approaches.
> No matter I used the 'defconfig + devtmpfs' approach or I used the
> 'host config file' approach, I always met the following error.
> '''
> VFS: Cannot open root device "sdb1" or unknown-
>On Sat, 29 Jun 2013 12:51:03 +0800
>Chen Qi wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I've followed all instructions in the LFS stable 7.3 book, and made a
> USB containing my LFS system.
>
> As I don't know exactly which drivers and modules should be compiled
> into my LFS kernel to make it work on my DELL lapto
>On Tue, 25 Jun 2013 12:56:35 +0300
>Sergey Shidlovsky wrote:
>
> Hi again! =)
>
> One more question, if you please.
>
> While adjusting toolchain, we do such search:
>
> **
> echo 'main(){}' > dummy.c
> cc dummy.c -v -Wl, --verbose &> dummy.log
>
>On Thu, 6 Jun 2013 17:49:18 +0200
>Philippe Delavalade wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> Thanks but I have just .bash_history in /root.
>
> Did I missed something ?
>
Just add it. Or put into $HOME/.bashrc . It doesn't matter if you don't
have the file RIGHT NOW, when you make it, bash will read and use
>On Thu, 16 May 2013 12:37:21 -0400
>alex lupu wrote:
>
> Am 16.5.2013 03:03, schrieb Stefan & Rebekka Wetter:
> > I wonder, why these patches are needed?
> > Are the upstream-sources not able to be compiled without?
>
> Good questions (as they say). While trying to stay on topic,
> I'll take th
>On Thu, 16 May 2013 15:22:19 -0300
>Fernando wrote:
>
> I have sent this in the morning, about 7 hours ago, it never appeared.
>
> Now, I have edited some words to see if the anti-spam was blocking
> them.
It arrived for me, as well as the follow-up email.
Perhaps Yahoo is also using the echo-
One other thing, although it qualifies as a false hope: it just may be
possible, at least theorethically, to recover most or all of the
contents of the NTFS partition. So if you did manage to nuke the few
starting sectors of your NTFS partition, do not lose hope just yet -
unless the damage hit a c
>On Sun, 10 Mar 2013 09:33:39 +
>tilmanbregler wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> sudo fdisk -l
>
> Disk /dev/sda: 750.2 GB, 750156374016 bytes
> 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 91201 cylinders, total 1465149168 sectors
> Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
> Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes /
>On Wed, 30 Jan 2013 04:09:37 -0200
>Listeiro 037 wrote:
>
>
> Hi. This is my first message.
>
> How can I verify the signature of tarballs with a RSA key?
>
> flex-2.xx.tar.bz2 in the case, for example.
>
> I haven't found signature files (.asc, .sig) or keys of the
> maintainers in sourcefor
Note that this mail is cross-posted to lfs-support, blfs-support and
lfs-security, with a "Reply-To" set to lfs-security.
This is also the first mail on the lfs-security list in at least three
years. Yaay!
Anyway, the news is from august/september of 2012, so it's a little
stale. However, the sea
>On Thu, 20 Dec 2012 20:25:49 +
>Ken Moffat wrote:
> If you logged in as root, or used 'su' (or 'sudo') then you own the
> system (subject to any restrictions it imposes on you, e.g. sudo
> might be tied down).
More like "subject to restrictions imposed by laws of physics (but not
all, espec
>On Sat, 1 Dec 2012 16:24:08 +0100
>Aleksandar Kuktin wrote:
> I mean `ldd /path/to/bash/that/is/the/problem/bash'.
>
> Also, there is an easy way to test if the problem is linking with a
> library from /tools. Make a symlink.
>
> ln -sv /usr /tools
>
> Then
>On Sat, 1 Dec 2012 16:19:38 +0100
>Aleksandar Kuktin wrote:
>
> >On Sat, 01 Dec 2012 23:59:07 +1300
> >Simon Geard wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 2012-11-30 at 11:17 -0500, Chris Staub wrote:
> > > First, check how Bash is linked: "readelf -l /bin/bash |
>On Sat, 01 Dec 2012 23:59:07 +1300
>Simon Geard wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2012-11-30 at 11:17 -0500, Chris Staub wrote:
> > First, check how Bash is linked: "readelf -l /bin/bash | grep
> > interpret". Of course, this should say that it's looking for the
> > dynamic linker in /lib. Then verify you actu
>On Wed, 28 Nov 2012 16:22:01 +0100
>"Dr.-Ing. Edgar Alwers" wrote:
> You should configure /etc/wpa_supplicant.conf, see wikipedia link
> above. network={
> ssid="mywireless_ssid"
> psk="secretpassphrase"
> # Additional parameters (proto, key_mgmt, etc.)
> proto=WE
WARNING!! FLAMEBAIT!!!
>On Mon, 12 Nov 2012 15:26:08 -0600
>Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Third, if the logs were ascii, the bells and whistles in the link
> above could be accomplished with a bash script fairly easily.
FLAMEBAIT, USE ASBESTOS!
Well, since UNIX and clones have survived all these years
>On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 18:31:31 +0100
>Ken Moffat wrote:
> All distros think they own /boot : this will make updating kernels
> fun if more than one distro (or LFS+distro) is involved.
Not only that, but most believe they also own the master boot record.
Some are even very proactive in repartition
> checking dynamic linker characteristics... configure: error: Link tests are
> not allowed after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES.
> make[2]: *** [configure-stage1-target-libstdc++-v3] Error 1
> make[2]: Leaving directory `/mnt/lfs/sources/gcc-build'
> make[1]: *** [stage1-bubble] Error 2
> make[1]: Leaving di
>On Wed, 05 Sep 2012 07:41:20 +0100
>Jasmine Iwanek wrote:
>
> On 2012-09-05 07:13, Oshadha Gunawardena wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I am wondering if there are any female LFS hackers out there :P.
> > This is just to get an idea about the community, please ignore if
> > this message is irrelevant
>
>On Mon, 20 Aug 2012 17:33:08 +0530
>Oshadha Gunawardena wrote:
>
> Tried that, and I managed to configure it (trace -
> http://tny.cz/5f221035). But came out with a new error please refer
> the below trace
>
> configure: error: The pkg-config script could not be found or is too
> old. Make
>On Fri, 20 Jul 2012 23:10:25 +0100
>Ken Moffat wrote:
> Personally, I would never trust a BIOS writer to do things
> correctly, nor a manufacturer of affordable motherboards to do
> things straightforwardly - on one of my current boxes, the connector
> where I happened to connect the DVD drive
>On Sat, 12 May 2012 21:11:19 +0430
>Yasser Zamani wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> Sorry if it's off-topic; do you know why 2 CPUs act like a mirror
> while I'm running "make -k check" for testing GCC-4.6.2 (6.17's
> section of LFS-7.1)? it's not a problem but just I would like to
> know; I've attached an
>On Sat, 5 May 2012 09:43:28 -0700 (PDT)
>Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
>
> On 05-05-2012 12:20, Yasser Zamani wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > One more thing; sometimes I know why to run the script but I don't
> > know how script works exactly. the main example is sed. I know it
> > edits streams to replac
>On Sun, 11 Mar 2012 14:45:02 -0700
>Martins Gulbis wrote:
>
> Well, I bought and installed a new mouse. NO CHANGE. One interesting
> thing that I did notice though is that the disconnects/re-connects
> occur almost exactly every 60 seconds. I am not sure what to make of
> that. I am hoping tha
>On Mon, 06 Feb 2012 22:28:25 -0500
>Alain Toussaint wrote:
>
> Hello everyone,
> I still haven't done chapter 6 of the book but in
> preparation, I tried to test a git kernel (v3.3.0-rc2) along with the
> git sources of the nouveau driver for my nvidia card according to the
> instructions t
>On Mon, 07 Nov 2011 07:26:03 +1100
>Luke Ceddia wrote:
>
> Hi all,
> I just started building the packages in chapter 6 when I discovered
> and interesting problem. The perl binary exists in the /tools/bin
> directory, I can view it with 'ls' and print it with 'cat'. Outside
> the chroot environme
>On Fri, 04 Nov 2011 13:44:19 -0400 (EDT)
>Danny Vukobratovich wrote:
> I am getting this error:
>
> configure: error: cannot run C compiled programs.
> If you mean to cross configure, use '--host'.
>
> Does any one have any insight into how I can fix this? I am working
> on a 64-bit system.
Newsflash: kernel.org is back online. Repositories are available.
--
Fourth law of programming:
Anything that can go wrong wi
sendmail: segmentation violation - core dumped
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubsc
who does it.
Have you considered Damn Small Linux, or Puppy Linux or PLD?
--
-Aleksandar Kuktin
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
em, in the "wrong"
place.
To wit, if you build the toolchain minisystem, chroot, then build the
system glibc in /{,usr}, you will have no problems. But, if you try to
build it in some other place: /some-other-place, the process will fail.
If you did stuff by the book, make sure to see if you pr
. One is build and installed by
the main commands. You should be fine with only it. If you need the
other, then you issue these commands. And after you do, you're done
with it. Then you have two sets of Ncurses libraries. You can go on
with the build.
--
-Aleksandar Kuktin
--
http://linu
h ]
I just wrote ''[ blah ]'' inline. Remove the quotes (luckily
they enclose empty strings so even if you don't remove them, they
should not change the meaning of the expression).
--
-Aleksandar Kuktin
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
$package` substitutions.
If ${package} has a space in it, that could break it.
You can fix this by doing ''[ -e "${logdir}/make-${package}.log" ]''.
Take a small package (gzip?), and build it in such a way that it breaks
at various points, then inspect the relevant dire
Errors like following:
>...
>
> [errors]
>
>With Best Regards.
>Harry Wei.
>
You are probably using a host system toolchain. Make sure you have
properly set your PATH environment variable. And generally double-check
your steps so far.
Switching to a newer version of LFS wo
stem to create the program and test that it compiles
Well.. there is always the school of thought which considers a humble
'cat' to be a reasonable and usable "text inputer". :)
Something along the lines of
cat > my_cool_program.c
#include
main() {
printf("Hello
BTW, if I recall correctly, the line is printed by Bash, so you should
look there.
--
-Aleksandar Kuktin
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
ssages until I'm presented with the login prompt.
>
> Any ideas on how to debug this would be appreciated. Thanks.
Do the scripts run in the proper virtual terminal?
--
-Aleksandar Kuktin
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
and try building them with the
2-hours-in-the-past chroot time (however, in reality, 10h UTC and 12h
CEST are one and the same time, but filesystem does not account for
timegroups).
It is simple to check this: ls -l $GLIBC_SOURCE_DIR, and see the times.
If it holds true (sources have timestamps t
aps the timestamping of you files is
broke? So that Make keeps thinking source files are newer that object
files.
How exactly did you enter chroot?
--
-Aleksandar Kuktin
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
ms Cwd.pm is missing.
In a vanilla Perl source directory, it is in
${perl_srcdir}/cpan/Cwd/Cwd.pm
Perhaps Configure didn't do its job?
I only now saw the new instructions. Until now, I've been using
ancient 6.2 (and still am). It recommended running ./configure.gnu so
maybe you can tr
so have 'x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu' directory, and it seems gcc
> tries to use its tools on pass 2, thus giving me the error. Any help
> is appreciated.
>
> Thanks in advance.
You need to use CLFS.
In this listing, the top (preceding command) is missing so I can only
spec
>On Mon, 21 Jun 2010 11:21:27 -0500 (CDT)
>al...@verizon.net wrote:
>
> Jun 21, 2010 10:52:35 AM, lfs-support@linuxfromscratch.org wrote:
>
> On my 'make menuconfig'
> "Device Drivers>Graphics support>
> [*] Support for frame buffer devices" screen
> this is all I have:
>
> --- Support for frame
>On Sun, 20 Jun 2010 11:21:38 +0100
>Andrew Benton wrote:
> > 2. I'm willing to work with a "nouveau" specialist to
> > help them solve this problem if anybody is interested.
> >
>
> Can we see your kernel config? Could you put it up somewhere like
> pastebin and post a link so we can see please
>On Wed, 16 Jun 2010 17:34:34 +0800
>Parmenides wrote:
>
> Hi,
>When system starting, there are two settings, namely 'regional
> settings' and 'edit settings',
> at which the process of starting will pause and I have to press enter
> key twice to finish them.
> Is there any configurations by w
>On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 13:16:24 -0500
>Mike McCarty wrote:
>
> Use a red colored prompt when running with root authorization.
>
> Hope you keep learning for a long time.
>
> Mike
See, this is a good point. :)
I should fix this on my system.
-AKuktin
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listi
>On Tue, 01 Jun 2010 19:21:10 +0200
>Tobias Vogel wrote:
>
> hi,
>
> thanks for your quick reply. i checked the fonts-paths and could not
> find anything odd about it, neither did the xorg.0.log complain about
> anything in combination with fonts.
> i ended up in reinstalling freetype2 and font
>On Fri, 14 May 2010 22:20:32 +0100
>Ken Moffat wrote:
>
> On 14 May 2010 20:03, Prashant R Keshvani (Baijoo)
> wrote:
> > Hi, I have faced the same problem. I have used kvm to build LFS,
> > when I ran configure from GMP, it generate an error saying no
> > suitable compiler found for pentium2-un
>On Tue, 11 May 2010 08:01:26 -0600
>Yan Mo wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> > >
> > > checking cpuid.h usability... no
> > > checking cpuid.h presence... no
> > > checking for cpuid.h... no
> > > configure: error: gcc must provide the header
> > >
> >
> > The file cpuid.h is provided by gcc. Since you d
>On Fri, 02 Apr 2010 07:26:59 -0400
>mas...@mail.com wrote:
>
>
> Hi i am using the LFS 6.6 book to build my LFS, but now im kinda
> stuck.
>
> I have compiled GCC but when i run the tests i get this:
>
> make: *** [do-check] Error 2
> make: Target `check´ not remade because of errors.
>
> The
>On Fri, 19 Mar 2010 14:21:29 -0600
>Mike McCarty wrote:
>
> Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> > Chris Staub wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> >> I do not get any kind of error message when just using "tar -tf"
> >> by itself, only when piping through "head". Also, I tried piping
> >> through various other programs (grep
>On Sat, 13 Mar 2010 14:02:41 +0530
>"Sathya Narayana.R" wrote:
>
> Hello,
> I finished my LFS 6.5 along with "package user" system. After
> completing the installation of grub and everything, i booted into the
> new system.
>
> It shows the following errors...
>
>
> /sysmount: only root can do
>On Fri, 12 Feb 2010 05:22:24 -0800
>"Kyle Rush" wrote:
>
> On Fri, February 12, 2010 5:15 am, Andrew Benton wrote:
> > On 12/02/10 12:14, Kyle Rush wrote:
> >>
> >> I have a livecd 6.3 and book 6.3. the computer I am installing it
> >> on is somewhat old, and thus 1 SBU = about one hour. I can't
>On Mon, 1 Feb 2010 10:42:51 -0800 (PST)
>brown wrap wrote:
>
>
> When I run configure it says critical programs are too old or
> missing. I am logged into that window as user lfs. I looked at the
> environament and compared it to root's env and the paths looks the
> same. But if I run configure
>On Thu, 3 Dec 2009 03:44:43 -0500
>stosss wrote:
>
> I started over from scratch. I have captured log files of everything.
> I ran tests on everything and captured all those tests. Everything was
> going along nicely.
>
> In chapter 6.4 I used:
>
> chroot "$LFS" /tools/bin/env -i \
> HOME=/
>On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 16:02:12 -0500
>linux fan wrote:
>
> Segmentation fault occurs right after stripping in chapter05.
>
> I am building lfs trunk using jhalfs trunk.
>
> The stripping step succeeds, but the next step which is to
> restore-luser-env errors. The restore-luser-env step only has t
>On Mon, 16 Nov 2009 03:32:03 -0500
>Chris Staub wrote:
>
> On 11/14/2009 04:54 PM, Aleksandar Kuktin wrote:
> > First off, I understand that in newer versions of LFS book, the
> > build process changed, so that GCC and binutils are built together.
> > I stil
>On Sat, 14 Nov 2009 22:54:49 +0100
>Aleksandar Kuktin wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> If you opt for a 64-bit only, however, the stock LFS commands should
> do the trick (I myself use ones from CLFS-1.0.0-x86_64-64, adapted
> for my versions of packages/patches).
>
>
was 32-bit.
> 3) The lsflivecd (x86_64) site mentions an unofficial
> version of the, I suppose, 64-bit version book, that I hope would
> contain some pointers for me to start with, but neither could I find
> it in the mounted CD iso image nor on the webpages. Is such thing
> really avai
76 matches
Mail list logo
