lfs-support.neophyte_...@ordinaryamerican.net wrote:
> I've started trying to use LFS 7.4.
>
> As usual with these things, I took a tangent and went looking for Internet
> references outside of www.LinuxFromScratch.org.
>
> Does anyone within the LFS project maintain The Linux Documentation Project
I've started trying to use LFS 7.4.
As usual with these things, I took a tangent and went looking for Internet
references outside of www.LinuxFromScratch.org.
Does anyone within the LFS project maintain The Linux Documentation Project
LFS Guide, http://www.tldp.org/guides.html#lfs or is that done
On 11/29/2013 07:23 PM, Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 11:35:19AM -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> Baho Utot wrote:
>>> Is it possible to build LFS-7.4 on x86_64 without the /lib64 symlink?
>>>
>>> I have tried to do so but libstd++ in the chapter 5 tool chain dies.
>>>
>>> I would like t
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 11:35:19AM -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Baho Utot wrote:
> > Is it possible to build LFS-7.4 on x86_64 without the /lib64 symlink?
> >
> > I have tried to do so but libstd++ in the chapter 5 tool chain dies.
> >
> > I would like to build for x86_64 and have the same filesyste
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 10:55 AM, wrote:
> On 2013-11-29 18:26, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>
> alex@xfsmail.comwrote:
>
> My real point is this one. Bash-3.2 (/bin/sh should be a symbolic or hard
> link to bash) I think maybe it means /bin/sh should be /bin/bash ( /bin/sh
> -> /bin/bash) but mine is ( /
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 10:56 AM, frozen tuesday
wrote:
> Hello all --
>
> Thanks to the help I have received here or elsewhere, I have made it as
> far as section III in the online instructions: "Building the LFS System".
>
> I am using Linux Mint 15 as my host computer which only allows me to
>
Hello,
On Ubuntu and Mint, I found out that if you run:
sudo passwd root
And set the password, you can run "su - root" and login as root. I do this
as one of the first things when setting up a Ubuntu or Mint system because
I cannot stand sudo.
Hope this helps!
Douglas Reno
--
http://linuxfrom
On 11/29/2013 01:56 PM, frozen tuesday wrote:
> Hello all --
>
> Thanks to the help I have received here or elsewhere, I have made it as
> far as section III in the online instructions: "Building the LFS System".
>
> I am using Linux Mint 15 as my host computer which only allows me to
> "sudo" befo
Hello all --
Thanks to the help I have received here or elsewhere, I have made it as far
as section III in the online instructions: "Building the LFS System".
I am using Linux Mint 15 as my host computer which only allows me to "sudo"
before commands. I cannot log in as root (to my knowledge). Th
On 2013-11-29 18:26, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> alex@xfsmail.comwrote:
>
>> My real point is this one. Bash-3.2 (/bin/sh should be a symbolic or
hard link to bash) I think maybe it means /bin/sh should be /bin/bash (
/bin/sh -> /bin/bash) but mine is ( /bin/sh -> /usr/bin/bash ). (
/bin/sh -> /bin/
On 2013-11-29 17:59, lf...@cruziero.com wrote:
> Your binutils
version is later than the max-recommended in the book's
>
host-sys-requirements ('7.4/prologue/hostreqs.html'):
> "Binutils-2.17
(Versions greater than 2.23.2 are not recommended as they have
> not
been tested)"
>
> However, we
a...@xfsmail.com wrote:
> My real point is this one.
> Bash-3.2 (/bin/sh should be a symbolic or hard link
> to bash) I think maybe it means /bin/sh should be /bin/bash ( /bin/sh ->
> /bin/bash) but mine is ( /bin/sh -> /usr/bin/bash ).
> ( /bin/sh -> /bin/bash ) = ( /bin/sh -> /usr/bin/bash ) are
On 2013-11-29 17:52, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> alex@xfsmail.comwrote:
>
>> Hi all, I'm still new for LFS, I'm going too try it. I'm with Mageia
3 and this is on the host bash, version
4.2.37(2)-release /bin/sh -> /usr/bin/bash Binutils: (Linux/GNU
Binutils) 2.23.51.0.8.201
Em 29-11-2013 14:52, Bruce Dubbs escreveu:
> a...@xfsmail.com wrote:
>>
>>
>> Hi all, I'm still new for LFS, I'm going too try it.
>>
>> I'm with
>> Mageia 3 and this is on the host
>>
>>
>>
>> bash,
>> version 4.2.37(2)-release
>> /bin/sh -> /usr/bin/bash
>> Binutils: (Lin
> Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2013 17:47:23 +
> From: a...@xfsmail.com
> To:
> Subject: [lfs-support] Host System Requirements LFS 7.4 with Mageia 3
>
> Hi all, I'm still new for LFS, I'm going too try it.
>
> I'm with
> Mageia 3 and this is on the host
>
>
>
> bash,
> versio
> Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2013 17:47:23 +
> From: a...@xfsmail.com
> To:
> Subject: [lfs-support] Host System Requirements LFS 7.4 with Mageia 3
>
> Hi all, I'm still new for LFS, I'm going too try it.
>
> I'm with
> Mageia 3 and this is on the host
>
>
>
> bash,
> versio
a...@xfsmail.com wrote:
>
>
> Hi all, I'm still new for LFS, I'm going too try it.
>
> I'm with
> Mageia 3 and this is on the host
>
>
>
> bash,
> version 4.2.37(2)-release
> /bin/sh -> /usr/bin/bash
> Binutils: (Linux/GNU
> Binutils) 2.23.51.0.8.20121218
> bison (GNU Bison
Hello
Le 29/11/2013 18:47, a...@xfsmail.com a écrit :
> version-check.sh: line 29: make: command not found
I think that the make command must be install.
So your Mageia is not ready for LFS 7.4, and you ? are you ready to read
the book and your screen ?
Bye
Denis
--
http://linuxfromscratch.or
Hi all, I'm still new for LFS, I'm going too try it.
I'm with
Mageia 3 and this is on the host
bash,
version 4.2.37(2)-release
/bin/sh -> /usr/bin/bash
Binutils: (Linux/GNU
Binutils) 2.23.51.0.8.20121218
bison (GNU Bison) 2.7
/usr/bin/yacc ->
/usr/bin/yacc.bison
bz
Baho Utot wrote:
> Is it possible to build LFS-7.4 on x86_64 without the /lib64 symlink?
>
> I have tried to do so but libstd++ in the chapter 5 tool chain dies.
>
> I would like to build for x86_64 and have the same filesystem layout
> that i686 has ie without the lib64 directories
I really don't
Is it possible to build LFS-7.4 on x86_64 without the /lib64 symlink?
I have tried to do so but libstd++ in the chapter 5 tool chain dies.
I would like to build for x86_64 and have the same filesystem layout
that i686 has ie without the lib64 directories
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman
> From: Simon Geard
> To: lfs-support@linuxfromscratch.org
> Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2013 21:23:05 +1300
> Subject: Re: [lfs-support] Ethernet Card Not Found
>
> On Thu, 2013-11-28 at 10:28 +, akhiezer wrote:
> > You're expending resources to try to persuade people that there's no issue
> > here.
>
On Thu, 2013-11-28 at 10:28 +, akhiezer wrote:
> You're expending resources to try to persuade people that there's no issue
> here.
I'm not trying to persuade anyone anything... I'm trying to understand
why this is considered such an important thing, why it comes up again
and again as a sourc
23 matches
Mail list logo
