a...@xfsmail.com wrote: > My real point is this one. > Bash-3.2 (/bin/sh should be a symbolic or hard link > to bash) I think maybe it means /bin/sh should be /bin/bash ( /bin/sh -> > /bin/bash) but mine is ( /bin/sh -> /usr/bin/bash ). > ( /bin/sh -> /bin/bash ) = ( /bin/sh -> /usr/bin/bash ) are they same?
The normal place for bash is /bin because in the case of a separate /usr partition it will not be available. A separate /usr partition is very rare because disk drives are quite large and is not needed. What you have should work fine with regards to bash. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page