2010/11/16 littlebat :
> On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 04:13:23 +0300
> Flan Alflani wrote:
>
>>
>> is this something i should worry about or it just simple expected
>> (ignored) failure in the posix/annexc test on 6.9. Glibc-2.12.1?
>>
>> root:/sources/glibc-build# grep Error glibc-check-log
>> make[2]: [/
Thanks for replying. I am really glad someone has replied.
My Gcc tar ball is gcc-4.5.1.tar.bz2, i used 'tar -jxf gcc-4.5.1.tar.bz2', to
extract it.And, I have made sure that mpc, gmp, mpfr are extracted in the
gcc-4.5.1 source folder and not in gcc-build folder. If it was messed up it
would sho
On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 04:13:23 +0300
Flan Alflani wrote:
>
> is this something i should worry about or it just simple expected
> (ignored) failure in the posix/annexc test on 6.9. Glibc-2.12.1?
>
> root:/sources/glibc-build# grep Error glibc-check-log
> make[2]: [/sources/glibc-build/posix/annexc
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 11:54:06PM +, Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 06:44:31PM -0500, Mike Hollis wrote:
> > The LatArCyrHeb-16 has less missing glyphs than the default and I like
> > it better than some others I tried. The arrow glyphs at the top of the
> > lynx browser are mis
2010/11/12 littlebat :
> On Fri, 12 Nov 2010 00:34:31 +0300
> Flan Alflani wrote:
>
>> 2010/11/11 littlebat :
>> > On Wed, 10 Nov 2010 16:31:50 +
>> > dgfhfgh dfghdfgh wrote:
>> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Sincerely,
>> >>
>> >> http://www.Q8h.net
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> > Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2010
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 06:44:31PM -0500, Mike Hollis wrote:
> The LatArCyrHeb-16 has less missing glyphs than the default and I like
> it better than some others I tried. The arrow glyphs at the top of the
> lynx browser are missing,however.
that's the one with the "soviet-style" cyrillic glyp
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 10:51:49PM +, Andrew Benton wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Nov 2010 17:24:10 +
> Ken Moffat wrote:
>
> > The problem with x264 is that it's always a snapshot. For people
> > using today's ffmpeg snapshot, today's x264 probably works. For
> > people using a released version
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 05:10:46PM +, David Shaw wrote:
> Stupid question time.
>
> What font would be appropriate for a British set up? I cannot make head
> nor tail of the options available.
>
> At least the keymap is nice and easy to work out :-)
>
> Many thanks,
>
> David Shaw
> --
gnu2007-...@yahoo.co.in wrote:
> I am still stuck at this chapter, I tried by adding -std=c99 while
> configure; and also, by adding to the makefile using vi. But, its not
> getting fixed.Can anyone please suggest any way to fix this?.
It's not clear that you followed the directions:
tar -xf gcc.
Ken Moffat wrote these words on 11/15/10 15:09 CST:
> On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 02:17:08PM -0600, Randy McMurchy wrote:
>> William Immendorf wrote these words on 11/15/10 13:21 CST:
>>
>>> Well, I personally think that x264 should go into the book mainly
>>> because if the book says that a dep is req
I am still stuck at this chapter, I tried by adding -std=c99 while configure;
and also, by adding to the makefile using vi. But, its not getting fixed.Can
anyone please suggest any way to fix this?.
--- On Sun, 14/11/10, gnu2007-...@yahoo.co.in wrote:
From: gnu2007-...@yahoo.co.in
Subject: 5.5
William Immendorf wrote these words on 11/15/10 13:21 CST:
> Well, I personally think that x264 should go into the book mainly
> because if the book says that a dep is required or recommended, it has
> to be in the book.
Yes, this is typically the policy. Which package recommends x264?
> This i
Ken,
Many thanks for your very prompt and informative reply.
On 15/11/10 17:49, Ken Moffat wrote:
> Try them. I've no idea how your screen is set up, but *for just
> english* lat1-16.psfu.gz (so "lat1-16") is probably an adequate
> place to begin.
As this is my first serious attempt at an LFS b
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 05:10:46PM +, David Shaw wrote:
> Stupid question time.
>
> What font would be appropriate for a British set up? I cannot make head
> nor tail of the options available.
>
Try them. I've no idea how your screen is set up, but *for just
english* lat1-16.psfu.gz (so
Ken Moffat wrote these words on 11/15/10 11:24 CST:
> The problem with x264 is that it's always a snapshot. For people
> using today's ffmpeg snapshot, today's x264 probably works. For
> people using a released version of ffmpeg, who knows. That's why
> I've mentioned a specific "known to work"
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 10:56:13AM -0600, Randy McMurchy wrote:
> William Immendorf wrote these words on 11/15/10 10:43 CST:
> > On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 5:10 AM, Allard Welter
> > wrote:
> >> x264 wants yasm. I linked nasm to asm which compiles ok, I haven't got
> >> round to checking if it works
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 10:47:18AM -0600, Randy McMurchy wrote:
> Ken Moffat wrote these words on 11/15/10 10:36 CST:
> > You still build without one or other variant of which ? Thanks for
> > the report, it's such a basic part of the stack for most of us that
> > it's hard to find what needs it.
Stupid question time.
What font would be appropriate for a British set up? I cannot make head
nor tail of the options available.
At least the keymap is nice and easy to work out :-)
Many thanks,
David Shaw
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfrom
18 matches
Mail list logo
