On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 10:56:13AM -0600, Randy McMurchy wrote: > William Immendorf wrote these words on 11/15/10 10:43 CST: > > On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 5:10 AM, Allard Welter <allard.wel...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > >> x264 wants yasm. I linked nasm to asm which compiles ok, I haven't got > >> round to checking if it works yet. > > This is why YASM should go into the book, > > As best as I can tell, x264 is still a Non-BLFS package. We don't install > packages to support other packages that are not in the book. Of course, > if someone were to send in a patch to add a reputable package to the book, > we would certainly look at it! > The problem with x264 is that it's always a snapshot. For people using today's ffmpeg snapshot, today's x264 probably works. For people using a released version of ffmpeg, who knows. That's why I've mentioned a specific "known to work" snapshot of x264 o nthe ffmpeg page.
ĸen -- das eine Mal als Tragödie, das andere Mal als Farce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
