2010/11/12 littlebat <dashing.m...@gmail.com>: > On Fri, 12 Nov 2010 00:34:31 +0300 > Flan Alflani <falfl...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> 2010/11/11 littlebat <dashing.m...@gmail.com>: >> > On Wed, 10 Nov 2010 16:31:50 +0000 >> > dgfhfgh dfghdfgh <solo9...@hotmail.com> wrote: >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Sincerely, >> >> >> >> http://www.Q8h.net >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2010 23:04:33 +0800 >> >> > From: dashing.m...@gmail.com >> >> > To: lfs-support@linuxfromscratch.org >> >> > Subject: Re: Problem Booting up the new system ? >> >> > >> >> > On Tue, 9 Nov 2010 12:04:05 +0000 >> >> > dgfhfgh dfghdfgh <solo9...@hotmail.com> wrote: >> >> > >> >> > > >> >> > > Hello all, >> >> > > after going thought the book and try to boot the new system, >> >> > > the Bootloader work fine but when i try to boot the root >> >> > > filesystem my screen display alot of color (attached photo) >> >> > > without any message or anything. I try to do the book again >> >> > > it seem to be compiling ok without anything i could find. dont >> >> > > know what i did wrong and or what to do next, therefore, if >> >> > > anyone could help or point me to the right direction. thxbook >> >> > > SVN-20101027host lfcliveCD >> >> > >> >> > Maybe, you can attach your .config file to the list, so someone >> >> > can test it on their machine. >> >> > >> >> > Maybe, you can copy your LFS root directory to another machine to >> >> > test if it is only happen on that machine. >> >> > >> >> > -- >> >> > littlebat >> >> > -- >> >> > http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support >> >> > FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html >> >> > Unsubscribe: See the above information page >> >> >> >> sorry forget to add the attachment :) here is a link >> >> http://linuxfromscratch.pastebin.com/mxmgFkV8 >> >> >> > >> > I tested your .config on my LFS6.6 system, I didn't change anything >> > else except my system is vmware i386 machine, so the kernel config >> > program changed some things automatically, see the "diff" result >> > between the modified .config and yours: >> > http://linuxfromscratch.pastebin.com/DLuCd850 >> > >> > Boot from the new compiled kernel, no any exception happened. After >> > compiled the vmware disk driver(Fusion MPT device support) into >> > kernel, I can boot and login into system with this kernel without >> > error. >> > >> > So, I think maybe your hardware need some special kernel configs or >> > your hardware has run into some new kernel bugs. I think. >> > >> > Good luck. >> > >> > littlebat >> > -- >> > 开源文化实验室 http://www.learndiary.com/ >> > 孟大兴网站 http://www.openlong.com/ >> > -- >> > http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support >> > FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html >> > Unsubscribe: See the above information page >> > >> >> >> littlebat, >> >> thx for looking into my problem, However i have a question on chapter >> 6.16. GCC-4.5.1 about the test suite results ? >> >> Is this ok : >> >> >> ../gcc-4.5.1/contrib/test_summary >> cat <<'EOF' | >> LAST_UPDATED: Obtained from SVN: tags/gcc_4_5_1_release revision >> 162774 >> >> Native configuration is x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu >> >> === gcc tests === >> >> >> Running target unix >> FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/limits-exprparen.c -O0 (test for excess >> errors) FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/limits-exprparen.c -O1 (test >> for excess errors) FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/limits-exprparen.c >> -O2 (test for excess errors) FAIL: >> gcc.c-torture/compile/limits-exprparen.c -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer >> (test for excess errors) FAIL: >> gcc.c-torture/compile/limits-exprparen.c -O3 -g (test for excess >> errors) FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/limits-exprparen.c -Os (test >> for excess errors) >> >> === gcc Summary === >> >> # of expected passes 61316 >> # of unexpected failures 6 >> # of expected failures 165 >> # of unsupported tests 833 >> /sources/gcc-build/gcc/xgcc version 4.5.1 (GCC) >> >> === libgomp tests === >> >> >> Running target unix >> >> === libgomp Summary === >> >> # of expected passes 1029 >> === libmudflap tests === >> >> >> Running target unix >> FAIL: libmudflap.c/pass46-frag.c (-O2) (test for excess errors) >> FAIL: libmudflap.c/pass46-frag.c (-O2) (test for excess errors) >> FAIL: libmudflap.c/fail31-frag.c (-O3) output pattern test >> FAIL: libmudflap.c/pass45-frag.c (-O3) execution test >> FAIL: libmudflap.c/pass45-frag.c (-O3) output pattern test >> FAIL: libmudflap.c/pass45-frag.c (-O3) execution test >> FAIL: libmudflap.c/pass45-frag.c (-O3) output pattern test >> FAIL: libmudflap.c/pass46-frag.c (-O3) (test for excess errors) >> FAIL: libmudflap.c/pass46-frag.c (-O3) (test for excess errors) >> FAIL: libmudflap.c++/pass41-frag.cxx execution test >> FAIL: libmudflap.c++/pass41-frag.cxx ( -O) execution test >> FAIL: libmudflap.c++/pass41-frag.cxx (-O2) execution test >> FAIL: libmudflap.c++/pass41-frag.cxx (-O3) execution test >> >> === libmudflap Summary === >> >> # of expected passes 1414 >> # of unexpected failures 13 >> === libstdc++ tests === >> >> >> Running target unix >> >> === libstdc++ Summary === >> >> # of expected passes 7071 >> # of expected failures 95 >> # of unsupported tests 339 >> >> Compiler version: 4.5.1 (GCC) >> Platform: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu >> configure flags: --prefix=/usr --libexecdir=/usr/lib --enable-shared >> --enable-threads=posix --enable-__cxa_atexit --enable-clocale=gnu >> --enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-multilib --disable-bootstrap >> --with-system-zlib >> EOF >> Mail -s "Results for 4.5.1 (GCC) testsuite on >> x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu" gcc-testresu...@gcc.gnu.org && >> mv /sources/gcc-build/./gcc/testsuite/gcc/gcc.sum >> /sources/gcc-build/./gcc/testsuite/gcc/gcc.sum.sent && >> mv >> /sources/gcc-build/./x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.sum >> /sources/gcc-build/./x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.sum.sent >> && >> mv >> /sources/gcc-build/./x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/libmudflap/testsuite/libmudflap.sum >> /sources/gcc-build/./x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/libmudflap/testsuite/libmudflap.sum.sent >> && >> mv /sources/gcc-build/./x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/libstdc+ >> +-v3/testsuite/libstdc+ >> +.sum /sources/gcc-build/./x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/libstdc+ >> +-v3/testsuite/libstdc++.sum.sent && >> mv /sources/gcc-build/./gcc/testsuite/gcc/gcc.log >> /sources/gcc-build/./gcc/testsuite/gcc/gcc.log.sent >> && >> mv >> /sources/gcc-build/./x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.log >> /sources/gcc-build/./x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.log.sent >> && >> mv >> /sources/gcc-build/./x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/libmudflap/testsuite/libmudflap.log >> /sources/gcc-build/./x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/libmudflap/testsuite/libmudflap.log.sent >> && >> mv /sources/gcc-build/./x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/libstdc+ >> +-v3/testsuite/libstdc+ >> +.log /sources/gcc-build/./x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/libstdc+ >> +-v3/testsuite/libstdc++.log.sent && true >> -- >> http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support >> FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html >> Unsubscribe: See the above information page > > How about your interesting boot screen? > > Gcc testing result is too complex to analyze for me. The results can be > different in different environments. For example, the results is > different when I set "MAKEFLAGS=-j 2" compare to don't set > "MAKEFLAGS=-j 2", and the result in my 32 bit system is also different > compare to > http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/build-logs/6.6/core2duo/test-logs/076-gcc > . > So after some simple studies on my Gcc test result, I just omited these > test FAILs when I build my first LFS6.6 :-) > > -- > 开源文化实验室 http://www.learndiary.com/ > 孟大兴网站 http://www.openlong.com/ > -- > http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support > FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html > Unsubscribe: See the above information page >
is this something i should worry about or it just simple expected (ignored) failure in the posix/annexc test on 6.9. Glibc-2.12.1? root:/sources/glibc-build# grep Error glibc-check-log make[2]: [/sources/glibc-build/posix/annexc.out] Error 1 (ignored) make[2]: *** [/sources/glibc-build/nptl/tst-rwlock6.out] Error 1 make[2]: *** [/sources/glibc-build/nptl/tst-rwlock7.out] Error 1 make[2]: *** [/sources/glibc-build/nptl/tst-rwlock9.out] Error 1 make[2]: *** [/sources/glibc-build/nptl/tst-rwlock11.out] Error 1 make[2]: *** [/sources/glibc-build/nptl/tst-rwlock12.out] Error 11 make[2]: *** [/sources/glibc-build/nptl/tst-rwlock14.out] Error 1 make[1]: *** [nptl/tests] Error 2 make[2]: *** [/sources/glibc-build/rt/tst-cpuclock1.out] Error 1 make[1]: *** [rt/tests] Error 2 make[2]: *** [/sources/glibc-build/elf/tst-xmmymm.out] Error 1 make[1]: *** [elf/tests] Error 2 make: *** [check] Error 2 -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
