>> Why mess around with any patches at all? Or am I not getting the>>
drift of your messages?>>If you don't have broadband or don't want to
contribute to stressing the>servers, downloading kernel patches can be an
attractive option. Instead>of dowloading 40MB you only download a few
kB.The best I c
Hi.I have an LFS running. It's version 6.1.1. I'm quite happy with it, but I have a couple of issues. For example, I'd like to update glibc and add some locales (utf-8), install gcc-4 and a new udev. So, as LFS-6.2
has (will have, it's the same) all these things, I was thinking about updating the
On Fri, Jul 21, 2006 at 08:08:36AM -0700, Paul G Rogers wrote:
> Sorry, thought [2.6.] was understood. IIRC the full name is
> patch-2.6.12-tar.bz2 from kernel.org, of course.
That's the diff between 2.6.11 and 2.6.12 . Not want you want,
surely?
Regards,
Jeremy Henty
--
http://linuxfroms
* Randy McMurchy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-07-21 12:46]:
> Paul G Rogers wrote these words on 07/20/06 21:38 CST:
> > I've just installed 2.6.11.12 with LFS-6.1.1. I want to bring the kernel
> > current. I thought patch-12 would be approproate but it had many rejects
> > and I saw a few "reversed
Paul G Rogers wrote these words on 07/20/06 21:38 CST:
> I've just installed 2.6.11.12 with LFS-6.1.1. I want to bring the kernel
> current. I thought patch-12 would be approproate but it had many rejects
> and I saw a few "reversed or already applied" fly by. What's the
> appropriate path to pa
>I am not sure what you mean by "patch-12". What exactly is that?
Sorry, thought [2.6.] was understood. IIRC the full name is
patch-2.6.12-tar.bz2 from kernel.org, of course.
Paul Rogers ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
http://www.xprt.net/~pgrogers/
http://www.geocities.com/paulgrogers/
Rogers' Second Law
The book recommends building the first kernel without modules, which
seems sensible. I made sure by disabling module support, which may have
contributed to some of the glitches I'm reporting. Other than my
"multiple sessions", I followed the book quite closely (cut & paste).
I'm just beginning t
On 7/20/06, Kevin Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
For the record I am using the LFS LiveCD 6.1.1-4 via VMware and book
version 6.1.1
[snip]
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/20001226- 1.c -Os (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.c-torture /execute/va-arg-25.c execution, -Os
Two failures isn't t
