Re: Kernel 2.6 - SATA hd

2005-12-03 Thread Justin R. Knierim
Ross wrote: Booted using the LFS LiveCD ran lsmod | less sd_mod wasnt there. Tried modprobe sd_mod and got FATAL:Module sd_mod not found. Which LiveCD version are you using? Of course the module loading won't work, SATA support is compiled into the kernel. Grepping I see: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: annexc.out - ignoring error

2005-12-03 Thread Ken Moffat
On Sat, 3 Dec 2005, Jeremy Henty wrote: I'm in Chapter 6.11.1 and the glibc test script gives me: make[2]: [/sources/glibc-build/posix/annexc.out] Error 1 (ignored) This was mentioned before on this list by John Green[1], but no-one replied and he didn't follow-up to say if he completed LFS su

Re: Kernel 2.6 - SATA hd

2005-12-03 Thread Ross
slax would seem to be a dumb choice, it doesnt have gcc installed! oh well now I am downloading knoppix4.0.2 hopefully I will proceed better with this! On Sat, 2005-12-03 at 15:04 +, Ross wrote: > Ok, when I get to a stage to build the kernel I will make sure I build > the required stuff dire

annexc.out - ignoring error

2005-12-03 Thread Jeremy Henty
This is another report on issues arising from building LFS 6.1.1 from the Knoppix 3.7 Live CD. Is anyone else using this as a host? If so, are you seeing this? I'm in Chapter 6.11.1 and the glibc test script gives me: make[2]: [/sources/glibc-build/posix/annexc.out] Error 1 (ignored) This w

Re: Kernel 2.6 - SATA hd

2005-12-03 Thread Subhash Chandra
> On Sat, 2005-12-03 at 12:43 +, Ross wrote: > >I have just bought a new Dell dimension 3100 which had a SATA harddrive. >I wanted to follow the LFS book using the LiveCD but it wouldnt >recognise the HD. Hi, I had a similar problem. I use raid. It's kind of chicken and egg prob. You probably

Re: Kernel 2.6 - SATA hd

2005-12-03 Thread Ross
Ok, when I get to a stage to build the kernel I will make sure I build the required stuff directly into it. However at this stage I am trying to get the livecd to see the hd. Any ideas? If this isn't possible I will attempt the LFS build using the SLAX livecd which gives me a distro base to work fr

Re: Kernel 2.6 - SATA hd

2005-12-03 Thread Ross
Booted using the LFS LiveCD ran lsmod | less sd_mod wasnt there. Tried modprobe sd_mod and got FATAL:Module sd_mod not found. ?? On Sat, 2005-12-03 at 14:20 +, blfsuser wrote: > On Sat, 2005-12-03 at 12:43 +, Ross wrote: > > I have just bought a new Dell dimension 3100 which had a SATA ha

Re: Kernel 2.6 - SATA hd

2005-12-03 Thread Randy McMurchy
blfsuser wrote these words on 12/03/05 08:20 CST: > On Sat, 2005-12-03 at 12:43 +, Ross wrote: > >>I have just bought a new Dell dimension 3100 which had a SATA harddrive. >>I wanted to follow the LFS book using the LiveCD but it wouldnt >>recognise the HD. > > Use the command; > > lsmod |

Re: Kernel 2.6 - SATA hd

2005-12-03 Thread blfsuser
On Sat, 2005-12-03 at 12:43 +, Ross wrote: > I have just bought a new Dell dimension 3100 which had a SATA harddrive. > I wanted to follow the LFS book using the LiveCD but it wouldnt > recognise the HD. Use the command; lsmod | less and see if you have the sd_mod module loaded. This is nee

Kernel 2.6 - SATA hd

2005-12-03 Thread Ross
I have just bought a new Dell dimension 3100 which had a SATA harddrive. I wanted to follow the LFS book using the LiveCD but it wouldnt recognise the HD. I booted using SLAX Livecd which runs a 2.6.12.2 kernel and it picked up the HD without any problems. So my question is will I have problems usi

Re: xterm colour

2005-12-03 Thread Karl
On Sat, 2005-12-03 at 12:17 +0100, Jeremy Monnet wrote: > An easy way to fix all the problem is for example to create a > ~/.bashrc file, and a symlink on it from ~/.bash_profile > Jeremy Many thanks for the description of such a basic concept, much appreciated. I will read bash's fine manual mor

Re: livecd

2005-12-03 Thread Jeremy Monnet
"Edward Poe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I would have to agree with you whole-heartedly. I > > recently performed my first install of LFS using the > > LiveCD. I really liked the idea that all of the > > necessary sources were right there on the CD. I have > > I have already written on this,

Re: xterm colour

2005-12-03 Thread Jeremy Monnet
On 12/2/05, Karl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > hi, I want to be a bit more specific (or anal!), I wanted to make it > global. Upon reviewing the /etc/bashrc, it contains: > > alias 'ls = ls --color=auto' > > but it also contains: > > source /etc/profile.d/tinker-term.sh > > which in turn contain