ex, I could rewrite it ;). I will look at it right
now :).
--
Ismael Luceno
My Blog - http://ismaell.wordpress.com/
InitNG- http://www.initng.org
Ohloh - http://www.ohloh.net/accounts/ismael
Gitorious - http://gitorious.org/~ismaell
LinkedIn - http://www.linkedin.com/in/ismaell
My resume -
Bruce Dubbs escribió:
> Ismael Luceno wrote:
> No, sorry. I don't see any posts from you since 2007.
Yep, I used to use LFS, but went to debian because I had no time to
maintain my system. Now I got a new job, less hours and more
comfortable, so it lets me to dedicate more time to
ith the 64-bit stuff but it should
> work on 32bit too, isn't it?
>
> Any ideas?
>
> Thank you!
>
> Thomas
>
> --
> http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
> FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
> Unsubscribe: See the above information page
I propose to change the stripping instructions from:
strip --strip-debug /tools/lib/*
strip --strip-unneeded /tools/{,s}bin/*
to:
strip -x /tools/lib/*
strip /tools/{,s}bin/*
"strip -x" strips all non-global symbols, not only debug ones,
which produces smaller
I noticed that in the chapter 6, glibc-2.3.6 will fail to compile,
because the gcc specs patch is preventing glibc from including the
kernel headers at /usr/include, adding the option --with-headers should
solve the problem.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www
Some test related to symbols will fail when compiling binutils with -O3
or -finline-functions (because of inlined functions), but binutils
should be ok. It's a good idea to put a note about it, or maybe add
instructions to patch the tests makefiles to use -fno-inline-functions.
--
http://linuxfr
tic complains about an undefined symbol (_nc_check_termtype2),
when installing ncurses.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Randy McMurchy escribió:
Gerard Beekmans wrote these words on 05/30/06 10:42 CST:
The bootscripts were brought up as well as something this new group
could take on. The udev problem we're trying to fix is different than
the bootscript problem so people might have some issues with putting
both
Dan Nicholson escribió:
On 7/9/06, Jim Gifford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Why not make CLFS the main LFS?
The two-stage build method has been proven and tested over years for
the most popular arch, x86. I don't think it would be smart to throw
that away yet. I have no problem increasing the v
Miguel Bazdresch escribió:
Hello,
This is a report on my experience with LFS 6.2-pre1 so far.
Arch is i386 (pentium3, 800MHz). I built it with jhalfs, which went well
except for an initial glitch almost certainly caused by me.
Host is an LFS system built from SVN as of last november, slightly
Dan Nicholson escribió:
On 7/20/06, Ismael Luceno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I got a failure while installing ncurses-5.5, tic complains about an
undefined symbol. So I'm using 5.4, until I had time to check that.
Could you show the error? As I recall, this comes up from time to t
The first time i built ncurses-5.5 tic complained about some
unresolved symbols.
I built ncurses-5.5 again (this time on LFS-6.2-pre1), and tic doesn't
complain anymore, maybe i did something that caused the problem, or
maybe the problem is related to the host.
I will try to recreate the problem
Dan Nicholson escribió:
On 7/21/06, Randy McMurchy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Matthew Burgess wrote these words on 07/21/06 16:51 CST:
> Dan Nicholson wrote:
>
>> Does anyone know what creates /etc/blkid.tab?
>
> e2fsprogs
You may wish to 'man blkid' for more information.
OK, so I read it and
Bryan Kadzban escribió:
> Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> If a process is running that was started with the action ONCE and has
>> not terminated (e.g. sulogin), it may be killed also. This makes
>> your wording incorrect.
>
> That's right; I must have not realized that when looking through the
> inittab m
Bryan Kadzban escribió:
> Ismael Luceno wrote:
>> I think "Sending processes controlled by init the TERM signal..." is
>> better; as processes started by bootscipts, and bootscripts
>> themselves are not "controlled" by init.
>
> Good point.
&g
Bryan Kadzban escribió:
> Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> I was once told that the card closest to the power supply would come
>> up first because it is in the lowest numbered pci slot.
>
> I am not sure, but I do not believe this is the case anymore. (Or if it
> is, it's not supposed to be relied on.) I
Alexander E. Patrakov escribió:
> Robert Connolly wrote:
>> I noticed -O3 causes tests to fail, too, with binutils-2.17.
>>
> Does "make CFLAGS= check" fix this case also?
>
It's the same problem as with -Os, and yes, that fixes it.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ
Stef Bon escribió:
> Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
>
>> Stef Bon wrote:
>>> What do you think about unionfs?
>>> The existing situation works, but this new construction looks good.
>>>
>> Unionfs was used with LFS-6.1 LiveCDs. It has been dropped then, for a
>> reason: too buggy, especially on S
Stef Bon escribió:
> Hello all,
>
> well I've posted a howto on howtoforge with something about LFS:
>
> http://www.howtoforge.com/ihlfs_full_control_over_what_youre_installing
>
> It's about the control you can get over a installation (or everything that
> does modifications on your system) wit
hope it helps :)
- --
Ismael Luceno
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Try InitNG - http://www.initng.org
Jabber ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IRC: ismaell @ irc.freenode.org #initng
GPG Key ID: EC8E5C9A
GPG Key Fingerprint: 1356 7578 232E CCA6 D16D 46A8 FE6C 58D3 EC8E 5C9A
--
MST
> 2007
>
> And Alex:
>
> Linux version 2.6.18-3-686 (Debian 2.6.18-7) ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc
> version 4.1.2 20061115 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.1-20)) #1 SMP Mon Dec 4
> 16:41:14 UTC 2006
>
> How about:
>
> $ sed -r 's/.*(gcc version [01234567890\.]+).
e awk, sort, and uniq.
As many distros have this problem, we're working on some workarounds,
until they are fixed...
The problem is that in some cases the workaround is waiting for /usr to
be mounted, and InitNG is targeted for speed, so that's not good.
- --
Ismael Luceno
<[EMA
Matthew Burgess escribió:
On Tuesday 20 February 2007 06:35, Dan Nicholson wrote:
:
1. POSIX compliant bootscripts - I'm all for this. If anyone wants to install
a different shell as /bin/sh they should be able to without compromising
their ability to boot their system without errors. Dan,
normal LFS may take a bit more,
but the gettys/dm will be up as soon as possible, that's the beauty
of initng, it does it without any effort :).
--
Ismael Luceno
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
InitNG maintainer and project lead - http://www.initng.org
Registered Linu
Fix escribió:
> On 4/9/07, Ismael Luceno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> My system is somewhat deviated, so a normal LFS may take a bit more,
>> but the gettys/dm will be up as soon as possible, that's the beauty
>> of initng, it does it without any effor
25 matches
Mail list logo
