Stef Bon escribió: > Alexander E. Patrakov wrote: > >> Stef Bon wrote: >>> What do you think about unionfs? >>> The existing situation works, but this new construction looks good. >>> >> Unionfs was used with LFS-6.1 LiveCDs. It has been dropped then, for a >> reason: too buggy, especially on SMP. Try running "make check" for glibc >> on unionfs. Or (for stress testing) try installing the same package >> (e.g., Vim) 1000 times repeatedly in /usr on LFS-6.1.1 CD. It will just >> hang or produce an oops. Many unionfs releases could not even boot the >> CD (i.e., produced an oops as early as during boot). > That's not good. Thanks anyway for you info. > Are these bugs reported to the team developing Unionfs? > >> The new DM-based CDs handle this stress test just fine, but DM is not >> suitable for package management because it works on block device level, >> not filesystem level. >> > > What is DM?
Device Mapper. > > Stef Bon > -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
