Using python misspellings utility linked to by Igor, I've discovered
some typos in lfs-dev.
./chapter05/util-linux.xml:78: preceeding -> "preceding"
./chapter01/changelog.xml:84: accomodate -> "accommodate"
./chapter01/changelog.xml:203: availible -> "available"
./chapter01/changelog.xml:303: refe
Please try to remove and update references to libexecdir when checking
blfs packages or the change wasn't really worth a while if it won't get used
networking/connect/dhcpcd.xml:./configure
--libexecdir=/lib/dhcpcd \
general/genutils/icon-naming-utils.xml:
--libexecdir=/usr/lib/icon-naming-utils
William Harrington wrote:
On Feb 18, 2014, at 9:52 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
I got below message when I build kmod without "--disable-manpages".
checking for xsltproc... no
configure: error: xsltproc command not found, try ./configure --
disable-manpages
Yes, me too. Will revert, but will also
Armin K. wrote:
> Using python misspellings utility linked to by Igor, I've discovered
> some typos in lfs-dev.
>
> ./chapter05/util-linux.xml:78: preceeding -> "preceding"
> ./chapter01/changelog.xml:84: accomodate -> "accommodate"
> ./chapter01/changelog.xml:203: availible -> "available"
> ./chap
On Feb 19, 2014, at 12:15 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> and I have default clfs builds and the default clfs
>> builds have been installing the man pages.
>
> The fact that you build libxml2 and xsltproc before kmod makes the
> difference. Attached is my kmod build log from LFS-7.5-rc1. Notice
>
William Harrington wrote:
>
> On Feb 19, 2014, at 12:15 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>
>>> and I have default clfs builds and the default clfs
>>> builds have been installing the man pages.
>>
>> The fact that you build libxml2 and xsltproc before kmod makes the
>> difference. Attached is my kmod build
On Feb 19, 2014, at 1:11 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Did you look at my log? Search for insmod or modprobe. There's no
> reference to those man pages.
>
> There must be something different about our environments that inhibit
> installation of the man pages by 'make install' in our process.
>
> -
Pierre Labastie wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I eventually decided to study slightly more dhcpcd.
> A few switch may be suppressed, since they are the defaults.
>
> Also, the
> installation of 50-dhcpcd-compat is not needed anymore, since
> dhcpcd creates a (binary) lease information file in /var/run (which is
William Harrington wrote:
>
> On Feb 19, 2014, at 1:11 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>
>> Did you look at my log? Search for insmod or modprobe. There's no
>> reference to those man pages.
>>
>> There must be something different about our environments that inhibit
>> installation of the man pages by 'ma
Armin K. wrote:
> Doing that, I've minimized differences between development and systemd
> branches. The attached patch shows what has been added or removed from
> the main branch during the systemd development.
gettext.xml
OK, made the changes.
coreutils.xml
-mv -v /usr/bin/{rmdir,stty,sync,t
On 02/19/2014 10:23 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Armin K. wrote:
>
>> Doing that, I've minimized differences between development and systemd
>> branches. The attached patch shows what has been added or removed from
>> the main branch during the systemd development.
>
>
> gettext.xml
>
> OK, made th
If someone has the time, it would be useful if we could get a comparison
of LFS/BLFS with respect to the latest LSB beta:
http://www.linuxbase.org/snapshotspecs/lsb/
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/7.5-rc1/prologue/standards.html
-- Bruce
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/list
Armin K. wrote:
> On 02/19/2014 10:23 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> Armin K. wrote:
>>
>>> Doing that, I've minimized differences between development and systemd
>>> branches. The attached patch shows what has been added or removed from
>>> the main branch during the systemd development.
>>
>>
>> gette
On 02/19/2014 11:17 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Armin K. wrote:
>> On 02/19/2014 10:23 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>>> Armin K. wrote:
>>>
Doing that, I've minimized differences between development and systemd
branches. The attached patch shows what has been added or removed from
the main br
On 02/19/2014 11:21 PM, bdu...@higgs.linuxfromscratch.org wrote:
> Author: bdubbs
> Date: Wed Feb 19 14:21:37 2014
> New Revision: 10489
>
> Log:
> Spelling and other general cleanup.
> Use better method for installing kmod man pages.
>
> Modified:
>trunk/BOOK/chapter01/changelog.xml
>tru
Armin K. wrote:
> You have missed revision 10486. It contains some fixes that are related
> to both books (/usr/libexec updates).
OK, I'll do that tomorrow.
-- Bruce
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the abo
Wanted to report a successful build of rc1, with no errors that were not
accounted for in the book.
Regards,
Merell Matlock
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Merell L. Matlock, Jr. wrote:
> Wanted to report a successful build of rc1, with no errors that were not
> accounted for in the book.
Thanks. Much appreciated.
-- Bruce
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the abo
Le 19/02/2014 22:55, Bruce Dubbs a écrit :
> If someone has the time, it would be useful if we could get a comparison
> of LFS/BLFS with respect to the latest LSB beta:
>
> http://www.linuxbase.org/snapshotspecs/lsb/
>
> http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/7.5-rc1/prologue/standards.html
>
19 matches
Mail list logo
