Armin K. wrote:
> On 02/19/2014 10:23 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> Armin K. wrote:
>>
>>> Doing that, I've minimized differences between development and systemd
>>> branches. The attached patch shows what has been added or removed from
>>> the main branch during the systemd development.
>>
>>
>> gettext.xml
>>
>> OK, made the changes.
>>
>> coreutils.xml
>> -mv -v /usr/bin/{rmdir,stty,sync,true,uname,test,[} /bin
>> +mv -v /usr/bin/{rmdir,stty,sync,true,uname} /bin
>>
>> Why do you not want to move the test and [ commands?
They are needed if a user is using dash where they are not built in.
> Same reason as below, plus they don't fit in that block since they are
> not recommended by FHS to be in /bin iirc.
>
>> -<screen><userinput remap="install">mv -v /usr/bin/{head,sleep,nice}
>> /bin</userinput></screen>
>>
>> Same question for head,sleep,nice.
>>
>
> As I said in the original mail. The reason for not moving them was
> because the page specifically said they were required by the bootscripts
> and I don't have such thing for systemd branch.
OK, that's just a difference in the boot procedure.
>> createfiles:
>>
>> +adm:x:16:
>> +messagebus:x:18:
>> +systemd-journal:x:23:
>>
>> We'll leave these to BLFS or systemd-lfs.
>>
>> findutils.xml
>>
>> -<screen><userinput remap="install">mv -v /usr/bin/find /bin
>>
>> The cleanfs script depends on find.
>>
>
> Same answer as above, the text clearly says it's required by the
> bootscripts. If it could be rephrased in both cases that it doesn't
> mention bootscripts, they could fit just nice in systemd branch.
I suppose we could say something to the effect that the program can be
useful during the boot process before /usr is mounted and by some
bootscripts.
Doesn't systemd honor sysv bootscrits?
-- Bruce
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
