On 02/19/2014 10:23 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Armin K. wrote:
>
>> Doing that, I've minimized differences between development and systemd
>> branches. The attached patch shows what has been added or removed from
>> the main branch during the systemd development.
>
>
> gettext.xml
>
> OK, made the changes.
>
> coreutils.xml
> -mv -v /usr/bin/{rmdir,stty,sync,true,uname,test,[} /bin
> +mv -v /usr/bin/{rmdir,stty,sync,true,uname} /bin
>
> Why do you not want to move the test and [ commands?
>
Same reason as below, plus they don't fit in that block since they are
not recommended by FHS to be in /bin iirc.
> -<screen><userinput remap="install">mv -v /usr/bin/{head,sleep,nice}
> /bin</userinput></screen>
>
> Same question for head,sleep,nice.
>
As I said in the original mail. The reason for not moving them was
because the page specifically said they were required by the bootscripts
and I don't have such thing for systemd branch.
> createfiles:
>
> +adm:x:16:
> +messagebus:x:18:
> +systemd-journal:x:23:
>
> We'll leave these to BLFS or systemd-lfs.
>
> findutils.xml
>
> -<screen><userinput remap="install">mv -v /usr/bin/find /bin
>
> The cleanfs script depends on find.
>
Same answer as above, the text clearly says it's required by the
bootscripts. If it could be rephrased in both cases that it doesn't
mention bootscripts, they could fit just nice in systemd branch.
> glibc:
>
> I don't want to add systemd specific commands to glibc. The change of
> timezone from a cp to a symlink tries to link to /usr. I don't
> want to do that because of potential problems during the boot process
> (e.g. boot log timestamps).
>
> -- Bruce
>
>
Fair enough.
--
Note: My last name is not Krejzi.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
