[lfs-dev] Using period/full-stop punctuation in xml command contexts.

2013-02-13 Thread akhiezer
Hello, Ref: lfs-systemd, rev-10125 : BOOK/chapter06/intltool.xml There is the (part-)line: "Generates header files that can be read by gettext." Shouldn't the '.' be outside of the xml 'command' tag - not just logically, but also makes computer-program-parsing of the xml easier (instead of need

Re: [lfs-dev] Using period/full-stop punctuation in xml commandcontexts.

2013-02-13 Thread Matthew Burgess
On Wed, 13 Feb 2013 11:02:41 +, lf...@cruziero.com (akhiezer) wrote: > "Generates header files that can be read by gettext." > > Shouldn't the '.' be outside of the xml 'command' tag Right you are. Well spotted. Fixed in r10137. Regards, Matt. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/list

[lfs-dev] systemd-197 device naming

2013-02-13 Thread Thomas Trepl
Hi all, you may have noticed or probably read in other articles that systemd introduced a new device naming scheme starting with version 197. Doing nothing will result in device names like enp5s0 instead of eth0. A simple way to prevent systemd (the udev part of it) to rename devices is to cre

Re: [lfs-dev] systemd-197 device naming

2013-02-13 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Thomas Trepl wrote: > Hi all, > > you may have noticed or probably read in other articles that systemd > introduced a new device naming scheme starting with version 197. Doing nothing > will result in device names like enp5s0 instead of eth0. It depends on the BIOS. Older systems will not produce

Re: [lfs-dev] systemd-197 device naming

2013-02-13 Thread Matt Burgess
On Wed, 2013-02-13 at 13:01 -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Thomas Trepl wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > you may have noticed or probably read in other articles that systemd > > introduced a new device naming scheme starting with version 197. Doing > > nothing > > will result in device names like enp5s0 in

Re: [lfs-dev] systemd-197 device naming

2013-02-13 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Matt Burgess wrote: > On Wed, 2013-02-13 at 13:01 -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote: >> Thomas Trepl wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> you may have noticed or probably read in other articles that systemd >>> introduced a new device naming scheme starting with version 197. Doing >>> nothing >>> will result in devi

Re: [lfs-dev] systemd-197 device naming

2013-02-13 Thread Armin K.
On 02/13/2013 08:16 PM, Matt Burgess wrote: > On Wed, 2013-02-13 at 13:01 -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote: >> Thomas Trepl wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> you may have noticed or probably read in other articles that systemd >>> introduced a new device naming scheme starting with version 197. Doing >>> nothing

Re: [lfs-dev] systemd-197 device naming

2013-02-13 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Armin K. wrote: > On 02/13/2013 08:16 PM, Matt Burgess wrote: >> On Wed, 2013-02-13 at 13:01 -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote: >>> Thomas Trepl wrote: Hi all, you may have noticed or probably read in other articles that systemd introduced a new device naming scheme starting with version

Re: [lfs-dev] systemd-197 device naming

2013-02-13 Thread Armin K.
On 02/13/2013 08:46 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Armin K. wrote: >> lfs net-rules are prefixed with 70 while systemd net rules are prefixed >> with 80. systemd net rules are ran *after* lfs ones and they basicaly >> overwrite them. > > But 80-net-name-slot.rules is skipped internally if NAME!="" and we

Re: [lfs-dev] systemd-197 device naming

2013-02-13 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Armin K. wrote: > On 02/13/2013 08:46 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: >> Armin K. wrote: >>> lfs net-rules are prefixed with 70 while systemd net rules are prefixed >>> with 80. systemd net rules are ran *after* lfs ones and they basicaly >>> overwrite them. >> >> But 80-net-name-slot.rules is skipped inter

Re: [lfs-dev] systemd-197 device naming

2013-02-13 Thread Matt Burgess
On Wed, 2013-02-13 at 14:03 -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Armin K. wrote: > > On 02/13/2013 08:46 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > >> Armin K. wrote: > >>> lfs net-rules are prefixed with 70 while systemd net rules are prefixed > >>> with 80. systemd net rules are ran *after* lfs ones and they basicaly > >>>

Re: [lfs-dev] systemd-197 device naming

2013-02-13 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Matt Burgess wrote: > > I think that's the problem. My host (Fedora 18) calls my eth0 device > p5p1. What on earth are they doing? The link http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/PredictableNetworkInterfaceNames indicates names starting with en. Without the en, it doesn't make th

Re: [lfs-dev] systemd-197 device naming

2013-02-13 Thread Matt Burgess
On Wed, 2013-02-13 at 15:28 -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Matt Burgess wrote: > > > > > I think that's the problem. My host (Fedora 18) calls my eth0 device > > p5p1. > > What on earth are they doing? The link > http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/PredictableNetworkInterfaceNames >

Re: [lfs-dev] systemd-197 device naming

2013-02-13 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Matt Burgess wrote: > On Wed, 2013-02-13 at 15:28 -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote: >> Matt Burgess wrote: >> >>> >>> I think that's the problem. My host (Fedora 18) calls my eth0 device >>> p5p1. >> >> What on earth are they doing? The link >> http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/Predictable