Armin K. wrote: > On 02/13/2013 08:16 PM, Matt Burgess wrote: >> On Wed, 2013-02-13 at 13:01 -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote: >>> Thomas Trepl wrote: >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> you may have noticed or probably read in other articles that systemd >>>> introduced a new device naming scheme starting with version 197. Doing >>>> nothing >>>> will result in device names like enp5s0 instead of eth0. >> >> <snip> >> >>> The current udev-lfs-197-2/init-net-rules.sh creates >>> 70-persistent-net.rules which should handle it. >> >> It doesn't appear to here. I get an en7s0 device. I just forgot to >> report it after the last couple of builds.
> lfs net-rules are prefixed with 70 while systemd net rules are prefixed > with 80. systemd net rules are ran *after* lfs ones and they basicaly > overwrite them. But 80-net-name-slot.rules is skipped internally if NAME!="" and we set NAME in 70-persistent-net.rules. What am I missing? -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
