[lfs-dev] 6.62. Udev-186 (Extracted from systemd-186)

2012-07-16 Thread Bruce Dubbs
I have updated LFS for the new udev extracted from systemd. The instructions and package locations should be OK and I've regenerated the book's html and other tarballs on quantum. Text still needs to be reviewed in several places (e.g. Chapter 7) and additional testing is needed. This has bee

Re: [lfs-dev] 6.62. Udev-186 (Extracted from systemd-186)

2012-07-16 Thread Armin K.
On 07/16/2012 07:43 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > I have updated LFS for the new udev extracted from systemd. The > instructions and package locations should be OK and I've regenerated the > book's html and other tarballs on quantum. > > Text still needs to be reviewed in several places (e.g. Chapter 7

Re: [lfs-dev] 6.62. Udev-186 (Extracted from systemd-186)

2012-07-16 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Armin K. wrote: > On 07/16/2012 07:43 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: >> I have updated LFS for the new udev extracted from systemd. The >> instructions and package locations should be OK and I've regenerated the >> book's html and other tarballs on quantum. >> >> Text still needs to be reviewed in several

Re: [lfs-dev] 6.62. Udev-186 (Extracted from systemd-186)

2012-07-16 Thread Armin K.
On 07/16/2012 07:43 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > I have updated LFS for the new udev extracted from systemd. The > instructions and package locations should be OK and I've regenerated the > book's html and other tarballs on quantum. > > Text still needs to be reviewed in several places (e.g. Chapter 7

Re: [lfs-dev] 6.62. Udev-186 (Extracted from systemd-186)

2012-07-16 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Armin K. wrote: > On the > http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/development/chapter07/symlinks.html > I have noticed the following: > > "The path is determined by Udev's path_id script" ... > > There is no path_id script anymore. > > "udevadm test /sys/block/hdd" > > On my system with 3.4 kern

Re: [lfs-dev] 6.62. Udev-186 (Extracted from systemd-186)

2012-07-16 Thread Ivan Kabaivanov
On Monday 16 July 2012 20:07:25 Armin K. wrote: > On 07/16/2012 07:43 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > > I have updated LFS for the new udev extracted from systemd. The > > instructions and package locations should be OK and I've regenerated the > > book's html and other tarballs on quantum. > > > > Text

Re: [lfs-dev] 6.62. Udev-186 (Extracted from systemd-186)

2012-07-16 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Ivan Kabaivanov wrote: > actually if we're gonna be sticklers for grammar and puctuation rules, it's > gotta be: > > Installed programs: accelerometer, ata_id, cdrom_id, collect, mtd_probe, > scsi_id, v4l_id, udevadm, and udevd > > (notice the comma between 'udevadm' and 'and') Yes, I've already

Re: [lfs-dev] 6.62. Udev-186 (Extracted from systemd-186)

2012-07-16 Thread Armin K.
On 07/16/2012 08:47 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Armin K. wrote: > >> On the >> http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/development/chapter07/symlinks.html >> I have noticed the following: >> >> "The path is determined by Udev's path_id script" ... >> >> There is no path_id script anymore. >> >> "udev

Re: [lfs-dev] 6.62. Udev-186 (Extracted from systemd-186)

2012-07-16 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Armin K. wrote: > First check if it's necesary anymore. If it is, then just do whatever > kind of checking if user is root before running mknod. OK, in the mountvirtfs bootscript I added ls -l /dev/* > /run/devlog1 Right before /dev is mounted and ls -l /dev/* > /run/devlog2 right after. In

[lfs-dev] Grammar was Re: 6.62. Udev-186 (Extracted from systemd-186)

2012-07-16 Thread Ken Moffat
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 09:54:40PM +0300, Ivan Kabaivanov wrote: > > actually if we're gonna be sticklers for grammar and puctuation rules, it's > gotta be: > > Installed programs: accelerometer, ata_id, cdrom_id, collect, mtd_probe, > scsi_id, v4l_id, udevadm, and udevd > > (notice the comma

Re: [lfs-dev] Grammar was Re: 6.62. Udev-186 (Extracted from systemd-186)

2012-07-16 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Ken Moffat wrote: > On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 09:54:40PM +0300, Ivan Kabaivanov wrote: >> >> actually if we're gonna be sticklers for grammar and puctuation rules, it's >> gotta be: >> >> Installed programs: accelerometer, ata_id, cdrom_id, collect, mtd_probe, >> scsi_id, v4l_id, udevadm, and udevd >

Re: [lfs-dev] Grammar

2012-07-16 Thread DJ Lucas
On 07/16/2012 02:57 PM, Ken Moffat wrote: > On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 09:54:40PM +0300, Ivan Kabaivanov wrote: >> actually if we're gonna be sticklers for grammar and puctuation rules, it's >> gotta be: >> >> Installed programs: accelerometer, ata_id, cdrom_id, collect, mtd_probe, >> scsi_id, v4l_id,

Re: [lfs-dev] Grammar

2012-07-16 Thread Ken Moffat
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 06:47:47PM -0500, DJ Lucas wrote: > Huh, I've never heard the term Serial or Harvard, only Oxford. > Ultimately, I see it only as a matter of personal style, except when it > actually does make the sentence ambiguous. Agreed (including the terms Serial and Havard - I forg

[lfs-dev] systemd/udev not work with 'make -f udev-lfs-186/Makefile.lfs -j2'

2012-07-16 Thread xinglp
AR build/udev-local.a LINK build/udevadm LINK build/accelerometer LINK build/ata_id LINK build/cdrom_id gcc: error: build/udev-local.a: No such file or directory make: *** [build/libudev.so.1.0.2] Error 1 make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs