[lfs-dev] Latest Changes

2012-02-02 Thread Bruce Dubbs
I built LFS tonight on a kvm VM. Here are a couple of comments: The total build time was 6.3 hours. The last build (LFS 7.0) on the same machine, but on the HW was 4.1 hours. That's a 50% increase in time. I'm not sure why. The section 7.2.1. Creating stable names for network interfaces fai

Re: [lfs-dev] Latest Changes

2012-02-02 Thread Matthew Burgess
On Thu, 02 Feb 2012 03:44:55 -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > I built LFS tonight on a kvm VM. Here are a couple of comments: > > The total build time was 6.3 hours. The last build (LFS 7.0) on the > same machine, but on the HW was 4.1 hours. That's a 50% increase in > time. I'm not sure why. Bui

Re: [lfs-dev] Latest Changes

2012-02-02 Thread Nathan Coulson
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 2:09 AM, Matthew Burgess wrote: > On Thu, 02 Feb 2012 03:44:55 -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote: >> I built LFS tonight on a kvm VM.  Here are a couple of comments: >> >> The total build time was 6.3 hours.  The last build (LFS 7.0) on the >> same machine, but on the HW was 4.1 hou

Re: [lfs-dev] Latest Changes

2012-02-02 Thread Gerard Beekmans
On 02/02/2012 03:44, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > I built LFS tonight on a kvm VM. Here are a couple of comments: > > The total build time was 6.3 hours. The last build (LFS 7.0) on the > same machine, but on the HW was 4.1 hours. That's a 50% increase in > time. I'm not sure why. First thing I person

Re: [lfs-dev] Latest Changes

2012-02-02 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Nathan Coulson wrote: > I was wondering, if using --enable-kvm --drive file=os.img,if=virtio > would give any noticable improvement > > --enable-kvm, use the virtualization instructions in the processor (faster) > --drive file=os.img,if=virtio, (Requires VIRTIO_BLK in kernel), > > threw a thread

[lfs-dev] fedora

2012-02-02 Thread Bruce Dubbs
I have another reason to dislike fedora. I wanted to look at what environment variables were used and did a simple 'set' command. I got a bunch of garbage. Upon investigating, I got about 70 lines of variables and about 9600! lines of functions that could easily be in a script. Blech.

Re: [lfs-dev] fedora

2012-02-02 Thread Gerard Beekmans
On 02/02/2012 15:25, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > I have another reason to dislike fedora. I wanted to look at what > environment variables were used and did a simple 'set' command. I got a > bunch of garbage. Upon investigating, I got about 70 lines of > variables and about 9600! lines of functions th

Re: [lfs-dev] fedora

2012-02-02 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Gerard Beekmans wrote: > On 02/02/2012 15:25, Bruce Dubbs wrote: >> I have another reason to dislike fedora. I wanted to look at what >> environment variables were used and did a simple 'set' command. I got a >> bunch of garbage. Upon investigating, I got about 70 lines of >> variables and abou

Re: [lfs-dev] Latest Changes

2012-02-02 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Nathan Coulson wrote: > > I was wondering, if using --enable-kvm --drive file=os.img,if=virtio > would give any noticable improvement > > --enable-kvm, use the virtualization instructions in the processor (faster) > --drive file=os.img,if=virtio, (Requires VIRTIO_BLK in kernel), I haven't had a c

Re: [lfs-dev] fedora

2012-02-02 Thread Aleksandar Kuktin
>On Thu, 02 Feb 2012 17:16:10 -0600 >Bruce Dubbs wrote: > > Gerard Beekmans wrote: > > On 02/02/2012 15:25, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > >> I have another reason to dislike fedora. I wanted to look at what > >> environment variables were used and did a simple 'set' command. I > >> got a bunch of garbage

Re: [lfs-dev] Latest Changes

2012-02-02 Thread Bryan Kadzban
Bruce Dubbs wrote: > The section 7.2.1. Creating stable names for network interfaces > failed. Argh. Again. > Running manually gives: > > <...> > > This program is for debugging only, it does not run any program, > specified by a RUN key. <...> I wonder if they finally made this true. This

Re: [lfs-dev] Latest Changes

2012-02-02 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Bryan Kadzban wrote: > Bruce Dubbs wrote: >> The section 7.2.1. Creating stable names for network interfaces >> failed. > > Argh. Again. > >> Running manually gives: >> >> <...> >> >> This program is for debugging only, it does not run any program, >> specified by a RUN key. <...> > > I wonder

[lfs-dev] zlib 1.2.6 incompatibilities

2012-02-02 Thread Tobias Gasser
zlib 1.2.6 seems to have some issues. building partimage 0.6.9 fails with several errors in imagefile.cpp error cannot convert 'gzFile_s**' to 'gzFile' for argument... using zlib 1.2.5 fixes this error. google was no help, possibly i'm the first to hit this issue as zlib 1.2.6 was released jus

[lfs-dev] mountfs for svn

2012-02-02 Thread Bruce Dubbs
In the poweroff/reboot procedures mountfs does: umount -a -d -r -t notmpfs,nosysfs >/dev/null We probably want to add nodevtmpfs to that list. It was giving me some errors without. -- BTW, I can't get over how fast kvm reboots. It does take about 20 seconds to shut down, but most of tha

[lfs-dev] lfs bootscripts and multiple instances

2012-02-02 Thread Dean Takemori
I'm trying to setup multiple instances of rsyslog (one for kernel messages) using lfs-bootscripts-20120116 and running into some problems. I'm using rsyslogd 5.8.6, which is designed with multiple instance support. I've set up one configuration file (/etc/rsysklog.conf) for the kernel logger and