I obtain, with "addr2line --version", the following:
LFS6.5: GNU addr2line (GNU Binutils) 2.19.1
LFS6.7: GNU addr2line (GNU Binutils) 2.20.1.20100303
LFS6.8: GNU addr2line (GNU Binutils) 2.21
How safe is the upgrade to Binutils 2.22?
Or:
Has anyone perf
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 08:59:04AM -0800, Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
> I obtain, with "addr2line --version", the following:
>
> LFS6.5: GNU addr2line (GNU Binutils) 2.19.1
> LFS6.7: GNU addr2line (GNU Binutils) 2.20.1.20100303
> LFS6.8: GNU addr2line (GNU
On 22/11/2011 19:49, Ken Moffat wrote:
> For LFS-svn, there is *always* a possibility of breakage as soon as
> you get into BLFS. Unlikely, but possible. With a fair wind, those
> sort of problems will mostly be caught by the time a new LFS is
> released. To be honest, I can't remember the las
Thanks for the reply, Ken. Please, read inline.
--- Em ter, 22/11/11, Ken Moffat escreveu:
> De: Ken Moffat
> Assunto: Re: [lfs-dev] Binutils 2.22
> Para: "LFS Developers Mailinglist"
> Data: Terça-feira, 22 de Novembro de 2011, 17:49
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 08:59:04AM
> -0800, Fernando de
Thanks for the reply, Matt. Please, read my reply to Ken.
[]s,
Fernando de Oliveira
Natal, RN, BRAZIL
--- Em ter, 22/11/11, Matthew Burgess escreveu:
> De: Matthew Burgess
> Assunto: Re: [lfs-dev] Binutils 2.22
> Para: lfs-dev@linuxfromscratch.org
> Data: Terça-feira, 22 de Novembro de 2011, 1
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 03:12:26PM -0800, Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
>
> Please, let me know if I understand correctly: with this, I do not need to
> build chapter 5?
No, that is NOT what I meant. The who "build just enough in
chapter 5, then use that to build the new LFS system" is part of
"
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 11:52:47PM +, Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 03:12:26PM -0800, Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
> >
> > Please, let me know if I understand correctly: with this, I do not need to
> > build chapter 5?
>
> No, that is NOT what I meant. The who "build just enou
Thank you for this very instructive reply, Ken.
--- Em ter, 22/11/11, Ken Moffat escreveu:
> De: Ken Moffat
> Assunto: Re: [lfs-dev] Binutils 2.22
> Para: "LFS Developers Mailinglist"
> Data: Terça-feira, 22 de Novembro de 2011, 21:52
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 03:12:26PM
> -0800, Fernando de O
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 7:37 PM, Fernando de Oliveira
wrote:
>> > 1. What is exactly a or the toolchain.
>>
>> Binutils, gcc, and glibc. Arguably, whichever other
>> packages gcc
>> currently needs (gmp, mpc, mpfr).
>
> Thanks. However, encouraged by the Chapter 12. Programming of BLFS, sometim
