Thanks for the reply, Matt. Please, read my reply to Ken. []s, Fernando de Oliveira Natal, RN, BRAZIL
--- Em ter, 22/11/11, Matthew Burgess <matt...@linuxfromscratch.org> escreveu: > De: Matthew Burgess <matt...@linuxfromscratch.org> > Assunto: Re: [lfs-dev] Binutils 2.22 > Para: lfs-dev@linuxfromscratch.org > Data: Terça-feira, 22 de Novembro de 2011, 18:32 > On 22/11/2011 19:49, Ken Moffat > wrote: > > For LFS-svn, there is *always* a > possibility of breakage as soon as > > you get into BLFS. Unlikely, but possible. > With a fair wind, those > > sort of problems will mostly be caught by the time a > new LFS is > > released. To be honest, I can't remember the > last time a package > > upgrade in LFS had to be reverted, but I think it has > happened. > > Out of the toolchain packages, I think binutils is probably > going to > carry the least risk of breakage, but as Ken says, unless > you have a > really pressing reason to upgrade, I'd just leave it alone > until your > next full build. Even if there's a critical security > vulnerability or > show-stopping bug, it's probably safer to patch your > current version, > assuming it's not too far behind. > > Regards, > > Matt. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
